We became interested in the synthesis of these compounds
(especially 1) via bridged indole intermediates, such as 4,
as part of project examining bridgehead metalation chem-
istry.8 We believed that key intermediates, such as 4 (where
X is a protected alcohol or ketone function), would be
available by strategic disconnection at either bond a or bond
b, the forward reactions involving either intramolecular eno-
late arylation of 5 or aldol-type reaction of 6 (Scheme 1).
bridged structures, methylene-bridged product 9 and diketone
10, in roughly equal amounts.
This unexpected but pleasing result was confirmed by
detailed spectroscopic analysis of both compounds, the
structure of indole 9 also being secured by subsequent X-ray
crystallographic analysis (Figure 2).
Scheme 1
After our initial efforts to cyclize ketone 5 (X ) H) and
similar structures (obtained through indole Michael addition
to appropriate enones) proved unsuccessful, we turned instead
to the synthesis and reactions of indole aldehydes of structure
6. Similar intermediates have been accessed previously by
Deng and Konopelski, who utilized an indole-lead partner
in a key coupling process with an elaborated cyclohexanone.6a
Figure 2. ORTEP drawing of indole 9.
The reaction can be rationalized by invoking initial aldol
condensation to give 11, followed by dehydration to give
12 (both of these steps might be expected to be reversible).
Hydride transfer from C* of 11 to the corresponding position
in the extended iminium species 12 effects disproportionation
of 11, leading to the observed products (Scheme 3).
Palladium-catalyzed coupling of cyclohexanone with bro-
moindole 7, under conditions based on those described by
Buchwald,9 gave a product ketone, which on subsequent
Vilsmeier-Hack formylation then gave indole 8 ()6 where
X ) H and R ) Me) (Scheme 2).10 Attempted aldol-type
ring closure of 8 by reaction with bases ranging from
Ca(OH)2 to LDA gave no sign of the desired product. In
contrast, exposure to acidic conditions gave rise to two
Scheme 3
Scheme 2 a
Although this was a very exciting result, the formation of
two products was clearly problematic, and we sought
(5) (a) Wood, J. L.; Holubec, A. A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Weiss, M. M.; Dixon,
J. A.; Doan, B. D.; Shamji, M. F.; Chen, J. M.; Heffron, T. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 6326. (b) Ready, J. M.; Reisman, S. E.; Hirata, M.; Weiss,
M. M.; Tamaki, K.; Ovaska, T. V.; Wood, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 1270.
(6) For other synthetic efforts, see: (a) Deng, H. B.; Konopelski, J. P.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3001. (b) Jung, M. E.; Slowinski, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 6835. (c) Lopez-Alvarado, P.; Garcia-Granda, S.; Alvarez-Rua,
C.; Avendano, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1702.
(7) Avendano, C.; Mene´ndez, J. C. Curr. Org. Synth. 2004, 1, 65.
(8) (a) Blake, A. J.; Giblin, G. M. P.; Kirk, D. T.; Simpkins, N. S.;
Wilson, C. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2668. (b) Giblin, G. M. P.; Kirk, D. T.;
Mitchell, L.; Simpkins, N. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1673.
a Reagents: (a) cyclohexanone, Pd(OAc)2 (1 mol %), K3PO4 (2.3
equiv), (2-biphenyl)dicyclohexylphosphine (2.5 mol %), THF, 100
°C (sealed tube), 24 h, 51-73%; (b) POCl3, DMF, 0 °C, then KOH
(aq) 75%; (c) p-TsOH (0.5 equiv) THF, 50 °C, 24 h, 60% (9:10
ca. 1:1).
(9) (a) Fox, J. M.; Huang, X.; Chieffi, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 1360. (b) For a relevant review, see: Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig,
J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 234.
4088
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 19, 2005