Transient Germylenes and Digermenes in Solution
A R T I C L E S
values of λmax varying between 320 nm20 and 450 nm23 in
hydrocarbon solution at room temperature. Similarly, there is
poor consensus as to the position of the UV spectral maximum
of Me2Ge, with reported values varying between 320 and 490
nm.24 The spectra reported here for the three germylenes are
similar to those reported previously for the corresponding
silylene derivatives Me2Si (λmax ) 465 nm in cyclohexane at
∼20 °C51,52), Ph2Si (λmax ) 495 nm in 3-methylpentane at 77
K53), and Mes2Si (λmax ) 580 nm in cyclohexane at 25 °C54);
analogous similarities exist between the spectra of 6b and 6c
and those of tetramesityldisilene (λmax ) 420 nm in cyclohexane
at 25 °C54a) and tetramethyldisilene (λmax ) 360 nm in
cyclohexane at 22 °C54b), respectively. A reinvestigation of the
time-resolved spectroscopy of 1 and a similar study of an
analogue of 3 is in progress; the preliminary results of this work
are in fact fully compatible with the present results for 4a.55
Nevertheless, we decided to compare the germylene and
digermene spectra obtained in the present work with the results
of time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calcula-
tions, to establish the validity of our transient assignments
further.
larly, the calculated structural parameters for digermene (Ge2H4)
and 6c agree well with the results of previous calculations for
the two molecules.63-68 In the cases of 6a and 6b, the calculated
bond distances are generally in good agreement with crystal-
lographic data reported for tetrakis(2,6-diethylphenyl)digermene
(22),69 but the GedGe distances are overestimated by as much
as 0.1 Å. More serious deviations from the crystallographic
structure are observed in the bond and torsional angles about
the germanium atoms, and the calculations predict a much
greater degree of pyramidalization at germanium than is
observed in the crystal structure of 22.
Although the dimensions of the structures calculated here for
6a and 6b fall within the experimentally observed range for 22
and are in agreement with theoretical studies of smaller
molecules,70-72 the results for all digermenes must be taken with
caution. The accurate prediction of the structure of compounds
containing double bonds between heavy Group 14 elements is
notoriously difficult; the potential surfaces are fairly flat73
resulting in great variability of the GedGe bond distance
(2.213-2.454 Å), the pyramidalization angle (∼0-45°), and
the twist angle (<10°).3,69,74,75
TD-DFT Calculations of the Electronic Spectra of Ger-
mylenes and Digermenes. The choice of basis set and density
functional used in the calculations was made by first carrying
out a series of geometry optimizations for the stable germylene
20 and comparing the results to the reported single-crystal X-ray
structure of the compound.56 Four functionals were investigated,
Preliminary TD-DFT calculations were then carried out for
20 to identify the best basis set and exchange-correlation model
for the prediction of electronic transitions in these species. The
best balance between accuracy (as defined by the degree of
agreement with the experimental UV spectrum56) and computa-
tion time was obtained using the statistical average of different
model potentials for occupied KS orbitals (SAOP)76,77 with
triple-ú double-polarization basis sets and the inclusion of
relativistic effects (ZORA formalism). The basis sets were
reduced to triple-ú single-polarization to expedite the calcula-
tions for the digermenes.
The calculated lowest energy transitions in the UV-visible
spectra of the three germylenes and the corresponding di-
germenes studied in this work are collected in Table 2, along
with the experimental absorption maxima determined by laser
flash photolysis of 4a-c. Calculated and experimental λmax
values for 20 are also included in the table. There is excellent
using uncontracted Slater-type orbitals (STOs) of triple-ú quality
as basis functions (see Supporting Information). The exchange
and correlation functionals of Perdew and Wang (PW91) were
found to afford the best agreement with the reported crystal-
lographic data for 20 and were thus used in subsequent geometry
optimizations for the other species investigated. The calculated
R-Ge distances and R-Ge-R bond angles (R ) H or C) for
H2Ge, Me2Ge, and Ph2Ge (see Supporting Information) and
vibrational frequencies for H2Ge agreed well with the results
of previous calculations at other levels of theory1,57-61 and with
experimental structural data for H2Ge62 and the stable diarylger-
mylene bis[2,6-bis(1-naphthyl)phenyl]germylene (21).59 Simi-
(57) BelBruno, J. J. Heteroatom. Chem. 1998, 9, 195.
(58) Su, M.-D.; Chu, S.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11478.
(59) Wegner, G. L.; Berger, R. J. F.; Schier, A.; Schmidbaur, H. Organometallics
2001, 20, 418.
(60) Szabados, A.; Hargittai, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 4314.
(61) Lemierre, V.; Chrostowska, A.; Dargelos, A.; Baylere, P.; Leigh, W. J.;
Harrington, C. R. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 18, 000.
(62) Karolczak, J.; Harper, W. W.; Grev, R. S.; Clouthier, D. J. J. Chem. Phys.
1995, 103, 2839.
(63) Liang, C.; Allen, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1039.
(64) Grev, R. S.; Schaefer, H. F., III Organometallics 1992, 11, 3489.
(65) Chen, W.-C.; Su, M.-D.; Chu, S.-Y. Organometallics 2001, 20, 564.
(66) Malcolm, N. O. J.; Gillespie, R. J.; Popelier, P. L. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 2002, 3333.
(67) Mosey, N. J.; Baines, K. M.; Woo, T. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
13306.
(68) Wang, X.; Andrews, L.; Kushto, G. P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 5809.
(69) Snow, J. T.; Murakami, S.; Masamune, S.; Williams, D. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1984, 25, 4191.
(70) Trinquier, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2130.
(71) Grev, R. S.; Schaefer, H. F., III; Baines, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 9458.
(51) Levin, G.; Das, P. K.; Lee, C. L. Organometallics 1988, 7, 1231.
(52) Levin, G.; Das, P. K.; Bilgrien, C.; Lee, C. L. Organometallics 1989, 8,
1206.
(53) Michalczyk, M. J.; Fink, M. J.; De Young, D. J.; Carlson, C. W.; Welsh,
K. M.; West, R.; Michl, J. Silicon, Germanium, Tin and Lead Compounds
1986, 9, 750.
(72) Windus, T. L.; Gordon, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9559.
(73) Jacobsen, H.; Ziegler, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3667.
(74) Batcheller, S. A.; Tsumuraya, T.; Tempkin, O.; Davis, W. M.; Masamune,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9394.
(54) (a) Conlin, R. T.; Netto-Ferreira, J. C.; Zhang, S.; Scaiano, J. C.
Organometallics 1990, 9, 1332. (b) Yamaji, M.; Hamanishi, K.; Takahashi,
T.; Shizuka, H. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1994, 81, 1.
(55) Leigh, W. J.; Chan, B. R.; Harrington, C. R.; Gaspar, P. P. Time-resolved
spectroscopic studies of the photochemistry of some diphenylgermylene
precursors. To be submitted.
(75) Schafer, A.; Saak, W.; Weidenbruch, M.; Marsmann, H.; Henkel, G. Chem.
Ber./Recl. 1997, 130, 1733.
(76) Gritsenko, O. V.; Schipper, P. R. T.; Baerends, E. J. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1999, 302, 199.
(56) Kira, M.; Ishida, S.; Iwamoto, T.; Ichinohe, M.; Kabuto, C.; Ignatovich,
L.; Sakurai, H. Chem. Lett. 1999, 263.
(77) Schipper, P. R. T.; Gritsenko, O. V.; van Gisbergen, S. J. A.; Baerends, E.
J. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 112, 1344.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 49, 2004 16111