3918
M.N. Sokolov et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 3914–3918
ligands, the origin of the visible absorption is no doubt
in dp(Re) ! p(L) charge-transfer transitions. On chang-
ing solvent, a solvatochromism is observed. The solu-
tions in acetonitrile are red, but addition of methanol
gradually changes the color to orange. Up to the 1:1
(v/v) CH3CN/CH3OH ratio the changes are negligible,
but with the increasing concentration of methanol the
peak at 550 nm becomes a shoulder, and the other peak
at 488 nm undergoes an hypsochromic shift by 15 nm.
The solvatochromism can be explained by the formation
of hydrogen bonds between the N–H bond of the imi-
dazolic ring and solvent molecules, in the expected order
CHCl3 < CH3CN < CH3OH. In the solid, the pbimz
ring forms a hydrogen bond with Clꢀ. It is possible that
the N–Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁCl bonded ionic pairs persist in CHCl3 solu-
tion, while in more polar CH3CN and especially in
CH3OH, they dissociate and Clꢀ is replaced by a solvent
molecule. The ionic pairing was detected in solutions of
[ReCl2(PPh3)2(biimH2)]Cl and [ReCl2(PPh3)2(biimH2)]-
(RCO2) [14]. The complex is paramagnetic, showing a
temperature-dependent paramagnetism, in the range of
0.87 B.M. (80 K)–1.48 B.M. (300 K). These data are in
agreement with the presence of high-spin d4-Re(III) cen-
ters. Typical values for octahedral Re(III) complexes are
1.3–2.1 B.M. For example, the complexes with biimidaz-
ole [ReX2(PPh3)2(biimH2)]X have the room-temperature
magnetic moments 1.30 (X = Cl), 1.64 (X = Br) and
1.59 (X = I) B.M. [14]. This paramagnetism makes
impossible observation of the signal in 31P NMR spec-
tra, but PMR spectrum was obtained, displaying large
paramagnetic shifts between ꢀ0.4 and 15.8 ppm. The
protons in o-, m- and p-position of the phenyl ring in
PPh3 are observed at 8.3, 13.1 and 8.5 ppm, respectively.
Similar paramagnetic shifts are observed in the PMR
spectra of the biimH2 and bipy complexes [13,14]. The
observation of only one set of phenylic peaks indicates
that no isomerization occurs in the solution. Cyclic vol-
tammetry of 1 in CHCl3 (with Bu4NPF6 as supporting
electrolyte) shows a quasi-reversible one electron reduc-
tion (E1/2 = 920 mV, DE = 134 mV). It is well known
that pyridine-containing chelates stabilize Re(II) and
Tc(II) oxidation states. The cyclic voltammetry of [Re-
Cl2(PPhMe2 ꢀ x)2(bipy)]+ shows reversible one-electron
reduction at a very close potential [13]. The Tc(II) com-
plexes, cis(Cl),trans(P)-[TcCl2(PPh3)2(L–L)] are easily
obtained by reduction of the corresponding monoca-
tions. This reduction wave was not observed with Bu4N-
ClO4 as supporting electrolyte. This may be explained
by electrocatalysis: the Re(II) complex, once formed, re-
duces ClO4ꢀ. Electrocatalytic reduction of perchlorate is
of interest, since it has become one of the industrial pol-
lutants. Other Re complexes are efficient in this process
[17].
couples. Alternatively, the more anodic peak may corre-
spond to one-electron reduction of [ReCl3(OPPh3)-
(pbimz)]ꢀ, which could form in the solution by ligand
replacement. In any case, 2 is much more difficult to
reduce than [ReCl4(bipy)] which shows two reversible
one-electron reductions with E1/2 = ꢀ40 and ꢀ1260 V
(in DMF-CH3CN, versus SCE) [13].
In the FAB-MS of 1, the highest m/z peak is due to
the [ReCl2(PPh3)2(pbimz)]+ parent ion. The next two
fragments correspond to the parent ion having lost
one or two phosphines, phosphine (M ꢀ PPh3)+ and
(M ꢀ 2PPh3)+, which suggests that the coordinated
phosphines dissociate more easily than the halides. In
the case of 2, it is interesting to note that under the
FAB-MS conditions there is an interaction between
the two molecular components of the compound, giving
rise to the peaks of [ReCl3(pbimz)(OPPh3)]+ and
[ReOCl(pbimz)]+ instead of the expected molecular
peak.
Acknowledgments
A grant of Russian Science Support Foundation to
MNS is gratefully acknowledged. The work was sup-
ported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research
(Grant 04-03-32159). The authors thank Dr. V.N. Ikor-
ski for the magnetic measurements.
References
[1] J. Ferguson, F. Herren, E.R. Krauz, M. Maeder, J. Vranacic,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 64 (1985) 21.
[2] A. Juris, V. Balzani, F. Barigelletti, S. Campagna, P. Belser, A.
von Zelewsky, Coord. Chem. Rev. 84 (1988) 85.
[3] J.-P. Sauvage, J.-P. Collin, J.-C. Chambron, S. Guillerez, C.
Coudret, Chem. Rev. 94 (1994) 993.
[4] K.S. Schanze, D.B. MacQueen, T.A. Perkins, L.A. Cabana,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 122 (1993) 63.
[5] L.E. Helberg, S.D. Orth, M. Sabat, W.D. Harman, Inorg. Chem.
35 (1996) 5584.
[6] K.K.-W. Lo, W.-K. Hui, D.Ch.-M. Ng, K.-K. Cheung, Inorg.
Chem. 41 (2002) 40.
[7] K.A. Waters, Y.-J. Kim, J.T. Hupp, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 2909.
[8] K. Wang, L. Huang, L. Gao, L. Jin, Ch. Huang, Inorg. Chem. 41
(2002) 3353.
[9] N.P. Johnson, C.J.L. Lock, G. Wilkinson, J. Chem. Soc. A (1964)
1054.
[10] G. Roushias, G. Wilkinson, J. Chem. Soc. A (1967) 993.
[11] G.M. Sheldrick, SHELX-97 Release 97-2, University of Goettingen,
Germany, 1998.
[12] M. Stebler, A. Gutierrez, A. Ludi, H.B. Buergi, Inorg. Chem. 26
(1987) 1449.
[13] J. Caspar, B.P. Sullivan, T.J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 23 (1984)
2104.
[14] S. Fortin, A.L. Beauchamp, Inorg. Chem. 40 (2001) 105.
[15] B.E. Wilcox, D.M. Ho, E. Deutsch, Inorg. Chem. 28 (1989) 3917.
[16] B. Machura, J.O. Dzie˛gielewski, R. Kruszynksi, T.J. Bartczak, J.
Kusz, Polyhedron 22 (2003) 2573.
[17] M.M. Abu-Omar, L.D. McPherson, J. Arias, V.M. Bereau,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 4310.
Complex 2 in chloroform shows two consecutive qua-
si-reversible reductions at ꢀ750 and ꢀ1200 mV, which
can be attributed to Re(IV)/Re(III) and Re(III)/Re(II)