Guo et al.
SCHEME 1. Conformational Equilibrium in Salicylanilide
able for their inhibitory functions. Although the exact equilib-
rium status is not yet clear, the role of the electron-withdrawing
substituent at the anilino moiety in the inhibitory activity of
salicylanilides remains to be clarified. Another issue untouched
is the possible interaction of salicylanilides with ATP, in addition
to their competition for binding sites in tyrosine kinase. In fact,
salicylanilides, containing conventional hydrogen-bonding donor
groups, phenolic OH and amido NH, are potent anion recep-
tors.3,4 Interaction of them with ATP is indeed expected, and
whether this interaction, if any, influences the conformation of
salicylanilides is unclear.
We thus carried out a systematic investigation of the
conformation in acetonitrile (CH3CN) of a series of salicyla-
nilides bearing substituent X at the 3′- or 4′-position of the
anilino moiety ranging from electron-donating p-OCH3 to highly
electron-withdrawing p-CN (1a-h, Figure 1) in the absence and
presence of H2PO4-, an alternative taken for ATP. Although
infrared (IR) and NMR have been widely employed useful
techniques for clarifying the conformation of amides and the
involved hydrogen bonds,5 we proposed a fluorescence method
for the case of salicylanilides, not only because of the higher
spectroscopy sensitivity and enlarged solvent availability, but
more specifically due to the intriguing photophysical properties
of salicylanilides. In the closed-ring conformer of salicylanilides,
the phenolic OH is intramolecularly hydrogen bonded to the
FIGURE 1. Chemical structures of salicylanilides 1a-h and methoxy
counterparts 2a-g.8a
carbonyl O atom, which could be signaled by the observation
of excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIintraPT)
fluorescence. Phenolic OH in the open-ring conformer, on the
other hand, is not intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded, and
salicylanilides are hence prone to emit excited-state intermo-
lecular proton transfer (ESIinterPT) fluorescence, especially when
a proton acceptor such as an anion is present. As a consequence,
the conformation of salicylanilides could be probed by the
character of the proton-transfer fluorescence. Our investigations
showed fluorescence spectroscopy indeed worked well in this
regard and uncovered that H2PO4- could switch the conforma-
tion of salicylanilides from the closed-ring form to the open-
ring form, and this switching was subject to the electron-
withdrawing ability of substituent X.
Results and Discussion
Suezawa et al.5c in 2000 determined by NMR the conforma-
tion of unsubstituted salicylanilide 1d in CCl4 and suggested
that 1d adopted mainly the closed-ring conformation. It was
thus wondered whether the closed-ring conformation was still
(2) (a) Blanco, S. E.; Ferretti, F. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2577-
2581. (b) Palomar, J.; De Paz, J. L. G.; Catala´n, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000,
104, 6453-6463. (c) Catala´n, J.; Palomar, J.; De Paz, J. L. G. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1997, 101, 7914-7921.
1
predominant in more polar CH3CN, the solvent used here. H
NMR and NOESY spectra of 1d in CD3CN were recorded. The
phenolic OH signal was observed at 12.01 ppm, which is close
to 11.98 ppm in CCl4 but is shifted to far downfield compared
to that of non-hydrogen-bonded phenolic OH normally observed
at 4-6 ppm,5b indicating the OH‚‚‚OdC intramolecular hydro-
gen bonding in 1d. The NOESY spectrum shows obvious NOE
correlations of the amido NH proton with the aryl CH proton
at the 6- and 6′-positions (Figure 2), providing further evidence
for the preference of the closed-ring to open-ring conformation
in the equilibrium (Scheme 1). Correlation with the Hammett
constant of substituent X of the NMR signals of phenolic OH
and amido NH protons of 1a-h in CD3CN and DMSO-d6
(Figure 3) confirmed that indeed the phenolic OH proton was
involved in an intramolecular hydrogen bond while the amido
NH proton was exposed to solvent molecules to a much higher
extent, and all of them took the closed-ring conformation in
CH3CN and even in highly polar and hydrogen-bonding DMSO.
It was also found in Figure 3 that, with increasing electron-
withdrawing ability of X, the signal of the phenolic OH proton
shifted to high field, suggesting a weakening OH‚‚‚OdC
hydrogen bond. This is in agreement with our molecular
mechanic calculations which showed increasing OH‚‚‚OdC
hydrogen bond length (B3LYP/6-31G* level)6 and decreasing
hydrogen-bonding energy7 (Table 1). This means that the
conformational equilibrium of 1 (Scheme 1) is shifted more
toward the open-ring side when X becomes more electron-
withdrawing.2
(3) (a) Santacroce, P. V.; Davis, J. T.; Light, M. E.; Gale, P. A.; Iglesias-
Sanchez, J. C.; Prados, p.; Quesada, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1886-
1887. (b) Winstanley, K. J.; Smith, D. K. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2803-
2815. (c) Winstanley, K. J.; Sayer, A. M.; Smith, D. K. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006, 4, 1760-1767. (d) Libra, E. R.; Scott, M. J. Chem. Commun. 2006,
1485-1487. (e) Ghosh, S.; Choudhury, A. R.; Guru Row, T. N.; Maitra,
U. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1441-1444. (f) Kondo, S.; Suzuki, T.; Toyama, T.;
Yano, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 1348-1350. (g) Smith, D. K.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3874-3877. (h) Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Wu,
F.-Y.; Jiang, Y.-B. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2667-2670. (i) Kondo, S.; Suzuki,
T.; Yano, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7059-7061. (j) Lee, D. H.; Lee,
K. H.; Hong, J. I. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 5-8. (k) Lee, D. H.; Lee, H. Y.; Lee,
K. H.; Hong, J. I. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1188-1189. (l) Lee, K. H.; Lee,
H. Y.; Lee, D. H.; Hong, J. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5447-5449. (m)
Lee, C.; Lee, D. H.; Hong, J. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8665-8668.
(4) (a) Gale, P. A., Ed. Coordination Chemistry ReViews; Elsevier: New
York, 2006; Vol. 250. (b) Gale, P. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 465-475.
(c) Kang, S. O.; Begum, R. A.; Bowman-James, K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 7882-7894. (d) Mart´ınez-Ma´n˜ez, R.; Sanceno´n, F. Chem.
ReV. 2003, 103, 4419-4476. (e) Gale, P. A., Ed. Coordination Chemistry
ReViews; Elsevier: New York, 2003; Vol. 240. (f) Suksai, C.; Tuntulani,
T. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2003, 32, 192-202. (g) Beer, P. D.; Gale, P. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 486-516. (h) Wiskur, S. L.; Ait-Haddou, H.;
Lavigne, J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 963-972.
(5) (a) Kanamori, D.; Okamura, T.-A.; Yamamoto, H.; Ueyama, N.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 969-972. (b) Kanamori, D.; Okamura,
T.-A.; Yamamoto, H.; Shimizu, S.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Ueyama, N. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 2004, 77, 2057-2064. (c) Suezawa, H.; Hirota, M.; Yuzuri, T.;
Hamada, Y.; Takeuchi, I.; Sugiura, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2000, 73,
2335-2339. (d) Suezawa, H.; Hirota, M.; Hamada, Y.; Takeuchi, I.;
Kawabe, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64, 2863-2864. (e) Endo, H.;
Hirota, M.; Ito, Y.; Takeuchi, I.; Hamada, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982,
55, 1564-1567.
9948 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 26, 2007