it gives the methoxytwistanone 5 via an intramolecular aldol
process as shown in A, which is presumably accelerated due
to a vicinal gem-dimethyl effect.5 We report here the novel
stepwise acid-promoted double Michael reaction6 of very
hindered 2-silyloxydienes with hindered ketone dienophiles
in the presence of the very strong Brønsted acid triflimide
(Tf2NH) to ultimately afford the products of a difficult [4+2]
cycloaddition.
In our previous work, we used a 5:1 mixture of AlBr3:
AlMe3 as a strong Lewis acid system in which we could
guarantee the lack of even traces of HBr since it was thought
that the presence of adventitious amounts of HBr would be
detrimental to the desired Diels-Alder cycloaddition, in
particular by causing decomposition of the electron-rich
diene.7 However, in an attempt to accelerate some hindered
cycloadditions, we decided to carry out the reaction in the
presence of triflimide, a very strong Brønsted acid.8 Thus
treatment of the 2-silyloxydiene 1 with 3-methylcyclohex-
enone 6 in the presence of 1-5% triflimide in dichlo-
romethane at -78 °C for 2 h afforded, after quenching at
-78 °C, the Mukaiyama Michael9 product 7 in 92% yield
(Scheme 2). Treatment of this new silyloxyenone 7 with
Diels-Alder [4+2] cycloaddition, which can be carried out
by using our mixed Lewis acid catalyst. If one lets the
reaction of 1 and 6 in the presence of triflimide warm to 0
°C before quenching, then the ketone 8 is produced in 89%
isolated yield. Hydrolysis of the silyl enol ether of 8 gives
the cis dione 9, which can be equilibrated to a 15:85 mixture
of 9 and 10, favoring the more stable trans dione. Thus we
have shown that the apparent cycloaddition of 1 and 6 in
the presence of triflimide proceeds via the Mukaiyama
Michael adduct 7.
We believe that the true catalyst in this process is tert-
butyldimethylsilyl triflimide, TBSNTf2 11. The silyl triflim-
ide 11 was prepared by the method of Ghosez, namely by
addition of triflimide to the corresponding allylsilane.11
Addition of this silyl triflimide 11 to a solution of 1 and 6
in dichloromethane does afford both the simple Michael
adduct 7 and the double Michael product 8, depending on
time and conditions.
When the enone dienophile is unhindered (no â-alkyl
group), the initial Michael reaction also works very well.
Thus addition of 1 to 2-methylcyclohexenone 12 with either
Tf2NH or the mixed Lewis acid with quenching at -78 °C
gave the Mukaiyama Michael product 13 in 95% yield
(Scheme 3). However, hindrance at the R-carbon of the enone
Scheme 2
Scheme 3
now slows the intramolecular Michael so that triflimide no
longer is reactive enough to promote the second Michael
process. However, the use of AlMe3 converted 13, in 89%
yield, into the [4+2] cycloadduct 14, which on hydrolysis
affords the dione 15. The mixed Lewis acid system afforded
in 60% yield the double bond isomer 16, which is calculated
to be somewhat more stable than 14.
triflimide or silyl triflate (TBSOTf) gives the second,
intramolecular Michael product, namely the ketone 8, in
51-63% yield.10 This would be the product of the direct
We have found that the triflimide-catalyzed processes can
be much cleaner than the cycloadditions using the mixed
aluminum Lewis acid that we reported earlier. Thus reaction
of the diene 1 with 1-acetyl-2-methylcyclopentene 17 in the
presence of Tf2NH was much cleaner giving the desired
adduct 18 with much less of the diene-dimerization product
19 (Scheme 4). Again if one quenches the initial Tf2NH
(5) Jung, M. E.; Piizzi, G. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1735-1766.
(6) For a review of base-catalyzed double Michael additions leading to
bicyclic products, see: Jung, M. E. Stabilized Nucleophiles with Electron
Deficient Alkenes and Alkynes. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost,
B. M., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1991; Vol. 4, Chapter 1.1, pp
1-67.
(7) a) Jung, M. E.; Davidov, P. Angew. Chem. 2002, 41, 4125-28.
(8) The pKa of triflimide is estimated to be -16 while that of triflic acid
has been calculated to be -14. Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21,
456-463.
(9) (a) Narasaka, N.; Soai, K.; Aikawa, Y.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1976, 49, 779-83. (b) For a review, see: Lee, V. Conjugate
Additions of Carbon Ligands to Activated Alkenes and Alkynes. In
ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon Press:
Oxford, UK, 1991; Vol. 4, Chapter 1.3, pp 139-168.
(10) For an example of a triflimide-promoted Michael addition (and
closure to the [2+2] product), see: Takasu, K.; Ishii, T.; Inanaga, K.; Ihara,
M. Org. Synth. 2006, 83, 193.
(11) Mathieu, B.; Ghosez, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5497-
5500.
376
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 2, 2007