Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
ation the excited state of an IrIII chromophore would first
oxidize the electron-rich p-methoxyphenyl (PMP) group of
substrate 1, generating aryl radical cation intermediate I.
Next, an intramolecular PCET event would occur between
the alcohol adjacent to the radical cation I and an exogenous
Brønsted base to furnish key alkoxy radical intermediate
With these optimized conditions in hand, we examined the
generality of this 1,3-transposition protocol (Table 2) and
found that a variety of allylic alcohol substrates were
accommodated. Substrates bearing secondary and tertiary
aliphatic migratory groups (1–11) generally afforded the
desired ketone products in good to excellent yields, though
for 5 optimal results required the use of 2-methyl-2-oxazoline
as the optimal base co-catalyst. Analogous substrates bearing
primary aliphatic migratory groups proved to be inefficient,
likely due to less favorable b-scission. Unsaturated b-amino
alcohol derivatives (12–16) were also readily isomerized to
furnish g-amino aldehyde products (12a-16a), albeit requir-
ing increased loading of the photocatalyst for optimal
performance.[12] Notably, for this class of substrates, the
PMP group was not required for PCET activation, though
optimal results required the use of diphenyl phosphate as
a base in place of collidine. These reactions proceed through
an alternative PCET mechanism which we have reported
previously for non-benzylic alcohols involving a hydrogen-
bonded complex between the alcohol and the phosphate
base.[7b,c] In this class of substrates, the formation of a stabi-
II.[7a,11] Radical II would then undergo C C b-scission, leading
À
to the concurrent formation of alkyl radical intermediate III
and an a,b-unsaturated ketone. Intermolecular recombina-
tion of these scission products would then occur via radical
À
conjugate addition to deliver a new C C bond and electro-
philic a-acyl radical IV. IV would accept an electron from the
reduced IrII state of the photocatalyst and the resulting
enolate would then be protonated by the conjugate acid of the
Brønsted base to close the catalytic cycle and furnish the
desired ketone product 1a (Figure 2).
Our experimental investigations began with conditions
À
adapted from our previous reports on O H b-scission,
employing allylic alcohol 1 as the model substrate.[7c] Upon
treating 1 with 2 mol% [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(5,5’-d(CF3)(bpy))]-
(PF6) and 25 mol% PBu4+CF3CO2À in PhCF3 under blue-light
irradiation for 24 hours, the desired ketone product 1a was
formed in 46% yield as judged by 1H NMR analysis (Table 1,
entry 1). Further optimization revealed that neutral 2,4,6-
collidine (entry 5) was a superior Brønsted base (entries 1–4),
and that increasing the loading of the base from 25 mol% to
300 mol% (entries 5–7) further benefitted the reaction yield.
A survey of reaction solvents (entries 7–9) affirmed PhCF3 as
the optimal reaction medium, but reactions in toluene and
dichloromethane also provided serviceable yields. Finally,
control experiments revealed that the Ir photocatalyst and
visible-light irradiation are essential for the observed reac-
tivity (entries 10, 11), while the absence of the Brønsted base
afforded a complex mixture of products and low yields of the
desired ketone product 1a (entry 12).
À
lized a-aminoalkyl radical intermediate enables the C C b-
scission step to compete effectively with non-productive back-
electron transfer.
In addition to alkyl radicals, acyl radicals also proved to be
viable migratory groups, as demonstrated by the isomer-
ization of a-hydroxy ketone 17 into 1,4-diketone 17a.
Cascade cyclization reactions can also be accomplished as
demonstrated by the reaction of norbornene derivative 18. In
this substrate, the alkyl radical intermediate formed in the b-
scission event first undergoes intramolecular addition of
À
a pendant alkene to form a new C C bond, and the resulting
alkyl radical is then captured by the ejected enone acceptor to
afford the polycyclic product 18a as a single diastereomer in
78% yield.
Further investigation revealed that derivatives of (À)-
menthol (19), metoprolol (20), D-ribose (21), gemfibrozil
(22), pregnenolone (23), and harmandianone (24) all fur-
nished the desired 1,3-transposed ketone products (19a-24a)
in synthetically useful yields, demonstrating that the method
tolerates a variety of functional groups including electron-rich
arenes (20, 22), distal olefins (23), acetals (21), and esters (24).
Notably, for 20 and 22, a combination of 3% photocatalyst
loading, acetonitrile solvent, and 2-methyl-2-oxazoline as the
base co-catalyst provided optimal results. 21a and 23a were
afforded as single diastereomers while 20a was the sole
product observed despite two potential sites for b-scission in
substrate 20—an outcome in line with the known preference
for b-scission reactions to favor the ejection of the most stable
radical intermediate.[9]
We then considered whether methylidenecycloalkanols
might be prompted to undergo allylic ring reconstruction
under these PCET conditions. As such, we were pleased to
find that a variety of methylidenecycloalkanol substrates (25–
27) rearranged readily, yielding transposed ketone (25a) or
aldehyde products (26a, 27a) in excellent yields, albeit with
a slightly higher loading of photocatalyst (3 mol%). Reac-
tions of 26 and 27 are thought to proceed through the
hydrogen-bond-mediated PCET mechanism discussed for 12–
Table 1: Optimization Studies.[a]
Entry
Brønsted Base [mol%]
Solvent
Yield[c]
+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PBu4 CF3CO2À (25)
PhCF3
PhCF3
PhCF3
PhCF3
PhCF3
PhCF3
PhCF3
PhCH3
CH2Cl2
46%
68%
24%
32%
75%
85%
95%
84%
79%
PBu4 (PhO)2P(O)OÀ (25)
+
PBu4 (MeO)2P(O)OÀ (25)
+
PBu4 (n-BuO)2P(O)OÀ (25)
+
2,4,6-collidine (25)
2,4,6-collidine (100)
2,4,6-collidine (300)
2,4,6-collidine (300)
2,4,6-collidine (300)
Changes from the optimal conditions (entry 7)
no light
10
11
12
0%
0%
14%
no IrIII photocatalyst
no Brønsted base
[a] Optimization reactions were performed on 0.05 mmol scale.
[b] Internal temperature of the reaction mixture under LED irradiation
(see SI for details). [c] Yields were determined by H NMR analysis of
crude reaction mixtures relative to dimethylformamide as the internal
standard.
1
2
ꢀ 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1 – 7
These are not the final page numbers!