Angewandte
Chemie
secutive 5’-amino-DNA monomers, displayed a drastically
decreased binding affinity with its DNA and RNA comple-
ments. On the other hand, the 5’-amino-3’,5’-BNA ODNs 11–
13 achieved stable duplex formation with complementary
strands. An increase in the Tm values by 1–38C and 4–108C
was observed when the ODNs 11–13 formed duplexes with
complementary DNA and RNA, respectively. It is note-
worthy that the difference between the Tm values of 13/RNA
and 16/RNA hybrids was over 308C. Thus, the 5’-amino-3’,5’-
BNAs have strong duplex-forming ability. This result indi-
cates that the methylene bridge between the C3’ and N5’
atoms successfully restricts the conformation around the g
dihedral angle in an appropriate form for duplex formation.
Next, we investigated the effect of the methylene bridge
on acid-mediated hydrolysis of the P3’!N5’-phosphorami-
date linkage. The 5’-amino-3’,5’-BNA ODN 11 was treated
with buffer (pH 3.0 or pH 7.0) to be hydrolyzed, and the
amount of intact 11 was determined by reversed-phase HPLC
analysis (Figure 3). Under pH 3.0 conditions, 50% of 11 was
Keywords: conformation analysis · nucleic acids · nucleosides ·
oligonucleotides · phosphoramidates
.
[1] N. Venkatesan, S. J. Kim, B. H. Kim, Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10,
1973 – 1991.
[2] J. Kurreck, Eur. J. Biochem. 2003, 270, 1628 – 1644.
[3] S. M. Gryaznov, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1489, 131 – 140.
[4] W. Bannwarth, Helv. Chim. Acta 1988, 71, 1517 – 1527.
[5] M. S. Shchepinov, M. F. Denissenko, K. J. Smylie, R. J. Wꢀrl,
A. L. Leppin, C. R. Cantor, C. P. Rodi, Nucleic Acids Res. 2001,
29, 3864 – 3872.
[6] J. L. Wolfe, B. H. Wang, T. Kawate, V. P. Stanton, Jr., J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10500 – 10501.
[7] S. M. Gryaznov, R. L. Letsinger, Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20,
3403 – 3409.
[8] E. Viazovkina, K.-L. Min, A. Galarneau, M. J. Damha, Nucleo-
sides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2003, 22, 1335 – 1338.
[9] E. M. Nottoli, J. B. Lambert, R. L. Letsinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 3486 – 3491.
[10] T. Imanishi, S. Obika, Chem. Commun. 2002, 1653 – 1659.
[11] a) S. Obika, D. Nanbu, Y. Hari, K. Morio, Y. In, T. Ishida, T.
Imanishi, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8735 – 8738; b) S. Obika, K.
Morio, D. Nanbu, T. Imanishi, Chem. Commun. 1998, 1643 –
1644; c) S. Obika, J. Andoh, T. Sugimoto, K. Miyashita, T.
Imanishi, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6465 – 6468; d) S. Obika, J.
Andoh, M. Onoda, O. Nakagawa, A. Hiroto, T. Sugimoto, T.
Imanishi, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5267 – 5270.
[12] S. Obika, O. Nakagawa, A. Hiroto, Y. Hari, T. Imanishi, Chem.
Commun. 2003, 2202 – 2203.
[13] M. Tarkꢀy, M. Bolli, B. Schweizer, C. Leumann, Helv. Chim.
Acta 1993, 76, 481 – 510.
[14] R. Steffens, C. Leumann, Helv. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 2426 – 2439.
[15] a) D. Renneberg, E. Bouliong, U. Reber, D. Schꢁmperli, C. J.
Leumann, Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 2751 – 2757; b) D. Ittig, S.
Liu, D. Renneberg, D. Schꢁmperli, C. J. Leumann, Nucleic Acids
Res. 2004, 32, 346 – 353.
[16] M. Sharma, M. Bobek, Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 5839 – 5842.
[17] CCDC-247780 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from
m.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Figure 3. Hydrolytic cleavage of the P3’!N5’-phosphoramidate bond
~
&
in modified ODNs: : 5’-amino-3’,5’-BNA ODN 11 at pH 3.0; : 5’-
amino-3’,5’-BNA ODN 11 at pH 7.0; &: 5’-amino-DNA ODN 14 at
pH 3.0. The reaction was carried out at 308C with 1 nmol of ODN in
buffer (100 mL). The sequence of oligonucleotides 11 and 14 is shown
in Figure 2.
[18] The composition of the oligonucleotides 11–13 was confirmed by
MALDI-TOF MS in negative-ion mode. A molecular-ion peak
[MꢁH]ꢁ was detected in all cases, except for oligonucleotide 12.
See the Supporting Information.
[19] C. Vargeese, J. Carter, J. Yegge, S. Krivjansky, A. Settle, E.
Kropp, K. Peterson, W. Pieken, Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26,
1046 – 1050.
[20] C. Scheuer-Larsen, B. M. Dahl, J. Wengel, O. Dahl, Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 8361 – 8364.
[21] Y. Hayakawa, M. Uchiyama, R. Noyori, Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
27, 4191 – 4194.
hydrolyzed at the P3’!N5’-phosphoramidate linkage within
30 min and 95% was cleaved at 120 min, while no hydrolysis
was observed at pH 7.0. The 5’-amino-DNA 16 was also
cleaved at pH 3.0; however, hydrolysis is much slower than
for 5’-amino-3’,5’-BNA. Thus, the additional methylene
bridge between N5’ and C3’ atoms accelerates the hydrolysis
of phosphoramidate linkage probably due to its electron-
donating property.
We have synthesized a novel 5’-amino-DNA analogue, 5’-
amino-3’,5’-BNA, with a g dihedral angle that is well adjusted
by the methylene bridge between the C3’ and N5’ atoms. We
have also found that the methylene bridge effectively elicits
not only a strong hybridizing ability but also the rapid
hydrolysis of the P3’!N5’-phosphoramidate linkage of 5’-
amino-3’,5’-BNA. This feature of 5’-amino-3’,5’-BNA would
be applicable to a variety of genome technologies, such as a
novel sequence determination or single-nucleotide-poly-
morphism analysis.
[22] Synthesis of 5’-amino-DNA oligonucleotides 14–16 was per-
formed according to ref. [4].
[23] The Tm profiles of duplexes containing the oligonucleotides 11–
13 can be found in the Supporting Information.
Received: September 10, 2004
Published online: January 28, 2005
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1944 –1947
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1947