U. Herber et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 689 (2004) 4917–4920
4919
Table 1
ipso-C of p-tol), 137.4, 134.6 (both s, para-C of p-tol),
132.5, 128.6, 127.9, 122.7 (all s, ortho-C and meta-C of
p-tol), 96.7, 95.7 (both s, CH of acac), 29.1 (s, CH3 of
acac), 24.7 (s, PCH3), 21.2 (s, CH3 of p-tol). 31P CP/
MAS NMR (162.0 MHz): d 5.7 [d, J(Rh,P) = 119.6
Hz]. Found: C, 58.98; H, 5.54; Rh, 22.87%.
˚
Selected bond distances (A) and bond angles (ꢁ) with estimated SD for
compound 3
Bond distances
Rh(1)–Rh(2)
Rh(1)–P
2.242(3)
2.4011(15)
1.947(5)
2.135(4)
2.173(5)
1.958(5)
Rh(2)–C(2)
Rh(2)–C(3)
Rh(1)–O(3)
Rh(1)–O(4)
Rh(2)–O(1)
Rh(2)–O(2)
2.074(5)
2.018(4)
2.147(3)
2.169(3)
2.156(3)
2.098(3)
Rh(1)–C(1)
Rh(1)–C(2)
Rh(1)–C(3)
Rh(2)–C(1)
3: A solid sample of 90 mg (0.10 mmol) of 2 was
added to 20 ml of acetone, which was cooled at ꢁ50
ꢁC and saturated with CO. The solution was slowly
warmed to r.t. and stirred for 1 h. The solvent was evap-
orated in vacuo and the residue recrystallized from 15
ml of pentane. After the solution was stored at ꢁ20
ꢁC for 12 h, red crystals precipitated which were washed
with small amounts of pentane (ꢁ20 ꢁC) and dried in va-
cuo; yield 70 mg (78%), m.p. (dec.) 108 ꢁC. Anal. Calc.
for C44H51O5PRh2: C, 58.94; H, 5.73; Rh, 22.95. IR
Bond angles
Rh(1)–C(1)–Rh(2)
Rh(1)–C(2)–Rh(2)
Rh(1)–C(3)–Rh(2)
C(1)–Rh(1)–C(2)
C(1)–Rh(2)–C(2)
C(2)–Rh(1)–C(3)
C(2)–Rh(2)–C(3)
80.2(2)
C(2)–Rh(2)–O(1)
P–Rh(1)–C(1)
P–Rh(1)–C(2)
176.93(16)
96.40(16)
96.59(14)
175.01(11)
85.44(12)
84.16(13)
132.89(4)
73.42(14)
73.70(16)
81.04(18)
82.3(2)
P–Rh(1)–C(3)
O(3)–Rh(1)–O(4)
O(1)–Rh(2)–O(2)
P–Rh(1)–Rh(2)
88.34(17)
94.37(13)
(C6H6): m(CO) 1822, m(COacac) 1584, 1516 cmꢁ1 1H
.
NMR (C6D6, 200 MHz): 7.53, 7.13 (both m, 8H,
ortho-H of p-tol), 7.02, 6.91, 6.73, 6.62 [all d,
J(H,H) = 8.4 Hz, 8H, meta-H of p-tol), 5.46, 4.96 (both
s, 2H, CH of acac), 2.22, 2.12, 1.98, 1.26 (all s, 12H, CH3
of acac), 1.91, 1.79 (both s, 12H, CH3 of p-tol), 0.76 [d,
J(P,H) = 9.1 Hz, 9H, PCH3]. 31P NMR (C6D6, 81.0
In summarizing, the present investigations have
shown that the size of the entering PR3 ligand has a sig-
nificant influence on the course of the reaction of the
starting material 1 with trialkylphosphines. While upon
treatment of 1 with the bulky PiPr3, apart from the dis-
placement of the bridging stibine ligand, an unusual
intramolecular rearrangement occurs, involving the
migration of one acetylacetonato ligand from one rho-
dium center to the next, the reaction of 1 with the less
bulky PMe3 proceeds along a different route. Although
the initially formed product 2 is rather labile, the 13C
CP/MAS NMR spectrum as well as the subsequent
addition of CO confirms that also in the intermediate
the two Rh(acac) fragments have been preserved. De-
spite the fact that the above-mentioned Rh(0)–Rh(II)
complexes ½ðPR03ÞRhðl-CR2Þ RhðacacÞ ꢀ are quite stable
1
3
MHz): ꢁ5.2 [dd, J(Rh,P) = 129.7, J(Rh,P) = 7.6 Hz].
Found: C, 59.26; H, 5.41; Rh, 22.21%.
Crystal data for 6: Crystals were obtained from pen-
tane at ꢁ20 ꢁC. C44H51O5PRh2, Mr = 896.64; triclinic,
˚
ꢀ
˚
space group P1 (no. 2), Z = 2, a = 10.7783(18) A,
˚
b = 13.895(3) A, c = 14.795(2) A, a = 78.38(2)ꢁ,
3
˚
b = 74.634(19)ꢁ, c = 74.42(2)ꢁ, V = 2037.7(6) A ,
Dcalc = 1.461 g cmꢁ3, k = 0.71073 A, T = 173(2) K,
˚
l(Mo Ka) = 0.892 mmꢁ1. Crystal size 0.21 · 0.19 ·
0.18 mm3; 2Hmax = 50.06ꢁ; 21,424 reflections were meas-
ured, 6772 of these were independent (Rint = 0.0649) and
employed in the structure refinement (481 parameters).
2
2
[2], attempts to transform 3 into the mixed-valence com-
pound [(PMe3)Rh{l-C(p-tol)2}2Rh(acac)2] failed.
The
R values are R1 = 0.0412 and wR2 = 0.0947
[I > 2r(I)] and R1 = 0.0590 and wR2 = 0.1015 (all data);
reflex/parameter ratio = 14.1; min/max residual electron
density: 0.927/ꢁ1.461 e Aꢁ3. Data were collected on a
˚
3. Experimental section
IPDS diffractometer from Stoe.
A semi-empirical
The experiments were carried out under an atmos-
phere of argon by Schlenk techniques. The starting
material 1 was prepared as described in the literature
[2]. Melting points were measured by differential thermal
analysis (DTA). Abbreviations used: s, singlet; d, dou-
blet; m, multiplet.
2: A solution of 120 mg (0.12 mmol) of 1 in 15 ml of
pentane was cooled at ꢁ50 ꢁC and treated dropwise with
60 ll (0.60 mmol) of trimethylphosphine. The solution
was slowly warmed to r.t. and stirred for 30 min. A
red solid precipitated, which was separated from the
mother liquor, washed three times with 10 ml of pentane
each and dried in vacuo; yield 96 mg (92%), m.p. (dec.)
102 ꢁC. Anal. Calc. for C43H51O4PRh2: C, 59.46; H,
5.92; Rh, 23.69. 13C CP/MAS NMR (100.6 MHz): d
186.7, 183.9 (both s, CO of acac), 151.3, 145.2 (both s,
absorption correction was applied. The structure was
solved by direct methods (SHELXS-97) [10] and refined
against F2 by least-squares (SHELXS-97) [11]. All non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The posi-
tions of all hydrogen atoms were calculated according
˚
to ideal geometry (distance C–H 0.95 A) and used only
in structure factor calculations.
4. Supplementary material
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors)
for the structure analysis have been deposited with the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC No.
232920 for compound 3. Copies of this information
may be obtained free of charge on application to the