L. Fang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 173–176
175
B.; Pianet, I.; Laguerre, M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7034–
7039; (b) Kaur, S.; Kumar, S. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2840–
2841; (c) Torrado, A.; Walkup, G. K.; Imperiali, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 609–610; (d) Dujols, V.; Ford, F.;
Czarnik, A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7386–7387; (e)
Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Pallavicini, P.; Sacchi, D.;
Taglietti, A. Analyst 1996, 121, 1763–1768; (f) de Silva, A.
P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A. J.
M.; McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.; Rice, T. E. Chem.
Rev. 1997, 97, 1515–1566; (g) Metivier, R.; Leray, I.;
Valeur, B. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4480–4490.
Figure 2. Electron circulation of the energy transfer process (double-
electron exchange mechanism) involving an excited fluorophore and a
d9 metal ion.
2. (a) Lee, A. W. M.; Chan, W. H.; Jiang, L. S.; Poon, K. W.
Chem. Commun. 1997, 611–612; (b) Chan, W. H.; Lee, A.
W. M.; Jiang, L. S.; Mak, T. C. M. Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 1997, 8, 2501–2504; (c) Lin, J.; Chan, W. H.; Lee, A.
W. M.; Wong, W. Y. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 13983–
13998.
3. (a) Zhang, H.; Chan, W. H.; Lee, A. W. M.; Wong, W. Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 395–397; (b) Zhang, H.; Chan,
W. H.; Lee, A. W. M.; Xia, P. F.; Wong, W. Y. Lett. Org.
Chem. 2004, 1, 63–66.
Table 1. The complex stability (Ks) constant of 5a–f versus different
metal ions (104 MÀ1
)
Ks
Ru3+
Cu2+
Fe3+
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
1.2 0.1
1.7 0.2
1.4 0.1
1.2 0.1
4.8 0.5
1.7 0.2
0.57 0.06
0.71 0.08
0.55 0.06
0.68 0.08
0.53 0.06
0.68 0.07
1.8 0.2
2.0 0.2
1.9 0.2
1.7 0.2
1.9 0.2
1.8 0.2
4. Yang, R. H.; Chan, W. H.; Lee, A. W. M.; Xia, P. F.;
Zhang, H. K.; Li, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2884–
2885.
5. Synthetic procedure and characterization data of selected
compound: 4e: The mixture of 3e (200mg) and 1-pyrene-
carboxyaldehyde (200mg) in 30mL dry benzene was
refluxed for overnight under nitrogen protection. The
cooled solution was refrigerated and the precipitate formed
was filtered out. The solid obtained was washed by diethyl
ether (3 · 15mL) to afford bright yellow powders as the
pure nitrone product 4e (230mg, 60%). 1H NMR
(270MHz, CDCl3) d: 5.31 (s, 2H), 5.42 (s, H), 7.03–7.13
(m, 3H), 7.36–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.61–7.64 (m, 1H), 7.94–8.22
(m, 8H), 8.48–8.54 (m, 2H), 9.90 (d, J = 8.4Hz, 1H). 13C
NMR (67MHz, CDCl3) d: 67.2, 71.0, 112.1, 121.2, 121.3,
121.3, 121.5, 121.9, 122.5, 122.7, 123.5, 125.0, 125.5, 125.9,
125.9, 126.0, 127.5, 128.3, 128.3, 130.3, 130.8, 132.2, 132.5,
136.8, 148.9, 149.1, 156.4, 156.6. 5e: Nitrone 4e (167mg)
and 1,3-propene sultone (49mg) in 20mL of toluene was
heated to reflux under the nitrogen atmosphere for 48h.
After removal of toluene and the residue was purified by
flash chromatography column (diluted by petroleum ether:
ethyl acetate = 1.5:1) to give pale yellow solid 5e as the pure
product (72mg, 34%). Mp > 230ꢁC (decomposed). 1H
NMR (270MHz, CDCl3) d: 4.05 (d, J = 3.8Hz, 2H), 4.35
(dd, J1 = 11.1Hz, J2 = 3.0Hz, 2H), 4.50 (d, J = 11.1Hz,
1H), 4.83 (s, 2H), 5.23 (br, 1H), 5.33 (dd, J1 = 6.75Hz,
J2 = 2.97Hz, 1H), 6.592–6.959 (m, 5H), 7.07–7.16 (m, 1H),
7.37–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.90–8.20 (m, 9H), 8.64 (d, J = 9.5Hz,
1H). 13C NMR (67MHz, CDCl3): 53.9, 69.1, 70.3, 80.2,
111.6, 1129, 120.0, 120.6, 121.1, 1219, 124.4, 124.7, 125.0,
125.5, 125.5, 126.1, 127.1, 128.1, 128.3, 128.7, 128.9, 130.4,
130.9, 131.1, 131.7, 136.0, 136.9, 148.3, 149.1, 155.8, 156.5.
IR (KBr): 759.39, 849.06, 948.37, 1041.76, 1158.06,
1242.29, 1367.65cmÀ1. HRMS (TOF MS): C33H27N2O5S,
calcd: 563.1640, found: 563.1617.
tive to the formation of a 1:1 complex. It is noteworthy
that Ru(III) and Fe(III) exhibited stronger quenching
abilities than that of Cu(II).
Changing the structure of the sidearm groups of 5a–f
gave no different Ks except for 5e with Ruthenium(III).
It may due to the too weak binding abilities of polyether
and ester groups in 5b–d and 5f toward metal cations.
On the other hand, the imide and sultone moiety incor-
porating into the fluorescent materials seemingly exerted
no influence to the chelation. Higher Ks observable for
the complex of 5e and Ru(III) demonstrates the poten-
tial means to improve the binding capacity of a sensor
by modification of the N-sidearm of isoxazolidine deriv-
atives. If the chelating group on the benzyl o-sidearm is
strong enough, a sensor with highly affinity and selectiv-
ity to Ru(III) or Fe(III) based on isoxazolidine structure
could be developed.
In summary, we have synthesized isoxazolidine-contain-
ing fluorophores 5a–f in considerable yields by a con-
venient procedure, we also studied their selective
complexation toward Fe(III), Cu(II), and Ru(III), which
provides us a new insight into the design of chemosen-
sors for transition metals.
Acknowledgements
6. (a) Photoinduced Electron Transfer; Fox, M. A., Chanon,
M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amesterdam, 1988; Parts A–D; (b)
Wasielewski, M. R. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 435–461; (c)
Kavarnos, G. J. Fundamentals of Photo-Induced Electron
Transfer; VCH: Weinheim, NY, 1993; (d) Kavarnos, G. J.;
Turro, N. J. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 401–449.
The work described in this paper was partly supported
by a grant from the University Grants Committee of
the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
(Project No. AoE/P-10/01) and a grant from Hong
Kong Baptist University (FRG/03-04/II-15).
7. The UV–visible absorption spectra of 2a–f (5 · 10À6 M)
with different cations (20equiv) in acetonitrile was meas-
ured in the wavelength range of 300–380nm
(kmax = 342nm). It is impossible to analyze the details of
absorption change when RuCl3, FeCl3, and CuCl2 were
added to the hosts because these inorganic compounds
References and notes
1. Selected recent publication regarding this field: (a) Bode-
nant, B.; Weil, T.; Businelli-Pourcel, M.; Fages, F.; Barbe,