C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Enantioselective Hydrogenation of Aromatic Ketones
4a-h under the Catalysis of 3a,ba
Table 2. Recycling and Reuse of the Self-Supported Catalyst 3b
in Enantioselective Hydrogenation of 3ca
run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
conv (%) >99
ee (%) 97.4
>99
97.6
>99
97.3
>99
96.5
>99
95.6
>99
97
96.1 95.4
a All of the reactions were carried out under the experimental conditions
of entry 2 in Table 1.
entry
catalyst
Ar in 4
ee (%) of 5b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
3a
3b
c
d
e
3b
3b
3b
3b
3b
3b
3b
3bf
Ph (a)
Ph (a)
Ph (a)
Ph (a)
78.2 (R)
97.4 (R)
95.5 (R)
96.4 (R)
30.5 (R)
98.1 (R)
94.5 (R)
96.2 (R)
96.9 (R)
97.2 (R)
97.5 (R)
96.2 (R)
95.2 (R)
catalyst 3b were then examined in the hydrogenation of 4a. After
the completion of the hydrogenation, the separation of the catalyst
and product (Ru leaching in product <0.1 ppm) could be achieved
by simple filtration under Ar atmosphere. The separated solid
catalyst was recharged with solvent, base, and substrate again for
the next run of hydrogenation. As shown in Table 2, the self-
supported catalyst could be reused for seven cycles of hydrogenation
without obvious loss of enantioselectivities and catalytic activities.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a new approach for
generation of self-supported chiral catalysts by programmed as-
sembly of two different multitopic ligands with metallic ions. The
self-supported heterogeneous Noyori-type catalysts are comparable
to those of their homogeneous counterpart in terms of both activity
and enantioselectivity, although several excellent organic polymer-
supported Ru(II) catalysts have been reported.5 This type of catalyst
can be readily recovered and reused with the retention of high
enantioselectivity and activity. Further studies on the simplification
of the synthetic procedures of multitopic ligands and the impact of
a spacer in the multitopic ligands on both the structure of assemblies
and their catalytic performance are underway in this laboratory.
Ph (a)
1-naphthyl (b)
2-naphthyl (c)
4′-F-Ph (d)
4′-Cl-Ph (e)
4′-Br-Ph (f)
4′-Me-Ph (g)
4′-MeO-Ph (h)
Ph (a)
a All reactions were carried out at 25 °C under 40 atm pressure of H2 at
a substrate concentration of 1.5 M with substrate/catalyst/KOtBu ) 1000:
1:20 for 20 h. The conversions of the substrates were determined by 1H
NMR to be >99%. b Determined by chiral GC. The absolute configuration
of the products was determined by the sign of optical rotation. c Catalyst:
[RuCl2{(S)-3,5-XylBINAP}{(S,S)-1,2-bis-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethylenedi-
amine}]. d Catalyst: [Ru2Cl4{1b}{(S,S)-1,2-bis-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl-
enediamine}2]. e Catalyst: [RuCl2{1b}{(R,R)-2}. f Substrate/catalyst/KOtBu
) 10000:1:20.
Acknowledgment. Financial support from the NSFC, CAS, the
Major Basic Research Development Program of China (Grant No.
G2000077506), and the Ministry of Science and Technology of
Shanghai Municipality is gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
ligand and catalyst preparation, PXD image of catalyst 3b, and chiral
GC analysis of the products. This material is available free of charge
Figure 1. (a) Self-supported chiral Ru(II) catalyst 3b (pale brown solids
at the bottom of the reactor) in 2-propanol. (b) SEM image of the self-
supported Ru catalyst 3b. The scale bar indicates 2 µm.
References
(1) (a) de Vos, D. E.; Vankelecom, I. F. J.; Jacobs, P. A. In Chiral Catalyst
Immobilization and Recycling; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
(b) Song, C. E.; Lee, S. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3495. (c) Fan, Q.; Li,
Y.-M.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3385. (d) Pu, L. Chem.
ReV. 1998, 98, 2405.
(2) For a highlight, see: (a) Dai, L.-X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
5726. For leading references, see: (b) Seo, J. S.; Whang, D.; Lee, H.;
Jun, S. I.; Oh, J.; Jeon, Y. J.; Kim, K. Nature 2000, 404, 982. (c) Takizawa,
S.; Somei, H.; Jayaprakash, D.; Sasai, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 5711. (d) Guo, H.; Wang, W.; Ding, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
2009. (e) Wang, X.; Ding, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10524. (f)
Hu, A.; Ngo, H. L.; Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11490. (g) Hu,
A.; Ngo, H. L.; Lin, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 6000.
(3) Lehn, J.-M.Chem.sEur. J. 2000, 6, 2097-2102.
(4) For a review, see: (a) Okuma, T.; Kitamura, M.; Noyori, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 40. For leading references, see: (b) Ohkuma, T.; Ooka,
H.; Hashiguchi, S.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
2675. (c) Ohkuma, T.; Ooka, H.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 10417. (d) Doucet, H.; Ohkuma, T.; Murata, K.;
Yokozawa, T.; Kozawa, M.; Katayama, E.; England, A. F.; Ikariya, T.;
Noyori, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1703. (e) Ohkuma, T.;
Koizumi, M.; Doucet, H.; Pham, T.; Kozawa, M.; Murata, K.; Katayama,
E.; Yokozawa, T.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
13529.
(5) For immobilized Noyori’s catalysts, see: (a) Ohkuma, T.; Takeno, H.;
Honda, Y.; Noyori, R. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 369. (b) Li, X.; Chen,
W.; Hems, W.; King, F.; Xiao, J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4559. (c) Itsuno, S.;
Tsuji, A.; Takahashi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3825.
demonstrated the synergistic impact of the supramolecular archi-
tecture of the assemblies on their catalytic behaviors. Furthermore,
the catalyst 3b was used to catalyze the hydrogenation of a series
of aromatic ketones, 4b-h, affording the corresponding secondary
alcohols (5b-h) with excellent enantioselectivities (entries 6-12).
Moreover, acetophenone (4a) could also be hydrogenated at a
reduced catalyst loading (0.01 mol % of 3b) to give 1-phenylethanol
with complete conversion and 95.2% ee (entry 13). The TOF under
this circumstance is calculated to be ∼500 h-1, which illustrated
the high activity of the assembled solid catalyst.
The self-supported catalyst 3b has proven to be completely
insoluble in 2-propanol, as shown in Figure 1a. The inductively
coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopic analysis of the supernatant of
the catalyst indicated that no detectable Ru leached into the organic
phase (<0.1 ppm). When the supernatant of catalyst 3b in
2-propanol was used as catalyst, the hydrogenation of acetophenone
(4a) did not occur at all. This experiment unambiguously demon-
strated the heterogeneous nature of the present catalytic system.
On the basis of this finding, the recovery and the reusability of
JA050737U
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 21, 2005 7695