for a potential probe, namely, that the lactonization reaction
occur spontaneously.
Coumarin 5c showed two absorption bands (271 and 328
nm) and fluoresced weakly, but detectably, with the emission
maximum at 550 nm when excited at 330 nm in neutral
aqueous media (see Supporting Information). Since quinone
3c has no absorption bands above 300 nm and no detectable
fluorescence, the 3c/5c pair constitutes a competent optical
switch.
Having satisfied the criteria for facile cyclization and
optical switching, quinone probe 3c was then screened
against various biologically relevant reductants, and a
qualitative reduction profile was generated (Figure 2). The
Figure 3. Reduction of probe 3c monitored by absorbance and
fluorescence. Ubiquinol (UQH2, 3 equiv) was added to 3c in pH
7.4 phosphate buffer at rt, and absorbance spectra were measured
at 0, 1, 5, and 10 min. The absorbance increase at ∼270 nm is due
to formation of ubiquinone (UQ) as well as 5c; the increase at ∼330
nm is due to formation of 5c only. Inset: the same assay monitored
by fluorescent emission at 550 nm.
Figure 2. Reduction profile of 3c. DQH2 ) duroquinol; UQH2 )
ubiquinol; MQH2 ) menaquinol; NADH ) nicotinamide adenine
suggests its potential usefulness for detecting local redox
potential and electron fluxes in quinone/quinol pools such
as those found in membrane-bound electron transport
chains. Typical detection limits were in the range of
30-50 µM reductant according to the UV-vis assay and
5-10 µM according to the fluorescence assay, visualized
with 1 equiv of probe 3c. This could be improved by further
optimization of coumarin 5c’s photophysical properties;
however, the high local concentration of membrane-confined
quinone redox cofactors should render the current detection
limit satisfactory for use in intact cells or membrane
preparations.
Probe 3c was partially decomposed (accompanied by
partial reduction to 5c) by dithiothreitol and completely
decomposed by glutathione (Figure 2). The instability of
certain quinones to thiols highlights a potential limitation
of using the quinone core as a biochemical redox probe,
since thiols are important, and abundant, biological reduc-
tants. However, preliminary study of the reaction between
probe 3c and thiols indicates that the undesired reaction may
be thwarted by rapid localization of the probe into hydro-
phobic membranes where most quinone redox processes take
place.
dinucleotide hydride; RF ) riboflavin; DOP ) dopamine; Fe2+
)
FeCl2; DTT ) dithiothreitol; GSH ) glutathione. [Conditions: pH
7.4, rt, 10 min, 100 µM 3c, 1-10 equiv of reductant.]
relative reduction rate was estimated by measuring the rate
of formation of coumarin 5c by UV-vis absorption in the
presence of reductant (1-10 equiv) at rt in pH 7.4 phosphate
buffer (Figure 3); formation of 5c was corroborated by
simultaneous HPLC analysis. Coumarin 5c was detected in
the presence of all three p-quinols tested (1-3 equiv). The
relative rates of reduction by the p-quinols were proportional
to their reported midpoint potentials11 (duroquinol, E° )
∼
(+)100 mV; ubiquinol, E° ) ∼(+)60 mV; menaquinol,
E° ) ∼(-)100 mV). Since quinol 4c is immediately and
irreversibly converted to coumarin 5c, the redox couple
3c/4c is unable to equilibrate with other quinone/quinol
couples, allowing complete conversion to occur. Despite the
significantly more negative midpoint potential of NADH
(-320 mV),11 it did not reduce 3c even when present in
10-fold excess; it seems that in this case, a significant ki-
netic (i.e., mechanistic) barrier sufficiently blocks an other-
wise thermodynamically favored process. Probe 3c was
not reduced by riboflavin, dopamine, or Fe(II). The notable
selectivity of probe 3c for quinol cofactors over NADH
In summary, a new fluorogenic chemical transformation
triggered by p-quinone reduction has been developed and
incorporated into a probe that responds spontaneously and
irreversibly to reduction at room temperature in aqueous
media. This process has been coupled to the selective
detection of biologically relevant p-quinol cofactors, dem-
onstrating its potential usefulness as a molecular redox probe.
Although preliminary studies have identified some limitations
of this design, we are currently investigating alternative
(10) Leahy, D. E.; Morris, J. J.; Taylor, P. J.; Wait, A. R. Pharmacochem.
Libr. 1991, 16, 75-82.
(11) (a) Garrett, R. H.; Grisham, C. M. Biochemistry, 2nd ed.; Harcourt
College Publishers: Orlando, FL, 1999; Chapter 21, p 677. (b) Loach,
P. A. In Handbook of Biochemistry: Selected Data for Molecular
Biology, 2nd ed.; Sober, H. A., Ed.; CRC Press: Cleveland, 1970; pp J33-
J40.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 12, 2005
2419