9524
N. Brosse et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 9521–9524
to govern the aggregation of individual compounds via a
hydrogen bonds network while the hydrophobic parts
could affect the intrinsic flexibility and the fiber–fiber
interactions. In accordance with previous works,7 struc-
tural variations of the side chain of the aminoacid affect
the solubility and the efficiency of the intermolecular
overlap of the aggregation process and so allowed mod-
ulations of the gelation properties. Thus, in an aromatic
solvent, the p-stacking appears to be an important
contributor to the gelation phenomenon whereas the
presence of aliphatic moiety seems to enhance the
gelation of aliphatic solvent. Depending on the nature
of the gelator used, the structure of the aggregates
ranges from a fibrous to a lamellar morphology. Some
of the organogelators described in this paper are able
to form, even at low concentration, gels with good
thermal stabilities.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank EEIGM (Ecole Europeenne
´
´
´
´
dÕIngenieurs en Genie des Materiaux) and Pierre Bec-
king for his assistance with microscopy experiments.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
for the supercritical drying of the organogels are availa-
ble in Supporting informations.
References and notes
1. Review: (a) Terech, P.;Weiss, R. G. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97,
3133–3159;(b) Estroff, L. A.;Hamilton, A. D. Chem. Rev.
2004, 104, 1201–1217;(c) Selection of recent papers:
Schmidt, R.;Adam, F. B.;Michel, M.;Schmutz, M.;
4. Experimental
´
Decher, G.;Me sini, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3171–
4.1. Procedure for the preparation of 2a
3174;(d) Suzuki, M.;Nigawara, T.;Yumoto, M.;Kimura,
M.;Shirai, H.;Hanabusa, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
6841–6843;(e) Becerril, J.;Hanabusa, K.;Okui, K.;
Karaki, K.;Koyama, T.;Shirai, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Step (a): L-Phenylalanine methylester hydrochloride
(10.75g, 50mmol.) was dissolved in aqueous saturated
NaHCO3 solution (200mL) and benzylchlorocarbonate
(8.5g, 50mmol) was added under vigorous stirring. Stir-
ring was continued overnight. The solution was ex-
tracted with ether (three times). The combined organic
layers were washed with HCl 1N, dried under MgSO4,
and concentrated at reduce pressure. The excess of benz-
ylchlorocarbonate was removed using a short column
chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether;the product
was chromatographed with 40% EtOAc/petroleum
ether) to give 14g (90%) of pure product. Step (b):
Hydrazine hydrate (5g, 100mmol) was added to a solu-
tion of N-benzyloxycarbonyl-L-phenylalanine methyl
ester (10g, 32mmol) in methanol (100mL). The mixture
was stirred overnight at room temperature and the
hydrazide was collected by filtration, washed with meth-
anol, and dried (7.8g, 78%). Step (c): The hydrazide
derivative (2g, 6.3mmol) was added to a suspension of
naphthalic anhydride (1.26g, 6.3mmol) in toluene
(200mL) and the resulting mixture was refluxed, the
water formed during the reaction was trapped in a
Dean–Stark receiver. After 6h, the solution was cooled
and quickly transformed into a gelatinous mass, which
was evaporated in vacuo to dryness. The solid residue
was recrystallized in CHCl3. 1H NMR (300MHz,
CDCl3) of 2a: d 8.85 (s, 1H), 8.65–8.45 (m, 2H), 8.20
(d, 2H), 7.80–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.10 (m, 10H), 5.63
(m, 1H), 5.15–5.00 (m, 2H), 5.00–4.75 (m, 1H), 3.38
(dd, 1H), 3.18 (dd, 1H).
´
Commun. 1992, 1371–1372;(f) Carre , A.;Le Grel, P.;
Baudy-FlocÕh, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1887–1889;
(g) Makarevic, J.;Jokic, M.;Frkanec, L.;Katalenic, D.;
Zinic, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2002, 2238–2239;
(h) Okabe, S.;Ando, K.;Ihara, H.;Sakurai, T.;Yamada,
T.;Hashimoto, T.;Takafuji, M.;Sagawa, T.;Hachisako,
H. Langmuir 2002, 18, 7120–7123;(i) Hanabusa, K.;
Shibayama, M. J. Polym. Sci. B 2004, 42, 1841–1848;(j)
Escuder, B.;Luis, S. V.;Miravet, J. F.;Querol, M. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 2002, 738–739;(k) Brinksma, J.;
Feringa, B. L.;Kellogg, R. M.;Vreekler, R.;van Esch, J.
Langmuir 2000, 16, 9249–9255;(l) Hamilton, A. D.;Wang,
G. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1954–1961.
2. Koumoto, K.;Yamashita, T.;Kimura, T.;Luboradzki, R.;
Shinkai, S. Nanotechnology 2001, 12, 25–31;Hamada, D.;
Yanagihara, I.;Tsumoto, K. Trends in Biotechnol. 2004, 22,
93–97;de Loos, M.;van Esch, J.;Kellog, R. M.;Feringa,
B. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 613–616.
´
3. (a) Brosse, N.;Pinto, M.-F.;Jamart-Gre goire, B. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 4370–4374;(b) Brosse, N.;Pinto, M.-F.;
´
Bodiguel, J.;Jamart-Gre goire, B. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
2869–2873;(c) Brosse, N.;Pinto, M.-F.;Jamart-Gre goire,
´
B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 23(24), 4757–4764.
4. Terech, P.;Rossat, C.;Volino, F. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
2000, 227, 363–370.
5. Makarevic, J.;Jokic, M.;Raza, Z.;Stephanic, Z.;Kojic-
Prodic, B.;Zinic, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 5567–5580.
6. Terech, P.;Pasquier, D.;Bordas, V.;Rossat, C. Langmuir
2000, 16, 4485–4494.
7. Terech, P.;Bouas-Laurent, H.;Desvergne, J.-P. J. Colloid.
Sci. 1995, 174, 258–263.