4902
D. Sherman et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 4901–4903
Table 1. Isolated yield of non-symmetrical malonates of type 4 after
three stages
two different units AH and BH using monoprotected
malonic acid derivatives of type 1. Such a procedure
should involve first a carbodiimide-mediated coupling
of substrate AH with a monoprotected malonate of type
1 followed by deprotection of a diester of type 2 and sec-
ond a carbodiimide coupling between the resulting
monoester 3 and substrate BH to afford the desired
non-symmetrical diester of type 4.
Entry Molecule AH
Molecule BH
Isolated
yield, %
a
b
c
Geraniol
Geraniol
tert-BuOH 91
Diacetone-D-glucose 84
Benzhydrol
Geraniol
Geraniol
Adamantol
78
80
74
d
e
(À)-Menthol
4-Hydroxybenzyl
alcohol
Since the removal of a tert-butyl group can be done eas-
ily in the presence of other esters, mono-tert-butyl malo-
nate could be used for implementing this approach6,7
although the conditions of acid-catalyzed deprotection
are too harsh for the majority of polyfunctional sub-
strates. Other protecting groups for malonic acid also
require the use of strongly acidic or basic reagents for
their removal (e.g., methoxybenzyl or 9-fluorenylmethyl
esters) or are difficult to implement in small scale reac-
tions (e.g., catalytic hydrogenation or electrolysis).
f
Adamantol
Mercaptoethanol
Mercaptoethanol
2,3-Isopropylidene
glycerol
68
55
g
h
i
2-Phenyl-2-propanol Diisopropylamine
Octanol 4-aminophenol
56
49 + 26
ones, provided non-symmetrical malonates of type 4 in
good to excellent non-optimized yields.
Silicon-based protecting groups for alcohols have found
extensive use in organic synthesis due to the ease of their
selective removal by fluoride anions.8 In contrast, pro-
tection of a carboxyl group as a silyl ester is much less
common due to their very high reactivity towards nucleo-
philic reagents. However, after the attempted synthesis
of different silyl malonates we found that tert-butyl-
diphenylsilyl malonate can be isolated as a reasonably
stable crystalline solid.9
Reactions with polyfunctional substrates (entries e–g)
demonstrate the chemoselectivity of the method. In all
these entries the acylation selectively proceeded on the
aliphatic hydroxy group and no appreciable amounts
of acylation of thiol or phenol functionalities were
detected. It should be mentioned that these chemoselecti-
vities are completely opposite to conventional carbodi-
imide esterifications.12 Formation of the malonamide
linkage by the current procedure was somewhat slow
and only moderate yields were achieved (entry h). Reac-
tion with 4-aminophenol was the only case where low
chemoselectivity was observed thus providing mainly
products of N-acylation (49%) with a substantial
amount of the O-acylation product (26%).
Like other malonate monoesters, a carbodiimide-medi-
ated coupling of tert-butyldiphenylsilyl malonate with
alcohols and amines proceeded in practically quantita-
tive yields under very mild conditions. The subsequent
removal of the tert-butyldiphenylsilyl ester protecting
group from 2 can be done easily with commercially
available tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride. However,
all commercially available sources of Bu4NF contain
at least 3 equiv of water and attempts to produce dry
Bu4NF result in a highly basic reagent that is prone to
decomposition.10 After searching for alternative fluoride
anion sources, we found that equimolar amounts of
commercially available anhydrous and neutral triethyl-
amine–hydrogen fluoride complex Et3NÆ3HF easily
deprotects silyl malonates of type 2 thus providing mal-
onate monoesters of type 3.
In conclusion, one-pot permanent tethering through
unsymmetric malonate derivatives provide a number
of important advantages versus existing methods includ-
ing the possibility to conjugate sterically hindered hy-
droxy and amino groups, short reaction times,
equimolecular amounts of tethering reagents and the ab-
sence of laborious intermediate purification stages.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Israel Science Foun-
dation (Grant No. 176/02-1).
We found that residual triethylamine–hydrogen fluoride
does not interfere with the subsequent carbodiimide
coupling. This fact made it possible to conduct the sec-
ond carbodiimide-mediated coupling of malonate
monoesters of type 3 with BH in one pot without any
intermediate purification. The final purification of the
resultant non-symmetric malonates of type 4 was
achieved by flash chromatography. No appreciable
amounts of symmetrical malonate diesters such as (AO-
CO)2CH2 or (BOCO)2CH2 were detected in the reaction.
The simplicity of the method is demonstrated by the rep-
resentative procedure that could also be suitable for the
preparation of combinatorial libraries.11
References and notes
1. For a general review of heterobifunctional bioconjugation
methods, see: Bioconjugate Techniques; Hermanson, G. T.,
Ed.; Academic: San Diego, 1996, pp 229–287.
2. For the most recent review on bioconjugation, see: Kluger,
R.; Alagic, A. Bioorg. Chem. 2004, 32, 451–472.
3. (a) For example, see: Macias, F. A.; Aguilar, J. M.;
Molinillo, J. M. G.; Massanet, G. M.; Fronczek, F. R.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 5439–5450; (b) Kim, M. H.; Patel,
D. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5603–5606; (c) Baldwin,
J. E.; Farthing, C. N.; Russel, A. T.; Schoffield, C. J.;
Spivey, A. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3761–3764.
4. Nahmany, M.; Melman, A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3733–3735.
The examples in Table 1 demonstrate the versatility of
this method. Alcohols, including sterically hindered