alcohols, a type of compounds more easily available than
halides, could be directly used in the reaction. In this way,
the reaction could be extended to multifunctional substrates
such as phenolic alcohols, providing an expeditious entry
into several classes of polyphenolics of biomedical and
nutritional interest.
Table 1. Synthesis of Vanillyl Nonanoate (4) under Various
Reaction Conditionsa
We reasoned that in the esterification of acids and alcohols
promoted by the Mitsunobu redox couple, phenolic hydroxyls
present on either substrate should essentially behave as “inert
spectators”, even though the reaction has been largely
employed for the synthesis of phenolic ethers.12 Thus, the
SN2-type mechanism of the reaction rules out aromatic
carbons as electrophilic substrates, while the generation of
the nucleophilic species by deprotonation with a stabilized
azaenolate, a relatively weak base,13 secures that carboxylates
rather than phenates are formed, provided that stoichiometric
amounts of reagents are employed.14 This turned out to be
the case, and the excellent results observed in the Mitsnunobu
esterification of vanillic alcohol with nonanoic acid (Table
1) could be extended to the preparation of esters of phenolic
acids related to CAPE (Table 2) and of esters of phenolic
alcohols related to capsiates (Table 3).
R1)COR
R2)COR
R1)COR
R2)H, (4)
R1)H
R2)COR
X
conditions
pyridine
Cl
22%
17%
36%
4%
9%
13%
29%
25%
10%
11%
42%
14%
19%
67%
7%
9%
OCOR
OPiv
OH
OH
OH
pyridine
TEA, DMAP
DCC, DMAP
DEPC,TEA
PPAA, TEA
Yb(OTf)3, THF
DIAD,TPP,THF
20%
18%
19%
Cl
OH
a Reactions were carried out at room temperature on a 2 mmol scale,
with equimolecular amounts of reagents and condensing agents (DCC,
DEPC, PPAA, DIAD-TPP) and catalytic (10%) amounts of promoters
(DMAP, Yb(OTf)3), when indicated. Reactions were worked up after 24 h,
except for the Yb(OTf)3-promoted esterification, which was worked up after
96 h due to a slower conversion. b Isolated yield after column chromatog-
raphy (silica gel, petroleum ether-EtOAc gradient).
satisfactory degree of conversion make this strategy of
limited applicability.6 A certain degree of chemoselectivity
in the esterification of phenolic alcohols was also reported
for Lewis acid-catalyzed acylations,7 a type of reaction that
takes place under more benign conditions than Fischer
esterification. Indeed, at least with the test reaction of Table
1, excellent chemoselectivity was observed in the ytterbium
triflate-promoted esterification.8 However, the yield was
modest, and the long reaction time requested for the reaction
(96 h) made it unsuitable for more hydroxylated and sensitive
substrates. Apart from protection, no other general strategy
seems possible for the esterification of phenolic acids using
acyl activation.9
Switching from carbonyl- to hydroxyl activation would
be a mechanistically rational alternative to the “protection
racket”,10 since phenolic carbons are not substrates for SN2-
type reactions. Thus, the cesium salts of phenolic acids11 have
been reported to react with alkyl halides in a highly
chemoselective way,4 but the modest yield, also with an
excess of halides, leaves margin for further research and
improvement. In particular, the scope and versatility of the
alkyl activation strategy would be substantially improved if
Table 2. Mitsunobu Esterification of Phenolic Acids
R1
R2
R3
X
yield
H
OMe
H
H
H
H
H
H
OH
OMe
OH
PhCH2-
PhCH2-
(Me)2CdCH-
CH3-(CH2)6-
PhCH2-
PhCH2-
PhCH2-
PhCH2-
(E) -CHdCH-
(E) -CHdCH-
(E) -CHdCH-
(E) -CHdCH-
-CH2-CH2-
-CH2-
54%
59%
42%
59%
81%
78%
58%
64%
OH
OMe
OMe
OMe
H
The application to the synthesis of caffeates is worthy of
mention, since the esterification of caffeic acid is notoriously
troublesome15 and has led to alternative protocols based on
(12) (a) Hughes, D. L. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1996, 28, 127-164. (b)
Hughes, D. L. Org. React. 1992, 42, 335-656. (c) Castro, B. R. Org. React.
1983, 29, 1-162. (d) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1-28.
(13) Hughes, D. L.; Reamer, R. A.; Bergan, J. J.; Grabowski, E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6487-6491.
(6) As an example, treatment of caffeic acid with 15 molar equiv of
â-phenethyl alcohol under the conditions of Fischer esterification (p-
toluenesulfonic acid, refluxing overnight in benzene with a Dean-Stark
trap) has been reported to afford CAPE in 35% yield (Burke, T. R., Jr.;
Fesen, M. R.; Mazumder, A.; Wang, J.; Carothers, A. M.; Grunberger, D.;
Driscoll, J.; Kohn, K.; Pommier, Y. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4171-4178).
(7) Chandra, K. L.; Saravanan, P.; Singh, R. K.; Singh, V. K. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 1369-1374.
(8) Damen, E. W. P.; Braamer, L.; Scheeren, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 6081-6082. See also: Holton, R. A.; Zhang, Z.; Clarke, P. A.;
Nadizadeh, H.; Procter, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2883-2886.
(9) Deprotection of polyphenolic esters is often not a trivial operation.
See, for instance: Kim, D. S. H. L.; Kim, J. Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2001, 11, 2541-2543.
(10) Gani, D. Nature 2001, 414, 703-705.
(11) Wang, S.-S.; Gisin, B. F.; Winter, D. P.; Makofske, R.; Kulesha,
I. D.; Tzougraki, C.; Meienhofer, J. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 1286-1290.
(14) The mechanism of the Mitsunobu reaction is still controversial.
Over the years, a proposal involving formation of the “consensus”
alkoxyphosphonium intermediate (C) by alcoholate displacement of an
acyloxyphoshponium ion (B) rather than by direct reaction of an alcohol
with the protonated Mitsunobu betaine (A) has gained support (Hughes, D.
L.; Reamer, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2967-2971). This mechanism
is capable of rationalizing the retention of configuration observed in the
Mitsunobu lactonization of hindered secondary hydroxy acids, where
alcoholate attack at the carbonyl rather than the phosphor atom of
intermediate B apparently takes place (Ahn, C.; Correia, R.; DeShong, P.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1751-1753). However, the chemoselectivity
observed in the Mitsunobu esterification of phenolic alcohols is better
explained by a mechanism that does not involve deprotonated alcohols,
since phenol etherification should compete with alkyl ester formation if
3840
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 22, 2002