Communications
Keywords: carbenes · density functional calculations ·
.
palladium · phosphorus · sulfides
[1] See for example: a) A. J. Arduengo III, Acc. Chem. Res. 1999,
32,913 – 921; b) W. A. Herrmann,T. Weskamp,V. P. W. Bohm,
Adv. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 48,1 – 69; c) W. A. Herrmann,
Angew. Chem. 2002, 114,1342 – 1363; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2002, 41,1290 – 1309.
Scheme 2.
[2] D. Bourissou,O. Guerret,F. P. Gabbai,G. Bertrand, Chem. Rev.
2000, 100,39 – 91.
calculations using the ONIOM method (same level of theory
[3] See for example: a) J. Ruiz,M. E. G. Mosquera,G. Garcia,E.
Patron,V. Riera,S. Garcia-Granda,F. Van der Maelen, Angew.
Chem. 2003, 115,4915 – 4919; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
4767 – 4771; b) T. Cantat,N. MØzailles,N. Maigrot,L. Ricard,P.
Le Floch, Chem. Commun. 2004,1274 – 1275.
than in 3) yielded a structure which is very close to that
experimentally observed. NBO calculations indicate that the
palladium-bound carbon atom still bears a substantial neg-
ative charge (qC = ꢀ1.02 and qPd = + 0.36).
[4] Phosphoniumphosphanylcarbene ions [(R2P)(R2PH)CD]+ exist as
free species,see: M. Soleilhavoup,A. Baceiredo,O. Treutler,R.
Ahlrichs,M. Nieger,G. Bertrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
10959 – 10961.
In conclusion,we have developed an easy synthetic access
to a new type of nucleophilic “carbene” complex featuring
two pendant thiophosphinoyl ancillary ligands. Theoretical
calculations indicate that these new species can be either
regarded as a coordinated dianion with a strong delocaliza-
[5] a) R. G. Cavell,R. P. Kamalesh Babu,A. Kasani,R. McDonald,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,5805 – 5806; b) R. P. Kamalesh
Babu,R. McDonald,S. A. Drecker,M. Klobukowski,R. G.
Cavell, Organometallics 1999, 18,4226 – 4229; c) R. P. Kama-
lesh Babu,R. McDonald,R. G. Cavell, Organometallics 2000,
ꢀ
tion of the charge onto the two P C bonds,or as a
nucleophilic carbene complex.
19,3462 – 3465; d) K. Aparana,M. Ferguson,R. G. Cavell,
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,726 – 727; e) R. G. Cavell,R.
J.
Experimental Section
Kamalesh Babu,K. Aparana, J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 617–
618,158 – 169; f) K. Aparana,R. P. Kamalesh Babu,R. McDo-
nald,R. G. Cavell, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113,4535 – 4537; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40,4400 – 4402; g) N. D. Jones,G. Lin,R. A.
Gossage,R. McDonald,R. C. Cavell, Organometallics, 2003, 22,
2832 – 2841; h) G. Lin,N. D. Jones,A. Gossage,R. McDonald,
R. G. Cavell, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115,4188 – 4191; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42,4054 – 4057.
All experiments were carried out under dry argon or nitrogen
atmosphere using distilled and degassed solvents.
3: Two equivalents of MeLi (0.84 mL,1.6 m in diethyl ether,
1.34 mmol) were added to a solution of 1 (300 mg,0.67 mmol) in
toluene (5 mL) at ꢀ788C. The mixture was warmed to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h leading to the formation of a yellow
suspension of 2. Then [PdCl2(PPh3)2] (470 mg,0.67 mmol) was added
in one portion at room temperature. The resulting mixture immedi-
ately turned red and 31P NMR spectroscopy showed the reaction to be
complete by indicating the presence of complex 3 and PPh3. Complex
3 and LiCl are poorly soluble in toluene and were isolated by
centrifugation. Pure complex 3 was finally obtained in 88% yield
[6] a) M. Doux,C. Bouet,N. MØzailles,L. Ricard,P. Le Floch,
Organometallics 2002, 21,2785 – 2788; b) M. Doux,N. MØzailles,
M. Melaïmi,L. Ricard,P. Le Floch,
Chem. Commun. 2002,
1566 – 1567; c) M. Doux,N. MØzailles,L. Ricard,P. Le Floch,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003,3878 – 3894; d) M. Doux,N. MØzailles,
L. Ricard,P. Le Floch, Organometallics 2003, 22,4624 – 4626;
e) M. Doux,L. Ricard,F. Mathey,P. Le Floch,N. MØzailles, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. 2003,687 – 698.
