Communications
shift of 2 is about 26000 cmÀ1, even larger than that of 1
(15000 cmÀ1) and hence about 5 to 40 times the typical
Stokeꢀs shift of typical laser dyes.[8]
Azaacridine 2 also has a Cs singlet ground state with a
DEST of 15.1 kcalmolÀ1; note that this gap is significantly
larger at B3LYP/6-31G* (21.1 kcalmolÀ1). The C2 singlet state
lies 7.9 kcalmolÀ1 higher in energy and displays an even larger
basis set effect on the DEST (20.8 at B3LYP/6-31G* and only
6.2 kcalmolÀ1 at our reference level). Stability tests showed
no instabilities in the wavefunctions of the singlet states; in
other words, the small DEST can be interpreted on the basis of
aromaticity/antiaromaticity (see below). Like anthracene 1,
acridine 2 is highly polar (dipole moment: 8.2 D) and displays
pronounced charge separation. The nitrogen atom in the
central ring is the most negatively polarized (À0.53 according
to a natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis) and is also the
preferred site of protonation (in either the Cs or C2 form);
protonation at N3 and N2 is 3.8 and 18.4 kcalmolÀ1 less
favorable, respectively. This is nicely confirmed by the crystal
structure of 2-H+.
Figure 4. HOMOs of 2 and cyclobutadiene (only one of the two degen-
erate HOMOs is shown).
cyclobutadiene is in the same range (5.9 kcalmolÀ1 at B3LYP/
6-311 + G** and 11.5 kcalmolÀ1 at CCSD(T)/cc-pVDZ//
B3LYP/6-311 + G**)[10] as that of 1 and 2, which lends further
support to the proposal that these polycyclic structures are
indeed stable antiaromatic entities. Although this formally
contradicts the conclusions of Wudl und Houk et al.[3] for
TPH-anthracene that double cyanine ion stabilization of
zwitterion 1a is preferred over the formal 16-p antiaroma-
ticity (1b),[11] we remark that the earlier study computation-
ally examined a smaller model system with a
The computed NICS values in the ring centers (Table 3)
reveal that all three rings of acridine 2 are antiaromatic. The
smaller basis set, which has a large effect on
the energies (see above). However, the two
conclusions are not necessarily mutually
exclusive because the systems under con-
sideration are only weakly antiaromatic and
partially avoid this unfavorable situation
through strong polarization.
In conclusion, TPH-acridine, which we
have synthesized and characterized, repre-
Table 3: NICS values (B3LYP/6-311+G**//B3LYP/6-31G*) of 1, 2, and 2-H+.
NICS value
relative to
ring center
1
2
2-H+
Cyclobutadiene (D4h)
inner
outer
inner
outer
inner
outer
0.0
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
+0.6
À1.1
À2.0
À0.2
+0.2
+0.2
+7.9
+5.6
+2.6
+0.7
+0.2
+0.1
+3.5
+0.9
À1.1
À0.5
À0.2
À0.2
+6.3
+4.0
+1.4
+0.1
À0.1
À0.2
+3.1
+1.5
+0.3
+0.2
0.0
+4.1
+1.9
À0.1
À0.3
À0.2
À0.2
+27.1
+27.9
+19.0
+4.5
+1.2
+0.4
sents the first hexaazaacridine. The struc-
ture and spectroscopic properties of TPH-
acridine and TPH-anthracene were studied
À0.1
same is true for 1 although the degree of antiaromaticity
varies more strongly. As NICS values in the ring centers often
are affected by the s electrons of neighboring bonds, we also
computed the NICS values above the ring centers and
compare these with the extreme case of an antiaromatic
species, namely D4h cyclobutadiene.[9] This analysis shows that
the outer rings of 1, 2, and 2-H+ at 0.5 above the ring of the
plane are, with the exception of the inner ring of 1, weakly
antiaromatic. NICS points that are further away from the ring
centers demonstrate that the antiaromatic character
decreases rapidly, in particular for the inner rings; these
NICS values are typical for nonaromatic structures. The
decrease in antiaromaticity, which is much more pronounced
than for cyclobutadiene, can be rationalized by differences in
the ring size and the high polarity of the heterocycles in 1 and
2.
by DFT computations and NICS analysis.
TPH-acridine and TPH-anthracene represent highly zwitter-
ionic structures with very low-lying triplet states. Both
polycyclic structures can be considered to be stable 16-p-
electron, weakly antiaromatic entities. TPH-acridine and
TPH-anthracene are of great theoretical and structural
interest and exhibit exciting physical properties that may be
utilized in organomagnetic applications.
Received: March 6, 2005
Published online: July 20, 2005
Keywords: antiaromaticity · aromaticity · density functional
.
theory · hexaazaacridine · hexaazaanthracene
Hence, 1 and 2 must be considered to be stable, weakly
antiaromatic molecules with highly polar singlet ground
states. Our conclusions are further supported by visual
inspection of the HOMO of 2 (Cs; Figure 4), which is
symmetrically p-antibonding. This is in analogy to the
simplest neutral antiaromatic singlet, the highly unstable
D4h-symmetric cyclobutadiene (it is common knowledge that
it has a triplet ground state). Remarkably, the DEST for
[1] For oligothiophenes with low-lying triplet states see: a) F.
Garnier, Angew. Chem. 1989, 101, 529; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1989, 28, 513; b) F. Garnier, A. Yassar, R. Hajlaoui, G.
Horowitz, F. Deloffre, B. Servet, S. Ries, P. Alnot, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 8716; c) F. Garnier, R. Hajlaoui, A. Yassar, P.
Srivastava, Science 1994, 265, 1684; d) A. Dodabalapur, L. Torsi,
H. E. Katz, Science 1995, 268, 270; e) A. Dodabalapur, L. J.
Rothberg, A. W. P. Fung, H. E. Katz, Science 1996, 272, 1462; a
low-lying triplet state was predicted for the not-yet-synthesized
5258
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5255 –5259