unreported ethyl 2-chlorooxazole-4-carboxylate (2) and the
2-bromo analogue 3 were identified as potential precursors.
The synthesis of the halooxazoles 2 and 3 is outlined in
Scheme 1. Ethyl 2-aminooxazole-4-carboxylate (1) was
Table 1. Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling Reactions of 2a
Scheme 1a
entry
R
conditions time (h)
product yield (%)
1
2
3
4
Ph
vinyl
2-pyridyl
CtCPh
i
1
4
4
6
5a
5b
5c
5d
87
84
73
0
ii
iii
iv
a Reaction conditions: (i) Pd(Ph3P)4, PhB(OH)2, aq K2CO3, PhMe, 90
°C; (ii) Pd(Ph3P)2Cl2, CH2dCHSnBu3, dioxane, 100 °C; (iii) Pd(Ph3P)4,
2-pyridylzinc bromide, THF, 65 °C; (iv) Pd(Ph3P)2Cl2, CuI, phenylacetylene,
Et3N, 80 °C.
and 1 equiv of vinyltributyltin, coupling at the 2-position
afforded 5b in 84% isolated yield (entry 2). The Negishi
coupling reaction of 2 with 2-pyridylzinc bromide in THF
at reflux gave 5c in 73% yield (entry 3).17 Sonogashira
reaction of 2 with phenylacetylene gave a resinous material
and it was not possible to isolate the expected product, 5d,
from the mixture (entry 4).18 Low yields for the Sonogashira
reaction of 2-bromothiazoles11a,12b and 2-iodoimidazoles12b
have also been reported. In summary, Suzuki, Stille, and
Negishi reactions with the 2-chlorooxazole 2 all gave good
yields of the expected oxazoles 5a-c although a Sonogashira
reaction failed. In principle, the carboxylic functionality at
C-4 could now be exploited by a range of synthetic
maneuvers leading to a variety of 2,4-disubstituted oxazoles.
The synthesis of trisubstituted oxazoles via the installation
of substituents at the 5-position was investigated next. One
possibility was to utilize the 2,5-dibromooxazole 4. It was
anticipated that a palladium-catalyzed coupling reaction
would be selective for the more electron-deficient 2-position
and that the C-2 substituent could be introduced first. A
second coupling could then be used to install the C-5
substituent. Under standard Suzuki conditions, and 1 equiv
of phenylboronic acid, the dibromooxazole 4 gave a complex
mixture of products. Analysis of the crude reaction mixture
a Reaction conditions: (i) tBuONO (1.5 equiv), CuCl2 (1.5 equiv),
CH3CN, 80 °C (83%); (ii) tBuONO (1.5 equiv), CuBr2 (1.5 equiv),
CH3CN, 80 °C (3, 21%, 4, 16%).
prepared, on a 100-g scale, by the condensation of ethyl
bromopyruvate and urea at 100 °C.13 The 2-aminooxazole 1
was then treated with 1.5 equiv of tert-butyl nitrite and
copper(II) chloride in acetonitrile yielding 2-chlorooxazole
2 in 83% yield.14 Replacing the copper(II) chloride with
copper(II) bromide gave a low yield of a separable mixture
of 2-bromooxazole 3 and the 2,5-dibromooxazole 4. In an
attempt to improve the selectivity for the formation of either
3 or the potentially useful dibromide 4, the stoichiometry of
the reagents and temperature of the reaction were varied.
However, similar product distributions and low isolated
yields were the result. Under similar reaction conditions,
Doyle has observed that the reaction of anilines also gave
byproducts due to substitution of bromide either ortho or
para to the original amine substituent.14
With a large quantity of the chlorooxazole 2 in hand, its
palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with a variety
of organometallic reagents were examined. Under standard
Suzuki conditions15 and 1 equiv of phenylboronic acid,
coupling at the 2-position was observed, affording 5a in 87%
isolated yield (entry 1, Table 1). The Stille coupling reaction
was investigated next.12c,16 With use of standard conditions
1
by H NMR and LC-MS indicated the presence of mono-
and disubstituted coupled products and also products arising
from debromination of the coupled products and of the
starting material. It was decided not to pursue this approach
further but instead to utilize the 2,4-disubstituted oxazoles
5a-d prepared earlier.
The oxazole 5a was brominated at the 5-position by
treatment with N-bromosuccinimide in refluxing chloroform
and gave the bromide 6 in 86% yield. Under standard Suzuki
(12) (a) Li, J. J.; Gribble, G. W. In Palladium in Heterocyclic Chemistry;
Pergamon Press: Elmsford, Oxford, UK, 2000; Chapter 8, pp 321-333.
(b) Sakamoto, T.; Nagata, H.; Kondo, Y.; Shiraiwa, M.; Yamanaka, H.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1987, 35, 823. (c) Barrett, A. G. M.; Kohrt, J. T. Synlett
1995, 415. (d) Kelly, T. R.; Lang, F. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4633. (e)
Jeong, S.; Chen. X.; Harran, P. G. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8640. (f) Boto,
A.; Ling, M.; Meek, G.; Pattenden G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8167.
(g) Vedejs, E.; Luchetta, L. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1011. (h) Schaus,
J. V.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 469. (i) Smith, A. B., III; Minibiole,
K. P.; Verhoest, P. R.; Schelhaas, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10942.
(j) Clapham, B.; Sutherland, A. J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 9033.
(13) Crank, G.; Foulis, M. J. J. Med. Chem. 1971, 14, 1075.
(14) Doyle, M. P.; Siegfried, B.; Dellaria, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42,
2426.
(16) (a) Stille, J. K. Angew. Chem. 1986, 98, 504. (b) Stille, J. K. Pure
Appl. 1985, 57, 1771.
(17) Negishi, E.; King, A. O.; Okukado, N. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42,
1821.
(18) (a) Cassar, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1975, 93, 253. (b) Dieck, H.
A.; Heck, R. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1975, 93, 259. (c) Sonogashira, K.;
Tohda, Y.; Nagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 4467. (d) Takahashi,
S.; Kuroyama, Y.; Sonogashira, K.; Nagihara, N. Synthesis 1980, 627.
(15) (a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem ReV. 1995, 95, 2457. (b) Suzuki,
A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 147.
2906
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 17, 2002