Angewandte
Chemie
molecular Chemistry of Anions (Eds.: A. Bianchi, K. Bowman-
anion-binding sites. Addition of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
to a solution of 1 in chloroform led to a strong solvation of the
hydrogen-bond donor sites of the ureido functions.[23,24] This
solvation caused a weakening of the binding ability of 1
toward ion-paired salts[25] and allowed the determination of
James, E. Garcia-Espana), VCH, Weinheim, 1997.
[4] a) G. Cafeo, G. Gattuso, F. H. Kohnke, A. Notti, S. Occhipinti, S.
Pappalardo, M. F. Parisi, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2226 – 2230;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2122 – 2126; b) K. Kavallieratos,
B. A. Moyer, Chem. Commun. 2001, 1620 – 1621.
[5] a) L. Kovbasyuk, R. Krꢀmer, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3163 – 3187;
b) A. J. Evans, P. D. Beer, Dalton Trans. 2003, 4451 – 4456; c) A.
Arduini, G. Giorgi, A. Pochini, A. Secchi, F. Ugozzoli, J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 8302 – 8308.
1
the association constants by H NMR spectroscopy. Table 2
shows that among the substrates investigated the longer C12
and C16 guest salts are more tightly bound than C8 and C10 by 1
as the result of capsular complexation.
[6] For representative examples, see: a) J. M. Mahoney, A. M.
Beatty, B. D. Smith, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 7617 – 7621, and
references therein; b) M. Barboiu, G. Vaughan, A. van der Lee,
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3073 – 3076; c) M.-L. Lehaire, R. Scopelliti, H.
Piotrowski, K. Severin, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1477 – 1480;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1419 – 1422; d) M. J. Deetz, M.
Shang, B. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6201 – 6207;
e) D. J. White, N. Laing, H. Miller, S. Parsone, S. Coles, P. A.
Tasker, Chem. Commun. 1999, 2077 – 2078; f) J. Scheerder,
J. P. M. van Duynhoven, J. F. J. Engbersen, D. N. Reinhoudt,
Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1172 – 1175; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 1090 – 1093.
[7] a) T. Haino, M. Nakamura, N. Kato, M. Hiraoka, Y. Fukazawa,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2281 – 2284; b) G. Tumcharern, T.
Tuntulani, S. J. Coles, M. B. Hursthouse, J. D. Kilburn, Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 4971 – 4974; c) J. M. Mahoney, J. P. Davis, A. M. Beatty,
B. D. Smith, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9819 – 9820; d) J. L. Atwood,
A. Szumna, Chem. Commun. 2003, 940 – 941.
Table 2: Association constants (Ka) of a,w-alkanediyldiammonium
dichloride salts with receptor 1 in CDCl3/[D6]DMSO (3:2).[a]
H3N+(CH2)n+NH3·2ClÀ
Ka [mÀ1
]
n=8
212[b]
163[b]
n=10
n=12
n=14
n=16
2.4103
[c]
–
2.6103
[a] Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy at 22Æ18C using equimolar
(110À3 m) host–guest mixtures. Values are derived from the average of
at least three independent measurements (standard errorꢁ15%). [b] Ka
values refer to the S-shaped 1:1 complex. [c] Measurements of Ka were
precluded by the limited solubility of the salt.
[8] F. Fages, J.-P. Desvergne, K. Kampke, H. Bouas-Laurent, J.-M.
Lehn, M. Meyer, A.-M. Albrecht-Gary, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 3658 – 3664.
[9] a) J. W. Lee, S. Samal, N. Selvapalam, H.-J. Kim, K. Kim, Acc.
Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 621 – 630; b) W. L. Mock, N.-Y. Shih, J. Org.
Chem. 1983, 48, 3618 – 3619.
[10] K. Tsubaki, H. Tanaka, T. Futura, K. Tanaka, T. Kinoshita, K.
Fuji, Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5611 – 5617.
[11] J. W. H. Smeets, R. P. Sijibesma, L. van Dalen, A. L. Spek,
W. J. J. Smeets, R. J. M. Nolte, J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3710 –
3717.
[12] a) M. J. Crossley, P. Thordarson, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1785 –
1788; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1709 – 1712; b) Y. Kubo, Y.
Murai, J.-i. Yamanaka, S. Tokita, Y. Ishimaru, Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 6019 – 6023.
[13] D. Garozzo, G. Gattuso, F. H. Kohnke, P. Malvagna, A. Notti, S.
Occhipinti, S. Pappalardo, M. F. Parisi, I. Pisagatti, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 7663– 7667.
[14] a) F. P. Ballistreri, A. Notti, S. Pappalardo, M. F. Parisi, I.
Pisagatti, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1071 – 1074; b) F. Arnaud-Neu, S.
Fuangswasdi, A. Notti, S. Pappalardo, M. F. Parisi, Angew.
Chem. 1998, 110, 120 – 122; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 112 –
114.
The binding selectivity order of 1 toward C12, C14, and C16
as chloride salts was estimated from the ESI-MS distribution
percentages[26] of the relevant capsular complexes ([1·Cn]2+
ions). A competitive complexation experiment of 1 with a
mixture of the three salts (1/C12·2ClÀ/C14·2ClÀ/C16·2ClÀ =
1:1:1:1; c = 1.0 10À4 m in CHCl3/CH3OH (1:1)) gave the
order
tively).[27,28]
In conclusion, we have synthesized a novel heterotetra-
C14 > C16 > C12 (60.5, 24.6, and 14.9%, respec-
topic receptor, 1, that efficiently and selectively forms ligand-
separated ion-pair complexes with long-chain a,w-alkane-
diyldiammonium dichloride salts by combining the coopera-
tive action of two converging calix[5]arene cavities in the
encapsulation of the dication with the ability of the two ureido
functions to bind the relevant counteranions. Future work will
be directed toward the design of new heteropolytopic systems
with specific recognition patterns.
Received: March 17, 2005
Published online: July 6, 2005
[15] For a review on molecular encapsulation, see: F. Hof, S. L. Craig,
C. Nuckolls, J. Rebek, Jr., Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1556 – 1578;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1488 – 1508.
[16] D. R. Stewart, M. Krawiec, R. M. Kashyap, W. H. Watson, C. D.
Gutsche, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 586 – 601.
Keywords: calixarenes · host–guest systems ·
inclusion compounds · ion pairs · molecular recognition
.
[17] C. A. Schalley, R. K. Castellano, M. S. Brody, D. M. Rudkevich,
G. Siuzdak, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4568 –
4579.
[1] Reviews: a) P. A. Gale, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 191 – 221;
b) P. D. Beer, P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 502 – 532;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 486 – 516.
[18] D. Garozzo, G. Gattuso, F. H. Kohnke, A. Notti, S. Pappalardo,
M. F. Parisi, I. Pisagatti, A. J. P. White, D. J. Williams, Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 4025 – 4028.
[19] The guest is rather short to span the two calix[5]arene cavities,
and the shielding experienced by the included chain is less
effective than that observed with the longer, more tightly bound
guest salts.
[2] a) A. Arduini, E. Brindani, G. Giorgi, A. Pochini, A. Secchi, J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6188 – 6194; b) S. Bartoli, S. Roelens, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8307 – 8315; c) V. Böhmer, A. Dalla Cort,
L. Mandolini, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1900 – 1902; d) R. Shukla,
T. Kida, B. D. Smith, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3099 – 3102.
[3] a) I. Krossing, I. Raabe, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 2116 – 2142;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2066 – 2090; b) The Supra-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4892 –4896ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim