Table 1. Evaluation of Ligands and Reaction Conditions
Table 2. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
MgI2
ratio
yielda
(%)
eeb
(%)
entry equiv L*/MgI2
L*
product
MgI2
ratio
temp reaction yieldb eec
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
(S)-4
(S)-5
(R,S)-6a
R,S)-6a
R,S)-6b
(R,S)-6c
ent-3
ent-3
3
3
3
3
56
74
60
43
62
65
16
39
52
40
18
56
entry equiv L*/MgI2 solvent
(°C)
timea
(%)
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.15
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1.1:1 THF
1.25:1 THF
1.5:1 THF
2.0:1 THF
1.5:1 THF
1.5:1 THF
1.5:1 DCM
1.5:1 DCE
1.5:1 benzene
1.5:1 toluene
60
60
60
60
60
60
40
60
60
80
16 h
12 h
12 h
12 h
12 h
24 h
24 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
62
60
64
56
56
51
0d
0d
0e
80
81
86
84
84
79
83
-
a
Isolated yields. b Determined by HPLC on the chiral stationary phase.
-
86
10
46
a
Time needed to get complete conversion of the starting MCP. b Isolated
yields. c Determined by HPLC on the chiral stationary phase. d No reaction.
Decomposition.
e
of magnesium complexes prepared in situ by mixing MgI2
and bis(oxazoline) ligands 4-6 containing two and three
coordination sites.3
selectivity could be significantly increased (Table 2, entries
1-4). Use of CP-Indabox 6c (45 mol %) and MgI2 (30
mol %) was found to be the optimal conditions providing
the ring-expanded product 8 in 64% yield and 86% ee.6 When
the reaction was carried out in the presence of ligand 6c with
twice as much MgI2 (60 mol %), no significant improvement
was observed in terms of reactivity or selectivity (entry 5).
On the other hand, use of only 15 mol % of MgI2 was found
to slow the rate of the reaction, giving the product in only
21% yield after a prolonged reaction time but with compa-
rable selectivity (entry 6).
Our next set of experiments focused on solvent screening.
When the ring expansion was run in dichloromethane at
reflux, good selectivity but low reactivity were observed
(entry 7). Surprisingly, no reaction occurred in dichloroethane
and only decomposition of the starting materials was
observed in benzene (entries 8 and 9). Finally, a fast and
selective reaction was observed in toluene at 80 °C, but
pyrrolidine 8 was isolated in only 46% yield (entry 10).
To further demonstrate the efficiency of the MgI2-bis-
(oxazoline) 6c complex in ring expansion reactions of MCP
1, a series of aromatic N-tosyl aldimines were subjected to
the optimal reaction conditions described above [MgI2 (30
mol %), CP-Indabox 6c (45 mol %), THF, 60 °C]. In all
cases, the reactions proceeded smoothly giving the trans-
methylene pyrrolidine derivatives as the major product in
yields greater than 50% with ee’s up to 86% (Table 3).
Use of (R,S)-CP-Indabox 6c produced methylene pyrro-
lidine 8a with 86% ee (entry 1), whereas (S,R)-6c delivered
the opposite enantiomer of 8a with 84% ee (entry 2).7,8 When
Reactions were first performed using stoichiometric amounts
of bis(oxazoline) ligands (4-6)/MgI2 complexes. In all cases,
ring expansion proceeded smoothly and the trans-pyrrolidine
3 was obtained in good yields (entries 1-3). It is noteworthy
that the analogous reaction in the absence of the ligand gave
a mixture of cis and trans adducts.4 Whereas the use of
ligands 4 and 5 provided low enantioselectivities, ring
expansion with the MgI2-Indabox 6a complex proceeded
with a higher level of asymmetric induction. Interestingly,
when a substoichiometric amount (30 mol %) of the chiral
Lewis acid was used, the ring-expanded product 3 was
formed in 53% yield but with lower ee (40%) (entry 4).
Subsequent optimization experiments demonstrated that use
of DiMe-Indabox 6b resulted in low enantioselectivity
(entry 5), whereas CP-Indabox 6c was effective in affording
3 in 65% yield and with the best ee (entry 6).5
To avoid background reactions arising from noncomplexed
MgI2 that could diminish the ee, the use of an excess of
ligand compared to MgI2 was tested. As anticipated, by
increasing the ratio L*/Mg, both reactivity and enantio-
(2) For reviews on the use of oxazoline-containing ligands in asymmetric
catalysis, see: (a) Ghosh, A. K.; Mathivanan, P.; Cappiello, J. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1-45. (b) McManus, H.; Guiry, P. J. Chem.
ReV. 2004, 104, 4151-4202.
(3) For an early report of the use of a bis(oxazoline)-Mg complex, see:
Corey, E. J.; Ishihara, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6807-6810.
(4) Indeed, MgI2-mediated ring expansion usually affords mixtures of
diastereomers depending on the substitution pattern of the aldimines.
However, when the reaction was performed in the presence of bis(oxazoline)
ligand 6c, only traces of the cis diastereomer were observed.
(5) (a) Davies, I. E.; Gerena, L.; Castonguay, L.; Senanayake, C. H.;
Larsen, R. D.; Verhoeven, T. R.; Reider, P. J. Synth. Commun. 1996, 1753-
1754. (b) Davies, I. E.; Deeth, R. J.; Larsen, R. D.; Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 1233-1236.
(6) Other conditions, such as solvent, temperature, concentration, and
quantity of the chiral complex, were also tested, but these reaction conditions
were found to give the optimal balance of reaction yields and enantio-
selectivity.
592
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 4, 2007