-
Redox Reactions of BrO2
Br-,20 and ClO2 to ClO2- 21 and prevents chromatographic column
degradation by these species. An aliquot of the quenched reaction
was removed and mixed with a solution containing excess OH- to
prevent further reactions between NO2- and ClO2-. Samples were
HOClOBrO- adduct is preferred over the Y-shaped HOCl-
Br(O)O- structure. They also state that the interconversion
from HOClOBrO- to HOBrOClO- is not allowed (in the
gas phase), due to a large kinetic barrier. However, the
present work examines the HOCl/BrO2- reaction in aqueous
solution where this interconversion is possible due to the
presence of proton donors. The rate constants and mecha-
nisms for the reactions of BrO2- with HOCl, Cl2O, and Cl2
are determined. The connectivity of HOClOBrO-, HOBrO-
ClO-, and BrOClO intermediates is discussed on the basis
of the proposed mechanisms.
-
then injected on the ion chromatograph to determine BrO3 and
-
Br-. The concentration of BrO3 and Br- was corrected for the
initial concentration of these ions in the BrO2- stock solution. Due
to the NO2- quench reaction, the concentration of Br- determined
in the product study was the sum of [HOBr] and [Br-]. The yield
-
of ClO3 was determined by subtracting the yield of ClO2 from
the yield of Br-. The yield of ClO3- was also determined by using
the ion chromatograph and gave similar results ((5%).
Results and Discussion
Experimental Section
Products of the HOCl/BrO2- Reaction. The reaction of
Reagents. Stock solutions of NaClO4 were prepared from the
recrystallized salt. The preparation of NaBrO2 was reported
previously.12 The NaBrO2 salt (63.4 wt %) contained H2O (12.2%),
NaOH (14.1%), Na2SO4 (1.9%), NaBrO3 (7.0%), and NaBr (1.3%)
-
-
0.15 mM BrO2 with excess HOCl produces ClO3 , ClO2,
-
Cl-, BrO3 , and HOBr. Any Br- produced from the HOCl/
BrO2- reaction reacts rapidly with HOCl to form HOBr and
-
Cl-.22 Variation of [HOCl]T (6.53-11.4 mM), [H2PO4 ]T
-
impurities. Solutions of BrO2 were standardized spectrophoto-
metrically at 295 nm (ꢀ ) 115 M-1 cm-1).13 Stock solutions of
OCl- ([OCl-] ) [Cl-]) were prepared by dispersing Cl2 gas through
0.3 M NaOH. “Chloride-free” OCl- solutions were made as
reported previously.1 Solutions of OCl- were standardized spec-
trophotometrically at 292 nm (ꢀ ) 362 M-1 cm-1).2
(25-75 mM), and p[H+] (6.16-6.98) has little effect on the
product distribution (Supporting Information Table S1). The
primary path (85 ( 1%, based on the initial concentration
-
-
of BrO2 ) is a multistep oxidation of HOCl by BrO2 to
-
form ClO3 , HOBr, and Cl- (eq 1). Other pathways produce
BrO3 and Cl- (eq 2) or ClO2, HOBr, and Cl- (eq 3) in
Methodology and Instrumentation. All pH measurements were
corrected to p[H+] on the basis of electrode calibration (µ ) 0.50
M). Kinetic data were obtained with the ionic strength controlled
at 0.50 M (NaClO4). The pKa values for HOCl and H2PO4- at µ )
0.50 M are 7.5014 and 6.46,15 respectively. The concentration of
HBrO2 (pKa 3.59(5)16) is negligible from p[H+] 6-7. The dispro-
-
yields of 7 ( 2% and 8 ( 1%, respectively. These yields
-
apply to an initial BrO2 concentration of 0.15 mM.
Increasing the concentration of BrO2- to 0.62 mM increases
the yield of ClO2 to 19 ( 1%.
portionation of BrO2 is very slow17 and under the conditions of
-
2HOCl + BrO2- f ClO3- + HOBr + Cl- + H+ (1)
-
this study does not compete with the HOCl/BrO2 reaction.
