Chemistry - An Asian Journal
10.1002/asia.201600682
COMMUNICATION
[8]
a) A. Dornow, K. Bruncken, Chem. Ber. 1950, 83, 189-193; b) S. Conti,
S. Cossu, G. Giacomelli, M. Falorni, Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 13493-
13500; c) S. Cossu, S. Conti, G. Giacomelli, M. Falorni, Synthesis 1994,
1429-1432; d) G. I. Georg, G. C. B. Harriman, M. Hepperle, J. S.
Clowers, D. G. Vander Velde, R. H. Himes, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
2664-2676; e) D. Raatz, C. Innertsberger, O. Reiser, Synlett 1999,
1907-1910; f) J. L. G. Ruano, J. Aleman, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4513-4516;
g) D. Enders, C. Grondal, M. Vrettou, G. Raabe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 4079-4083; h) Y. Wang, Q.-F. He, H.-W. Wang, X. Zhou, Z.-Y.
Huang, Y. Qin, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1588-1591.
Intermediate
A
reacts with
1
in
a
stepwise aldol
addition/cyclization pathway through formation of syn-aldol
intermediate syn-B to afford N,O-acetal intermediate trans-C
under thermodynamic control.[17] The intermediate trans-C was
further protonated to afford N,O-acetal adduct trans-3 with
regeneration of Zn(HMDS)OTf. Enhanced Lewis acidity of the
Zn hybrid species might accelerate the addition step
efficiently.[18] In the catalytic cycle, it was revealed that
Zn(HMDS)OTf played three major roles (Scheme 2, bottom
scheme). The first is promoting the desired aldol reaction to
afford syn-aldol intermediate syn-B through C–C bond formation.
The second is promoting the intramolecular cyclization of syn-B
into trans-C. The third is promoting the retro-aldol process
through C–C bond-cleavage reaction of the anti-aldol adduct
anti-4.
[9]
For related direct-type aldol reactions of glycine Schiff base, see:
review a) C. Nájera, J. M. Sansano, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4585-4671;
For other representative examples, see: b) M. J. O’Donnell, W. D.
Bennett, S. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2353–2355; c) M.
Horikawa, J. Busch-Petersen, E. J. Corey, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
3843–3846; d) T. Ooi, M. Taniguchi, M. Kameda, K. Maruoka, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4542–4544; e) N. Yoshikawa, M. Shibasaki,
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8289–8298; f) J. B. MacMillan, T. F. Molinski,
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1883–1886; g) T. Ooi, M. Kameda, M. Taniguchi, K.
Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9685–9694; h) B. Seashore-
Ludlow, S. Torssell, P. Somfai Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 3927-3933; i)
R. Rahmani, M. Matsumoto, Y. Yamashita, S. Kobayashi, Chem. Asian
J. 2012, 7, 1191-1194; j) S. Lou, A. Ramirez, D. A. Conlon, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2015, 357, 28-34.
In summary, we have developed a newly designed zinc Lewis
acid/metal amide hybrid catalyst for aldol-type additions of 2-
picolylamine Schiff base to aldehydes. It was found that only the
hybrid catalyst Zn(HMDS)OTf showed high activity; neither
Lewis acid Zn(OTf)2 nor metal amide Zn(HMDS)2 had catalyst
activity. The desired reactions proceeded smoothly in the
presence of Zn(HMDS)OTf to afford the trans-N,O-acetal
adducts as syn-aldol adduct equivalents, in good to high yields
with high selectivities. The obtained N,O-acetal adduct was
converted into a precursor of a biologically active compound.
Whereas initial NMR experiments suggested an apparent
inconsistency in the results, final MICCS NMR analysis indicated
that the observed high stereoselectivities were generated under
thermodynamic control rather than under kinetic control. This is
a rare example of highly stereoselective aldol-type reaction
under thermodynamic control. Furthermore, in this study we
have revealed the strong potential of Lewis acid/metal amide
hybrid catalysts as highly efficient, simple one-molecule
acid/base catalysts. Further investigations including asymmetric
catalysis and the development of other hybrid catalysts are
ongoing.
