R-Gal pentasaccharide moiety is still in great demand. Herein
we present a new method for the rapid synthesis of the
pentasaccharide derivative 2 (Figure 1) by a four-component
one-pot strategy. The aminopropyl group7 was incorporated
as a side chain for further derivation. The feature of this
work lies in the integration of three glycosylation steps into
one synthetic operation to furnish the target oligosaccharide
in a few hours without the need for protecting group
manipulation and intermediate isolation.
The one-pot sequential glycosylation strategy8 for the
assembly of oligosaccharides has achieved success as
demonstrated by syntheses of some naturally occurring
oligosaccharides such as Ley,9 fucosyl GM1,10 and Globo H.11
In all of these examples, a three-component coupling strategy
was applied. To enhance the efficiency of the one-pot
approach, we tried to explore the possibility of synthesis of
the R-Gal pentasaccharide by a four-component one-pot
sequential glycosylation method. The retrosynthetic analysis
divided the fully protected target pentasaccharide 3 into four
building blocks: the galactose building blocks 4 and 5, the
glucosamine building block 6, and the lactose building block
7 (Scheme 1). According to the reactivity order of thiogly-
selection of protecting groups was the main concern in the
design of the second and third building blocks, because the
presence of a free hydroxyl group and a thiotoluene
functionality would make them act as both a glycosyl
acceptor and a glycosyl donor. Moreover, their relative
reactivities toward glycosylation should fall between 4 and
7. We finally found that building blocks 5 and 6 were suitable
for the successful one-pot synthesis.
We chose thioglycosides as glycosyl donors because they
are stable enough in most cases and can be activated by a
variety of promoters. To perform an efficient one-pot syn-
thesis, we tried several promoter systems, such as dimethyl-
(thiomethyl)sulfonium triflate (DMTST),12 N-iodosuccin-
imide and triflic acid (NIS/TfOH),13 phenylsulfenyl chloride
and silver triflate (PhSCl/AgOTf),14 and 1-benzenesulfinyl
piperidine and triflic anhydride (BSP/Tf2O).15 Eventually we
found that BSP/Tf2O was the most efficient promoter for
the one-pot glycosylation protocol.
Building blocks 4 and 5 were prepared by literature
procedures.8a The synthesis of building block 6 is shown in
Scheme 2. O-Benzylation of p-methylphenyl 4,6-O-benzyl-
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Building Block 6
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of the Pentasaccharide
Moiety
idene-2-deoxy-2-phthalimido-1-thio-â-D-glucopyranoside8a gave
saccharide 8 in 92% yield. Regioselective reductive ring
opening of the 4,6-O-benzylidene acetal of 8 produced 6 in
90% yield with the 4-hydroxyl group exposed. The synthesis
of building block 7 started from lactose peracetate 9.16
Compound 9 was converted to the â-lactoside 10 in 43%
yield by coupling with benzyl N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-carbam-
ate in the presence of BF3‚Et2O. Saccharide 10 was deacet-
ylated, treated with dibutyltin oxide, and reacted with allyl
bromide to provide regioselectively 3′-O-allyl-protected
lactoside 11. The benzylation of the remaining hydroxyls of
11 was performed under the conditions of sodium hydride
and benzyl bromide in DMF to give compound 12. Removal
of the allyl protecting group of 12 by palladium(II) chloride
yielded building block 7 in 98% yield (Scheme 3).
cosides that the Wong group reported,8a,b building block 4
should have the highest reactivity among the four compo-
nents, and the reducing end component 7 should have no
reactivity because of its O-glycosyl linkage, which cannot
be activated by promoters of thioglycoside donors. The
(5) Gege, C.; Kinzy, W.; Schmidt, R. R. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 328,
459.
(6) Fang, J.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, W.;
Yu, L.; Brew, K.; Wang, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6635.
(7) Liaigre, J.; Dubreuil, D.; Pradere, J.-P.; Bouhours, J.-F. Carbohydr.
Res. 2000, 325, 265.
With all building blocks in hand, the four-component
assembly of fully protected pentasaccharide derivative 3 was
attempted as outlined in Scheme 4. The one-pot synthetic
operation was performed in the presence of the BSP/Tf2O
(8) (a) Zhang, Z.; Ollmann, I. R.; Ye, X.-S.; Wischnat, R.; Baasov, T.;
Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 734. (b) Koeller, K. M.; Wong,
C.-H. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 4465. (c) Douglas, N. L.; Ley, S. V.; Lucking,
U.; Warriner, S. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 51.
(9) Mong, T. K.-K.; Wong, C.-H. Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4261.
(10) Mong, T. K.-K.; Lee, H.-K.; Duron, S. G.; Wong, C.-H. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 797.
(12) Fugedi, P.; Garegg, P. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1986, 149, 9.
(13) Konradsson, P.; Udodong, U. E.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 4313.
(14) (a) Martichonok, V.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
1702. (b) Crich, D.; Sun, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8321.
(15) Crich, D.; Smith, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9015.
(16) Ravindranathan, K. K. P.; Field, R. A. Carbohydr. Lett. 1998, 3,
179.
(11) Burkhart, F.; Zhang, Z.; Wacowich-Sgarbi, S.; Wong, C.-H. Angew.
Chem. 2001, 113, 1314.
4416
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004