10.1002/anie.201706150
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
[3]
For initial work on D-A cyclopropanes, see: a) H.-U. Reissig, E. Hirsch,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19, 813-814. b) H.-U. Reissig, E.
Hirsch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19, 813-814. c) H.-U. Reissig,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 2981-2984. d) E. L. Grimm, H.-U. Reissig, J.
Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 242-244. e) C. Brückner, H.-U. Reissig, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 588-589. f) C. Brückner, H.-U. Reissig, J.
Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2440-2450. g) E. Wenkert, Acc. Chem. Res. 1980,
13, 27-31. For a recent review see: h) T. F. Schneider, J. Kaschel, D. B.
Werz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5504-5523.
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanistic pathway.
To further expand the synthetic value of the presented meth-
odology, chemoselective transformations of the cycloadducts
have been performed. It was found that a Cu(II) catalyzed stere-
oselective monohydrolysis of one of the two geminal cyano-sub-
stituents was possible (Scheme 4). This allows for the formation
of amide 5 with an additional quaternary stereocenter formed in
86% yield as a single diastereomer. The relative configuration of
the newly formed stereocenter was determined by X-ray analysis
(see Supporting Information). Furthermore, we achieved a
chemoselective reduction of the nitro group with Cl3SiH/DIPEA as
reducing agent, followed by an intramolecular condensation af-
fording the bicyclic imine 6 in 75% yield.
[4]
For organocatalytic example of electrophillic activation of 1,3-dipole, see:
(a) L- Li, Z. Li, Q. Wang, Synlett. 2009, 11, 1830-1834. For example of
photocatalytic intramolecular ring expansion, see b) J. L.-Barrera, V. L.-
Martín, T. Rigotti, F. Peccati, X. S.-Monfort, M. Sodupe, R. M.-Ballesté,
M. Liras, J. Alemán, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7826-7830.
G. Dickmeiss, V. D. Sio, J. Udmark, T. B. Poulsen, V. Marcos, K. A.
Jørgensen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6650-6653.
K. S. Halskov, F. Kniep, V. H. Lauridsen, E. H. Iversen, B. S. Donslund,
K. A. Jørgensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1685-1691.
E. S.-Díez, D. L. Vesga, E. Reyes, U. Uria, L. Carrillo, J. L. Vicario, Org.
Lett. 2016, 18, 1270-1273.
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
L. Prieto, E. S.-Díez, U. Uria, E. Reyes, L. Carrillo, J. L. Vicario, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1678-1683.
C. Sparr, R. Gilmour, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8391-8395.
[10] For examples of enantioselective Lewis acid catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddi-
tions, see a) A. T. Parsons, J. S. Johnson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
3122-3123. b) H. Xu, J.-P. Qu, S. Liao, H. Xiong, Y. Tang, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4004-4007. c) H. Xiong, H. Xu, S. Liao, Z. Xie, Y. Tang,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7851-7854. d) F. D. Nanteuil, E. Serrano,
D. Perrotta, J. Waser, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6239-6242. e) D.-
C. Wang, M.-S. Xie, H.-M. Guo, G.-R. Qu, M.-C. Zhang, S.-L. You, An-
gew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14111-14115.
Scheme 4. Chemoselective transformations of the cycloadducts.
[11] Similar limitations was observed with a formyl substituted bis-ester cy-
clopropane: H. Xie, L. Zu, H. Li, J. Wang, W. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 10886-10894.
In conclusion, we have presented a new organocatalytic nu-
cleophilic activation mode for D-A cyclopropanes resulting in an
unprecedented [3+2] cycloaddition which proceeds in high yield
and stereoselectivity. An optically active Brønsted base catalyst
promoted the desired 1,3-dipolar reactivity of a series of cyclo-
propylketones with nitroolefins to give substituted cyclopentanes
with three contiguous stereocenters in enantioselectivities up to
91% ee. It has been demonstrated that the enantiomeric excess
can be increased by recrystallization to >99% ee. In addition, we
have also presented a proposal for a mechanistic pathway that
explains the observed stereoselectivity. Finally, we have shown
that the optically active cyclopentanes can undergo chemoselec-
tive transformations, e.g. a stereoselective reduction of a cyano
group to form the corresponding amide and reduction of the nitro
group to generate a bicyclic imine.
[12] The chemical shift of the bis-ester cyclopropylketone is expected to be
similar to that of the bis-ester cyclopropylacetaldehyde.[6]
[13] a) F. G. Bordwell, D. L. Hughes, J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2206-2215. b)
E. M. Arnett, S. G. Maroldo, S. L. Schilling, J. A. Harrelson, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1984, 106, 6759-6767.
[14] a) B. M. Trost, P. J. Morris, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 50, 6167-6170.
b) A. F. G. Goldberg, B. M. Stoltz, Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4474-4476. c) B.
M. Trost, P. J. Morris, S. J. Sprague, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
17823-17831. d) L.-Y. Mei, Y. Wei, Q. Xu, M. Shi, Organometallics, 2012,
31, 7591-7599.
[15] T. Okino, Y. Hoashi, Y. Takemoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12672-
12673.
[16] a) S. H. Oh, H. S. Rho, J. W. Lee, J. E. Lee, S. H. Youk, J. Chin, C. E.
Song, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7872-7875. b) H. B. Jang, H. S.
Rho, J. S. Oh, E. H. Nam, S. E. Park, H. Y. Bae, C. E. Song, Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2010, 8, 3918-3922. c) Z. I. Günler, I. Alfonso, C. Jimeno, Syn-
thesis 2017, 49, 319-325.
[17] a) A. Hamza, G. Schubert, T. Soós, I. Pápai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 13151-13160. b) E. Badiola, B. Fiser, E. G.-Bengoa, A. Mielgo, I.
Olaizola, I. Urruzuno, J. M. García, J. M. Odriozola, J. Razkin, M. Oiar-
bide, C. Palomo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17869-17881. c) J. Guo,
M. W. Wong, J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 4362-4368.
Acknowledgements
Dr. Kim. S. Halskov is acknowledged for his guidiance in the initial
part of this project. Line D. Næsborg and Dr. Jeremy Erickson are
thanked for peforming the X-ray analysis. Thanks are expressed
to the Carlsberg Semper Ardens and Aarhus University for finan-
cial support.
Keywords: Asymmetric organocatalysis • Brønsted base cataly-
sis • donor-acceptor cyclopropanes • enantioselective [3+2] cy-
cloaddition reaction • enantiodiscriminating 1,3-dipoles.
[1]
For general review regarding the bonding properties and their chemical
consequences, see: a) A. De Meijere, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1979, 18,
809-826. For overview of reactions with unactivated cyclopropanes see:
b) R. Verhé, N. De Kimpe in The Chemistry of The Cyclopropyl Group,
Vol. 1 (Ed.: Z. Rappoport), John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 445-564.
For initial work on electrophilic cyclopropanes, see: a) S. Danishefsky, G.
Rovnyak, J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 114-115. b) W. F. Berkowitz, S. C.
Grenetz, J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 10-12. c) S. Danishefsky, Acc. Chem.
Res. 1979, 12, 66-72. For recent review on electrophilic cyclopropanes,
see: d) F. D. Simone, J. Waser, Synthesis, 2009, 20, 3353-3374. For
review on D-A substituted cyclopropanes see: e) H.-U. Reissig, R. Zim-
mer, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1151-1196. For recent review on asymmet-
ric ring-opening reactions of D-A cyclopropanes, see: f) L. Wang, Y. Tang,
Isr. J. Chem. 2016, 56, 463-475.
[2]
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.