[10] For related catalytic asymmetric [3+2] cycloadditions of Schiff base of
2-picolylamine, see: S. Padilla, R. Tejero, J. Adrio, J. C. Carretero Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 5608-5611.
[11] a) Y. Cui, Y. Yamashita, S. Kobayashi, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
10319-10321; b) Y. Cui, W. Li, T. Sato, Y. Yamashita, S. Kobayashi,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1193-1205; c) Y. Saito, Y. Yamashita, S.
Kobayashi, Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 976-977.
[12] KHMDS could also promote the reaction, but the selectivity was lower
than Zn(HMDS)OTf. See Table S1 in the Supporting Information (SI).
[13] The data have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Centre as CCDC 1433949.
[14] See also ref. 9h for a related cyclic product.
[15] a) M. Nakakoshi, M. Ueda, S. Sakurai, K. Asakura, H. Utsumi, O.
Miyata, T. Naito, Y. Takahashi. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2007, 45, 989;
For an application of the MICCS system for analysis of the early stage
of
a reaction, see: b) J. Nakano, K. Masuda, Y. Yamashita, S.
Kobayashi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9525-9529.
[16] In aldol-type reactions of glycine Schiff bases, both trans- and cis-cyclic
products could form (ref. 9h), which did not go back to the
corresponding aldol intermediates under typical catalytic reaction
conditions. See also ref. 9g.
Keywords: Lewis acid • metal amide • catalyst • aldol-type
addition • MICCS
[17] In this step, it is difficult to distinguish between a stepwise aldol
[1]
a) Lewis Acids in Organic Synthesis (Ed.: H. Yamamoto), Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, 2000; b) Acid Catalysis in Modern Organic
Synthesis (Eds.: H. Yamamoto, K. Ishihara), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH
& Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2008; c) S. Kobayashi, R. Matsubara, Chem.
Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10694; d) N. Kumagai, M. Shibasaki, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4760-4772.
addition/cyclization pathway and
a
concerted 1,3-dipole [3+2]
cycloaddition pathway at the current stage; however, judging from the
exclusive formation of trans-N,O-acetal adduct and anti-aldol adduct
(without formation of any cis-N,O-acetal adduct and syn-aldol adduct), it
is reasonable to consider that the reaction would proceed through a
stepwise pathway.
[2]
[3]
Y. Yamashita, S. Kobayashi, Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 9420-9427.
a) Y. Yamashita, X.-X. Guo, R. Takashita, S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 3262-3263; b) Y. Yamashita, T. Imaizumi, S.
Kobayashi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4893-4896; c) Y.
Yamashita, T. Imaizumi, X.-X. Guo, S. Kobayashi, Chem. Asian J. 2011,
6, 2550-2559; d) T. Imaizumi, Y. Yamashita, S. Kobayashi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 20049-20052.
[18] Lewis acidity of Zn(HMDS)OTf was evaluated by DFT calculations of
Zn(NH2)2, Zn(NH2)OTf and Zn(OTf)2. Lewis acidity of Zn(NH2)OTf was
stronger than Zn(NH2)2 but weaker than Zn(OTf)2. See Supporting
Information.
[4]
[5]
Y. Yamashita, Y. Saito, T. Imaizumi, S. Kobayashi, Chem. Sci. 2014, 5,
3958.
For recent reviews of zinc catalysis, see: a) X.-F. Wu, H. Neumann,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 3141-3160; b) S. Enthaler, ACS Catal.
2013, 3, 150-158; c) D. Łowicki, S. Baś, J. Mlynarski, Tetrahedron 2015,
71, 1339-1394.
[6]
[7]
J. Brendel, H. C. Englert, S. Peukert, K. Wirth, M. Wagner, J.-M. Ruxer,
F. Pilorge, WO 2006136305 A1, December 28, 2006.
For related aldol reactions, see: a) A. R. Katritzky, G. Yao, S. Rachwal,
J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1994, 31, 757-763; b) T. Murai, E. Nagaya, F.
Shibahara, T. Maruyama, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 4943-4953.
For internal use, please do not delete. Submitted_Manuscript