Spectrophotometric measurements were performed on a Perkin-
HOCl + BrO2- f BrO3- + Cl- + H+
(2)
Elmer Lambda 9 UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer. Stopped-flow
measurements of the loss of BrO2- at 250 nm (ꢀ ) 345 M-1 cm-1
)
or the formation of ClO2 at 360 nm (ꢀ ) 1220 M-1 cm-1) were
performed on an Applied Photophysics stopped-flow spectrometer.
Ion chromatographic separations were obtained as described previ-
ously.18
3HOCl + 2BrO2- f 2ClO2 + 2HOBr + Cl- + OH- (3)
The distribution of products from the reaction of HOCl
-
with BrO2 is quite surprising. First, the assumption that
The products of the reaction were determined by mixing solutions
-
-
HOCl oxidizes BrO2 only to BrO3 is not correct,9 since
this path (eq 2) represents only 7% of the reaction. In fact,
the oxidation of HOCl by BrO2- to form ClO3- (eq 1) is the
major stoichiometric path for this reaction. Another unex-
pected result is the formation of ClO2 as a product of the
-
of excess HOCl (also containing H2PO4- and HPO42-) with BrO2
.
Within 10 s, a portion of the HOCl/BrO2- mixture was transferred
to a cuvette and inserted into a Spectronic 20-D spectrophotometer.
The increase in absorbance due to ClO2 at 359 nm was followed
until the absorbance reached a maximum. The maximum absorbance
was used to calculate the yield of ClO2 from the reaction. Aliquots
were removed and mixed with a solution of excess NO2- to quench
-
reaction. Previous studies of the HOBr/ClO2 reaction2
-
showed that the reaction of ClO2 with BrOClO is respon-
-
the reaction. The NO2 rapidly reduces HOCl to Cl-,19 HOBr to
sible for the formation of ClO2 in that system. Since there is
no added ClO2- in the HOCl/BrO2- reaction, it was not clear
initially how ClO2 could be formed in the reaction. We will
show in the following sections that ClO2- plays a vital role
(10) (a) Buxton, G. V.; Dainton, F. S. Proc. R. Soc. A 1968, 304, 427-
439. (b) Nicoson, J. S.; Wang, L.; Becker, R. H.; Huff Hartz, K. E.;
Muller, C. E.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2975-2980.
(11) Guha, S.; Francisco, J. S. Chem. Phys. 2001, 269, 179-187.
(12) Wang, L.; Nicoson, J. S.; Huff Hartz, K. E.; Francisco, J. S.; Margerum,
D. W. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 108-113.
(13) Perrone, T. F. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 1998.
(14) Gerritsen, C. M.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2757-
2762.
-
as an intermediate in the HOCl/BrO2 reaction.
Kinetics of ClO2 Formation. The increase in absorbance
due to ClO2 at 360 nm from the reaction of excess HOCl
with BrO2- is typical of an autocatalytic reaction (Figure 1a
(15) Beckwith, R. C.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 3754-
3760.
(19) Johnson, D. W.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 4845-
4851.
(16) Huff Hartz, K. E.; Nicoson, J. S.; Wang, L.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg.
Chem. 2003, 42, 78-87.
(20) (a) Lister, M. W.; McLeod, P. E. Can. J. Chem. 1971, 49, 1987-
1992. (b) Huff Hartz, K. E. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 2002.
(21) Stanbury, D. M.; Martinez, R.; Tseng, E.; Miller, C. E. Inorg. Chem.
1988, 27, 4277-4280.
(17) Faria, R. B.; Epstein, I. R.; Kustin, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1363-
1367.
(18) Margerum, D. W.; Huff Hartz, K. E. J. EnViron. Monit. 2002, 4, 20-
26.
(22) Kumar, K.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 2706-2711.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 19, 2003 5819