2918
MV..Kaveri et al./ Spectrochimica Acta Part A 61 (2005) 2915–2918
Table 4
chelates may be due to the effect of the metal ion on the nor-
malcellprocess. Apossiblemodefortoxicityincreasemaybe
considered in the light of Tweedy’s chelation theory. Chela-
tion reduces the polarity of the metal ion because of partial
sharing of its positive charge with the donor groups and the
-electron delocalization over the whole chelate ring. Such
chelation could enhance the lipophilic character of the cen-
tral metal atom, which subsequently favours its permeation
through the lipid layers of the cell membrane. It has been ob-
served that complexes containing heterocyclic nitrogen base
possess more activity than other complexes.
Catalytic activity data of ruthenium(II) complexes
Complex
Rate constant, k (M−1 S−1
)
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(L1)]
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(L2)]
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(L3)]
1.8 × 10−2
2.1 × 10−2
3.0 × 10−2
Table 5
Antibacterial activity data of ruthenium(II) complexes
Compound
Diameter of inhibition
zone (mm)
E.coli
S.typhi
0.25%
0.5%
0.25%
0.5%
HL2
4
6
10
18
6
8
1
5
6
9
8
8
17
11
9
4. Conclusion
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(L2)]
[RuCl(CO)(py)(PPh3)(L2)]
[RuCl(CO)(pip)(PPh3)(L2)]
In conclusion, we have synthesized nine ruthe-
nium(II) complexes containing triphenylphosphine and 2ꢀ-
hydroxychalcones. All the complexes have been character-
ized on the basis of analytical and spectral data. The com-
plexes showed significant catalytic oxidation activity and bi-
ological activity.
20
Table 6
Antifungal activity data of ruthenium(II) complexes
Compound
Diameter inhibition zone (mm)
(A.fumigatus )
0.25%
0.5%
HL1
1.8
3.3
3.9
3.4
3.8
2.9
5.7
6.8
7
References
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(L1)]
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)(py)(L1)]
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)(pip)(L1)]
[RuCl(CO)(AsPh3)2(L1)]
[1] (a) K. Yasuda, S.V. Ley, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 (2002) 1024;
(b) J.D. Lou, Z.N. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 8843;
(c) S.V. Ley, A. Madin, in: B.M. Trost, I. Fleming (Eds.), Compre-
hensive Organic Synthesis, vol. 7, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991,
pp. 251–289.
7.9
rically by monitoring the increase in the cinnamic acid ab-
sorbance as a function of time. A CH2Cl2 solution of the
ruthenium(II) complex (2 cm3, 1 × 10−4 M) and freshly dis-
tilled cinnamaldehyde in CH2Cl2 (2 cm−3, 1 × 10−4 M) were
mixed in a 1 cm quartz cell at room temperature (26 ◦C) and
the absorbance change at 279 nm was recorded as a function
of time. The catalytic activity is found to increase with de-
crease in electron donating ability of the substituent present in
the coordinated ligands of the complexes [12]. Interestingly,
only alcoholic group of cinnamyl alcohol gets oxidized selec-
tively without affecting the double bonds. Plots of absorbance
versus time are linear. The slope of the line is equal the rate
constant (k) and the observed k values are given in Table 4.
There is no change in the absorbance at 279 nm in the absence
of the complex indicating the activity of the new complexes.
[2] I.E. Marko, P.R. Giles, M. Tsukazaki, S.M. Brown, C.J. Urch, Sci-
ence 274 (1996) 2044.
[3] (a) A. Wolfson, S. Wuyts, D.E. De Vos, I.F.J. Vankelecom, P.A. Ja-
cobs, Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 8107;
(b) R. Karvembu, K. Natarajan, Polyhedron 21 (2002) 219;
(c) A. Dijksman, A. Marino-Gonzalez, A.M.I. Payeras, I.W.C.E.
Arends, R.A. Sheldon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 6826.
[4] (a) R. Ramesh, S. Maheswaran, J. Inorg. Biochem. 96 (2003) 457;
(b) R. Karvembu, K. Natarajan, Polyhedron 21 (2002) 1721.
[5] (a) M. Palaniandavar, C. Natarajan, Aust. J. Chem. 33 (1980) 737;
(b) M. Palaniandavar, C. Natarajan, Aust. J. Chem. 8 (1983) 229;
(c) P. Shanthi, R. Murugesan, P.R. Athappan, C. Natarajan, Trans.
Metall. Chem. 17 (1992) 39.
[6] A.I. Vogel, Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., ELBS,
London, 1989.
[7] (a) C.H. Lin, C.T. Lin, C.L. Yeh, J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 14 (1969) 9;
(b) N. Dharmaraj, K. Natarajan, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.: Org.
Chem. 27 (1997) 361.
[8] (a) N. Ahmed, J.J. Levision, S.D. Robinson, M.F. Uttley, Inorg.
Synth. 15 (1974) 48;
3.3. Antibacterial activity
(b) S. Gopinathan, I.R. Unny, S.S. Deshpande, C. Gopinathan, Indian
J. Chem. A 25 (1986) 1015.
phi and Pseudomonas sp. and antifungal screening against
A.fumigatus of the ligands and some of their ruthenium(II)
complexes have been carried out by disc diffusion method
[13]. The results (Tables 5 and 6) show that the ruthenium
complexes are more toxic than their parent ligands against
the same microorganisms and under identical experimental
conditions. The increase in biological activity of the metal
[9] N. Fuson, M.-L. Josien, E.M. Shelton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 (1954)
2526.
[10] M.S. El-Shahawi, A.F. Shoair, Spectrochim. Acta A 60 (2004) 121.
[11] M.A. Bennett, M.J. Byrnes, A.C. Willis, Organometallics 22 (2003)
1018.
[12] R. Karvembu, S. Hemalatha, R. Prabhakaran, K. Natarajan, Inorg.
Chem. Commun. 6 (2003) 486.
[13] C.H. Collins, P.M. Lyne, Microbial Methods, University Park Press,
Baltimore, 1970.