(480 mg,0.59 mmol) after dissolution in CH Cl2 (6 mL) followed by
2
filtration to remove LiCl and evaporation of the solvent. Selected
data: 1H NMR (300 MHz,CD 2Cl2,25 8C): d = 7.13–7.66 ppm (m,
35H; H of phenyl); 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz,CD Cl2,25 8C,85%
2
[7] N. Matsumura,J.-I. Kawano,N. Fukunishi,H. Inoue,
J. Am.
H3PO4 as external standard): d = 21.5 (t, 3J(P,P) = 14.6 Hz; PPh3),
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,3623.
[8] a) A. Kasani,R. P. Kamalesh Babu,R. McDonald,R. G. Cavell,
3
39.8 ppm (d, J(P,P) = 14.6 Hz; PPh2S); 13C{1H} NMR (75.465 MHz,
CD2Cl2,25 8C,CD 2Cl2 d = 53.73 ppm as internal reference): d =
125.4–139.1 ppm (m; C of phenyl),C-Pd not observed; elemental
analysis (%) calcd for C43H35P3PdS2: C 63.35,H 4.33,found: C 62.97,
H 4.05.
Angew. Chem. 1999, 111,1580 – 1582; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1999, 38,1483 – 1484; b) C. M. Ong,D. W. Stephan,
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,2939 – 2940.
J. Am.
[9] Crystal data for 3 (C43H35P3PdS2·1/2(CH2Cl2})): space group
P21/c, a = 9.0270(10), b = 36.1930(10), c = 12.7440(10) , b =
4: Complex 4 was obtained by adding MeI (27 mL,0.43 mmol) to
a solution of 3 (350 mg,0.43 mmol) in CH 2Cl2 (10 mL) at room
temperature. The mixture was stirred for five minutes and then taken
to dryness. Complex 4 was thus isolated in a quantitative yield (100%,
410 mg,0.43 mmol). Selected data: 1H NMR (300 MHz,CD 2Cl2,
258C): d = 1.86 (dt, 3J(H,P) = 16.2 Hz, 4J(H,P) = 8.6 Hz,3H; CH 3),
7.00–8.04 ppm (m,35H; H of phenyl); 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz,
CD2Cl2,25 8C,85% H 3PO4 as external standard): d = 22.8 (t, 3J(P,P) =
15.8 Hz; PPh3),62.3 ppm (d, 3J(P,P) = 15.8 Hz; PPh2S); 13C{1H} NMR
(75.465 MHz,CD 2Cl2,25 8C,CD 2Cl2 d = 53.73 ppm as internal
reference): d = 20.7 (pq, J(C,P) = 5.0 Hz; CH3),125.6 (dt, 1J(C,P) =
109.3620(10)8, V= 3928.2(5) 3, Z = 4, 1calcd = 1.450 gcmꢀ3
,
;
F(000) = 1748,Mo
radiation (l = 0.71073 ), m = 0.800 cmꢀ1
Ka
crystal dimensions 0.20 0.10 0.08 mm. Data collection was
performed on a Nonius KappaCCD single crystal diffractometer
at T= 150 K. Crystal structure was solved with SIR97,[16] refine-
ment against F2 (SHELXL97[17]
) with anisotropic thermal
parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms,calculated hydrogen
positions with riding isotropic thermal parameters. hkl ranges:
ꢀ6 12; ꢀ46 50; ꢀ17 17,22119 reflections collected,11087 unique
(Rint = 0.0445),8922 data with I > 2s(I),444 parameters refined,
GOF(F2) = 1.013,final R indices (R1 = ꢀ j Fo j ꢀ j Fc j j /ꢀ j Fo j ,
2
48.0 Hz, J(C,P) = 8.7 Hz; C-Pd),127.7–135.4 ppm (m; C of phenyl);
wR2 = [ꢀw(F2oꢀF2c)2/ꢀ w(Fo2)2]1/2
, R1 = 0.0403,w R2 = 0.1161,
elemental analysis (%) calcd for C44H38IP3PdS2: C 55.21,H 4.00;
found: C 55.10,H 3.87.
max/min residual electron density 0.973(0.097)/ꢀ1.215(0.097)
e3. Crystal data for 4 are given in the Supporting Information.
CCDC-245083 (3) and CCDC-245084 (4) contains the supple-
mentary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be
Received: July 22,2004
Revised: August 27,2004
6384
ꢀ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6382 –6385