report also discloses the PdCl2-catalyzed cycloisomerization
of 4-nonyne-1,9-diol (1a) to yield selectively [4.6] spiroketal
3 in 60% yield (Scheme 1).8 In our hands, however, a 2.5:1
AuCl3 (entry 4) afforded rather low yields of endo/exo
mixtures in ratios ranging from 1.3:1 to 2.2:1.11 Gratifyingly,
we found that PtII salts were effective and 6-exo selective
hydroalkoxylation catalysts (entries 5 and 6). Although
Zeise’s dimer was slightly less selective than PtCl2 (30:1 vs
116:1), it was a more efficient catalyst consuming starting
material in less than 30 min at room temperature and 1 mol
% catalyst loading.
Scheme 1
Compared to substrate 1b, TBS-protected variant 1c
yielded spiroketal 210 with only a slight reduction in
selectivity (20:1 vs 30:1, entries 1 and 2, Table 2) but higher
mixture of [4.6] and [5.5] spiroketals 3 and 2 was consistently
obtained.9 We did not find this surprising considering that
reduced selectivity could stem from the fact that both primary
alcohols could react at comparable rates (i.e., a chemose-
lectivity issue) and with their own inherent endo-dig or exo-
dig preference (i.e., a regioselectivity issue). We therefore
decided to use mono-hydroxyalkynes as substrates in a screen
to identify regioselective hydroalkoxylation catalysts.
In Table 1, we present our results with alkynol 1b.10 Con-
trary to expectation, we found that most catalysts delivered
Table 2. Pt(II)-Catalyzed 6-exo Selective Hydroalkoxylation
product
(ratio)b
yield
(%)b
entry
R
derivatizationa
1
2
3
4
5
6
OTHP (1b) CSA, MeCN/H2O; MgSO4 2:3 (30:1)
OTBS (1c) CSA, MeCN/H2O; MgSO4 2:3 (20:1)
75
83
Table 1. Catalyst Screening for the Hydroalkoxylation of 1b
OTBS (1c) THF/H2O, 23 °C, 5 min
4c:5c (30:1) 84
OAc (1d)
n-Pr (1e)
n-Pr (1e)
PPTS, MeOH, HC(OMe)3 6d:7d (13:1) 94
PPTS, MeOH, HC(OMe)3 6e:7e (7:1)
THF/H2O, 23 °C, 5 min 4e:5e (7:1)
92
87
a See the Supporting Information for details. b Total yield and endo:exo
ratio (2:3, 4:5, or 6:7) determined by GC with an external standard (entries
1 and 2), NMR (entries 4-6), or isolated yield (entry 3).
entry
mol % catalyst
1% PdCl2
1% MeAuPPh3, 10% TfOH
5% ClAuPPh3/AgOTf (1:1)
5% AuCl3
time (h) yielda (%) ratioa
1b
2
3
4
5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
52
40
36
41
64
75
2:1
1.3:1
2:1
2.2:1
116:1
30:1
overall yield (83% vs 75%). Alternatively, the addition of
moist THF upon completion of the PtII-catalyzed cyclo-
isomerization of 1c yielded δ-hydroxyketone 4c in 84% yield
(30:1; entry 3), demonstrating the stability of the TBS-
protecting group to the reaction conditions. Similar conditions
yielded δ-hydroxyketone 4e from 4-dodecynol (1e) (entry
6). Entries 4 and 5 show that methylacetals are also accessible
in high yields by the addition of an acidic MeOH/HC(OMe)3
solution after completion of the cycloisomerization.
2% PtCl2
1% [Cl2Pt(CH2dCH2)]2
24c
0.5
6
a Yields (at >95% conversion) and ratios (6-exo:7-endo) determined by
GC with an external standard. b MeCN was used instead of Et2O. c <5%
conversion at 30 min.
mixtures resulting from 6-exo-dig and 7-endo-dig cyclization.
Having found a solution for the 6-exo selective hydro-
alkoxylation, we next examined the more intricate 5-exo/6-
endo problem associated with the hydroalkoxylation of
4-alkynols. As shown in Table 3, PtII-catalyzed hydroalkoxy-
lation of 8b-g followed by derivatization as before10
furnished the corresponding spiroketals 2, 3 and methylac-
etals 6d-g, 9d-g favoring the 6-endo derived products
(entries 1-7). Interestingly, δ-tetrahydropyranyloxy substitu-
tion has a beneficial impact on endo-selectivity (9-11:1;
entries 1 and 2), followed to a lesser extent by silyloxy
substitution (entry 3, 3.7:1). Acetoxy, methoxy, and (meth-
Thus, PdCl2 (entry 1), cationic gold(I) (entries 2 and 3) and
(4) For examples catalyzed by gold(I): (a) Teles, J. H.; Brode, S.;
Chabanas, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1415. (b) Mizushima, E.;
Sato, K.; Hayashi, T.; Tanaka, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4563.
(c) Roembke, P.; Schmidbaur, H.; Cronje, S.; Raubenheimer, H. J. Mol.
Catal. 2004, 212, 35. By gold(III): (d) Fukuda, Y.; Utimoto, K. J. Org.
Chem. 1991, 56, 3729. By platinum(II): (e) Jennings, P. W.; Hartman, J.
W.; Hiscox, W. C. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 222, 317. (f) Kataoka, Y.;
Matsumoto, O.; Tani, K. Organometallics 1996, 15, 5246. (g) Hartman, J.
W.; Sperry, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3787. By palladium(II): (h)
Imi, K.; Imai, K.; Utimoto, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3127.
(5) For regioselective hydration controlled by participation of keto or
ether neighboring groups, see ref 4e,h.
(6) Utimoto, K. Pure Appl. Chem. 1983, 55, 1845.
(7) For a PtII-catalyzed hydration of 3- and 4-pentyn-1-ol, see: Lucey,
D. W.; Atwood, J. D. Organometallics 2002, 21, 2481.
(10) All reactions documented in Tables 1-3 (aprotic solvents) yielded
mixtures of cycloisomerization products (endo-enol and E/Z-mixtures of
exo-enol ethers). These were derivatized after completion of the reaction
to spiroketals (Tables 1-3) or acetals (Tables 2 and 3) to facilitate GC and
NMR analyses.
(11) Triflic acid, AgOTf, ClAuPPh3, and PdCl2(PhCN)2 were all
incompetent catalysts for the cycloisomerization of 1b.
(8) For a nice application in total synthesis, see: Trost, B. M.; Horne,
D. B.; Woltering, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5987.
(9) No experimental details regarding isolation, purification, and deter-
mination of selectivity were provided in the Utimoto paper.6 We added
camphorsulphonic acid and MgSO4 at the end of the reaction to ensure
complete conversion to the spiroketals (>95%) for GC analysis.
4908
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 21, 2006