where the yellow and blue regions represent the hydrophobic core
and hydrophilic poly(Sar) chains, respectively.
In the model shown in Fig. 5a, the assembly of eight
molecules of LP and 8RD takes a planar structure on the
whole, which stacks continuously to yield worm-like micelles.
The worm-like shape shown in Fig. 5a however cannot explain
the disk shape observed by TEM. In the other model shown in
Fig. 5b, eight poly(Sar) chains of eight LP molecules and eight
poly(Sar) chains of 8RD are extended to one face of
the dendritic core plane, and the two dendritic core planes
associate face-to-face. This unit may grow in one direction via
contact between plane edges where poly(Sar) chain density is
low. The model shown in Fig. 5b fits to the results of TEM
observations as shown in Fig. 5c.
Fig. 4 Negative staining TEM micrographs of self-assemblies
prepared at the feed molar ratio of 8 : 1 with sonication for 10 seconds.
The right micrograph is the magnified one of the left micrograph. Each
scale bar represents 50 nm.
In summary, eight left-handed helices were incorporated
into a 2nd generation dendrimer bearing eight right-handed
helices at the terminals via stereocomplex formation. This
supramolecular assembly occurred stoichiometrically through
1 : 1 association of the right-handed helix and the left-handed
helix. With this strategy of stereocomplex formation, dendrimers
can be designed as a host platform for accommodating
a defined number of guest molecules with a specified size.
A 3rd generation dendrimer is under research as a template for
sixteen helices.
We gratefully acknowledge the technical help of Prof. J.
Sugiyama, Kyoto University, for TEM measurements.
Notes and references
1 D. E. Discher and A. Eisenberg, Science, 2002, 297, 967–973.
2 F. Wang, T. K. Bronich, A. V. Kabanov, R. D. Rauh and
J. Roovers, Bioconjugate Chem., 2005, 16, 397–405.
3 D. Peer, J. M. Karp, S. Hong, O. C. Farokhzad, R. Margalit and
R. Langer, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 751–760.
4 Y. Geng, P. Dalhaimer, S. Cai, R. Tsai, M. Tewari, T. Minko and
D. E. Discher, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 249–255.
5 H. Tanisaka, S. Kizaka-Kondoh, A. Makino, S. Tanaka, M. Hiraoka
and S. Kimura, Bioconjugate Chem., 2008, 19, 109–117.
6 H. Hashizume, P. Baluk, S. Morikawa, J. W. McLean,
G. Thurston, S. Roberge, R. K. Jain and D. M. McDonald, Am.
J. Pathol., 2000, 156, 1363–1380.
7 H. Maeda, K. Greish and J. Fang, Adv. Polym. Sci., 2006, 193,
103–121.
8 H. Koide, T. Asai, K. Hatanaka, K. Shimizu, M. Yokoyama,
T. Ishida, H. Kiwada and N. Oku, Yaku. Zass., 2009, 129, 1445–1451.
9 C. Wong, T. Stylianopoulos, J. Cui, J. Martin, V. P. Chauhan, W. Jiang,
Z. Popovic, R. K. Jain, M. G. Bawendi and D. Fukumura, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2011, 108, 2426–2431.
10 H. Cabral, Y. Matsumoto, K. Mizuno, Q. Chen, M. Murakami,
M. Kimura, Y. Terada, M. R. Kano, K. Miyazono, M. Uesaka,
N. Nishiyama and K. Kataoka, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, 6,
815–823.
11 B. F. Lin, R. S. Marullo, M. J. Robb, D. V. Krogstad, P. Antoni,
C. J. Hawker, L. M. Campos and M. V. Tirrell, Nano Lett., 2011,
11, 3946–3950.
12 M. Ueda, A. Makino, T. Imai, J. Sugiyama and S. Kimura, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 3204–3206.
13 M. Ueda, A. Makino, T. Imai, J. Sugiyama and S. Kimura,
Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 4143–4146.
14 T. Kanzaki, Y. Horikawa, A. Makino, J. Sugiyama and
S. Kimura, Macromol. Biosci., 2008, 8, 1026–1033.
15 D. A. Tomalia, A. M. Naylor and W. A. Goddard III, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1990, 209, 138–175.
Fig. 5 The model structures of self-assemblies prepared at the feed
molar ratio of 8 : 1 (a, b). The yellow and the blue regions represent
the hydrophobic core and the hydrophilic poly(Sar) chains, respec-
tively. (c) The unit model structure for the smallest self-assemblies
prepared at the feed molar ratio of 8 : 1 with 10 seconds sonication.
The noted sizes show the results from DLS and TEM.
were reduced down to 13–14 nm diameter and 6 nm thickness. The
molecular structure of this smallest disk-shape assembly is
discussed under the assumption that the dendritic core with eight
hydrophobic helices at the terminals is hydrophobic with a planar
structure in the assemblies. This planar structure is generally
allowed for 2nd generation dendrimers.15 Consequently, two
structural models are considered, as shown in Fig. 5a and b,
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6181–6183 6183