our DTBS-directing R-selective galactosylation6 for 4-MU
T-antigen synthesis.
Scheme 2. Condensation of 7 and 4-Methylumbelliferone 8
Taking the advantage of the compatibility of our R-selec-
tive galactosylation with acyl functionality on C-2 amino
groups, we designed the N-2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl
(Troc)-protected disaccharide 7 as a DTBS glycosyl donor.
Treatment of the readily accessible 2-N-Troc galactothiogly-
coside 27 with DTBS(OTf)2 in pyridine8 gave 4,6-silylated
3 in 93% yield, which was then orthogonally glycosylated
with the 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-acetyl-â-D-galactopyranose 4
catalyzed by trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate9 to
afford disaccharide 5 in 67% yield. The hemiacetalization
of 5 with NBS in aqueous acetone10 produced 6. Finally,
the hemiacetal 6 was converted into the corresponding
chloride 7 by the action of Vilsmeier’s reagent11 (Scheme
1).
Scheme 1. Preparation of Gal â(1f3) GalN Disaccharide
6 was reacted with 8 in the presence of various combinations
of trialkyl phosphines (TPP,12 TBP,13,15 DPPE14) and azo-
compounds (DEAD,12 ADDP,13 TMAD,15 DIAD12,14) as
summarized in Table 1. Surprisingly, the anomeric config-
Table 1. 4-Methylumbelliferylation by Mitsunobu Reaction
phosphine/azo MU-OH
% yieldc
(R/â)
entry
compdb
(equiv) solvent T (°C)
With the glycosyl chloride 7 in hand, we then subjected
it to a DTBS-directing R-glycosidation with 4-methyl-
umbelliferone. Initially, we attempted reaction of the R-chlo-
ride 7 with 4-methylumbelliferone 8 in the presence of the
silver triflate-γ-collidine complex.5 This reaction provided
the R-glycoside 9 exclusively in 24% yield together with
the hemiacetal 6 as the main byproduct (Scheme 2).
However, the yield could not be elevated any further.
Accordingly, we next investigated the utility of the
Mitsunobu reaction in this capacity.12 Thus, the hemiacetal
1d
2e
3f
4g
5
TPP/DEAD
TBP/ADDP
TBP/TMAD
DPPE/DIAD
TPP/DEAD
TBP/ADDP
TPP/DEAD
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
8.0
THF
THF
THF
THF
toluene
toluene
toluene
80
80
80
47:5
20:-
8:-
no reaction
74:8
80
130
130
130
6
7
62:15
80:9
a Every reaction was conducted under reflux condition. b TPP, triphen-
ylphosphine, TBP, tributylphosphine, DPPE, 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)-
ethane, DEAD, diethyl azodicarboxylate, ADDP, 1,1′-(azodicarbonyl)dipi-
peridine, TMAD, 1,1′-azobis(N,N′-dimethylformamide), DIAD, diisopropyl
azodicarboxylate. c Isolated yield. d See ref 12. e See ref 13. f See ref 15.
g See ref 14.
(5) Szweda, R.; Spohr, U.; Lemieux, R. U.; Schindler, D.; Bishop, D.
F.; Desnick, R. J. Can. J. Chem. 1989, 67, 1388-1391.
(6) Imamura, A.; Ando, H.; Korogi, S.; Tanabe, G.; Muraoka, O.; Ishida,
H.; Kiso, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6725-6728.
(7) Compound 2 was derived from galactosamine hydrochloride through
four-step manipulation (65% overall) according to the method of 2-N-Troc
glucothioglycoside: Yan, F.; Mehta, S.; Eichler, E.; Wakarchuk, W. W.;
Gilbert, M.; Schur, M. J.; Whitfield, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2426-
2431.
uration of 6 was mostly retained; the R-glycoside 9 pre-
dominating in all these reactions. Interestingly, the yield of
9 increased when the reaction was performed at higher
(8) Furusawa, K.; Ueno, K.; Katsura, T. Chem. Lett. 1990, 97-100.
(9) (a) Ogawa, T.; Beppu, K.; Nakabayashi, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1981,
93. C6-C9. (b) Paulsen, H.; Paal, M. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 135, 53-69.
(10) Kaesbeck, L.; Kessler, H. Liebigs. Ann. Chem. 1997, 169-173.
(11) (a) Newman, M. S.; Sujeeth, P. K. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3, 4367-
4369. (b) Iversen, T.; Bundle, D. R. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 103, 29-40.
(12) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1-28.
(13) Tsunoda, T.; Yamamiya, Y.; Ito, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
1639-1642.
(14) O’Neil, I. A.; Thompson, S.; Murray, C. L.; Kalindjian, S. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7787-7790.
(15) (a) Tsunoda, T.; Otsuka, J.; Yamamiya, Y.; Ito, S. Chem. Lett. 1994,
539-542. (b) Tsunoda, T.; Yamamiya, Y.; Kawamura, Y.; Ito, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2529-2530.
4416
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 20, 2005