A R T I C L E S
Chen et al.
decreasing for generation 4 (∼93%).8 Mu¨llen, De Schryver, and
their co-workers developed a system in which the donor (D)
and the acceptor (A) were separated by rigid polyphenylene
dendrimers and found that intramolecular directional Fo¨rster
resonance energy transfer took place very efficiently.9
play an antenna role in the energy transfer. The dendrimers are
synthesized up to the fourth generation, as shown in Figure 1.
In these molecules, the BP chromophore can be selectively
excited. After intersystem crossing with 100% efficiency, the
triplet energy of BP is transferred to NBD, resulting in the
isomerization of the latter to the quadricyclane (QC) group. The
efficiency and the absolute rate constant of intramolecular triplet
energy transfer were examined by steady-state and time-resolved
spectroscopy. The rate constant decreases inconspicuously as
the generation increases. These findings provide a new example
of the use of the dendrimer for light harvesting; the periphery
“antenna” chromophores “harvest” photon energy which is then
utilized to activate the core group via the Dexter energy transfer
mechanism.
Up to now, most of the studies and other experiments10 on
intramolecular energy transfer between the periphery chro-
mophores and the core in dendrimers are related to the singlet
states only, and the energy transfer proceeds via Fo¨rster
mechanism. The Fo¨rster mechanism is a through-space dipole-
dipole interaction, and the D-A orbital overlap is not necessary.
This allows the chromophores to be separated by a relatively
large distance (10-100 Å). Within dendritic structures, the
distance between D and A is less than several tens of angstroms,
even D and A are located at the periphery and the core,
respectively, in high generations. It is expected that the energy
transfer via the Fo¨rster mechanism can occur efficiently from
the periphery to the core in the dendritic structure, and the
experimental results confirm this hypothesis.8,9 However, den-
drimers capable of light harvesting through the triplet-triplet
energy transfer mechanism have rarely been demonstrated. As
we know, the triplet-triplet energy transfer is the most common
and most important type of energy transfer involved in chemical
and biochemical processes.11 The mechanism for triplet energy
transfer is usually described by Dexter electron-exchange
interaction12 and may be visualized in terms of two electron
transfer processes or one electron transfer and one hole transfer
processes.11 Generally, this electron exchange requires strong
D-A orbital overlap, and therefore the energy transfer rate
constant in this case decreases exponentially with increasing
D-A distance. Thus, one might expect that the rate constant
of triplet energy transfer will become negligibly small as the
D-A distance increases beyond 10 Å,11 except the energy
transfer occurs via a “through-bond mechanism” in a conjugated
or rigid system. Furthermore, most of the studies of intramo-
lecular energy transfer of dendrimer concern photophysical
processes. There are only a few examples of application of
intramolecular energy transfer dealing with photochemical
process.7
Experimental Section
Materials. Reagents were purchased from Aldrich or Acros and were
used without further purification, unless otherwise noted. Tetrahydro-
furan (THF) was distilled over Na/benzophenone under an argon
atmosphere. Acetone was dried with anhydrous K2CO3 and distilled.
Spectral-grade 2-methyltetrahydrofuran and dichloromethane (CH2Cl2)
were used for absorption and emission spectra, flash photolysis, and
steady-state photoirradiation measurements.
Instrumentation. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on either a Varian
Gemini 300 MHz or a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer. IR spectra were
run on a Bio-Rad Win IR spectrometer. MALDI-TOF mass spectrom-
etry was performed on a Bruker BIFLEX spectrometer. Elemental
analyses were carried out on a Flash EA1112 spectrometer. Melting
points were determined on a XT4A apparatus and were uncorrected.
HPLC was recorded at a Hitachi system with an Alltima LC-Si 5 µm
column (4.6 mm ID, 25 cm) and a UV-vis detector. Steady-state
absorption spectra and phosphorescence spectra were measured by a
Shimadzu UV-1601PC spectrometer and a Hitachi F-4500 spectrometer,
respectively.
Phosphorescence Measurements. Phosphorescence studies were
performed in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran at 77 K, and the sample solutions
were degassed by at least three freeze-pump-thaw cycles at a pressure
of 5 × 10-5 Torr. The excitation wavelength was 343 nm. For
comparison of the emission efficiency of Gn-NBD with Gn-QC, the
spectra were run using solutions with identical optical density at the
excitation wavelength. The relative emission efficiencies were measured
from the peak areas of the emission spectra.
In the present work, we create a dendritic system in which
the energy transfer between the peripheral chromophores and
the core is suitable for Dexter triplet state energy transfer, and
a photochemical reaction of the core is used as the probe to
detect the energy transfer occurrence. Benzophenone (BP)
chromophores and norbornadiene (NBD) group are attached to
the periphery and the core of the poly(aryl ether) dendrimer,13
respectively, and the dendritic backbone acts as a scaffold that
holds D and A in a desired spatial arrangement and does not
Redox Potentials of BP and MNBD. The redox potentials of BP
and MNBD were determined by cyclic voltammetry in dichloromethane,
using a 10 µm platinum microelectrode and a Ag/Ag+ (the concentration
of Ag+ is 0.01 M) reference electrode in the presence of 0.1 M
tetrabutylammonium perchlorate as the supporting electrolyte.
Laser Flash Photolysis. Nanosecond transient absorption spectra
were performed on a LP-920 pump-probe spectroscopic setup (Ed-
inburgh). The excited source was the unfocused third harmonic (355
nm, 7 ns fwhm) output of a Nd:YAG laser (Continuum surelite II);
the probe light source was a pulse-xenon lamp. The signals were
detected by Edinburgh analytical instruments (LP900) and recorded
on a Tektronix TDS 3012B oscilloscope and computer.
(8) (a) Adronov, A.; Gilat, S. L.; Fre´chet, J. M. J.; Ohta, K.; Neuwahl, F. V.
R.; Fleming, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1175. (b) Adronov, A.;
Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1701.
(9) (a) Gronheid, R.; Hofkens, J.; Ko¨hn, F.; Weil, T.; Reuther, E.; Mu¨llen, K.;
De Schryver, F. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2418. (b) Cotlet, M.;
Gronheid, R.; Habuchi, S.; Stefan, A.; Barbafina, A.; Mu¨llen, K.; Hofkens,
J.; De Schryver, F. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13609.
Results and Discussion
(10) (a) Stewart, G. M.; Fox, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4354. (b)
Aida, T.; Jiang, D.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10895. (c) Gilat, S.
L.; Adronov, A.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1422.
(d) Hahn, U.; Gorka, M.; Vogtle, F.; Vicinelli, V.; Ceroni, P.; Maestri, M.;
Balazani, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3595.
Synthesis and Stability of the Dendrimers. The synthesis
and characterization of the compounds are described in Sup-
porting Information. All of the compounds have been purified
by column chromatography. The target compounds, Gn-NBD
(n ) 1-4), were characterized by 1H NMR, elemental analysis,
IR, mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF or EI), and HPLC (see
(11) Turro, N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; Benjamin/Cumming:
Menlo Park, CA, 1978; Chapter 9.
(12) (a) Dexter, D. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 836. (b) Katz, J. L.; Jortner, J.;
Chol, S. I.; Rice, S. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 1897.
(13) (a) Hawker, C. J.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7638. (b)
Hawker, C. J.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 1010.
9
2166 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 7, 2005