Go et al.
different topologies as a result of different coordination
modes of the dcbp ligand: in the first polymorph, both
carboxylic groups are monodentate, while in the second
polymorph, one is bridging and the other is noncoordinating.
Another feature that distinguishes polycarboxylic ligands
from aromatic nitrogen-donor ligands is a much wider
variation in the degree of protonation and deprotonation,
which affects not only the ligand coordination ability but
also its charge and, therefore, the metal-to-ligand ratio and,
consequently, the resulting topology. Furthermore, carbox-
ylate groups are much more actively involved in hydrogen
bonding, as both acceptors (especially noncoordinating
oxygens of monodentate carboxylates) and donors (in the
case of protonated carboxylic groups). The optimization of
hydrogen-bonding interactions can become one of the
principal structure-determining factors. Many supramolecular
hydrogen-bonding patterns characteristic of carboxylate
anions and carboxylic acids are often encountered in
coordination polymers. For example, in purely organic
crystals, a ubiquitous “dicarboxylic dimer” connects coor-
dination polymer chains in a nickel 1,2,3-benzenetricarbox-
ylate.5 Other examples of these synthons are found in several
1,4-benzenedicarboxylates (BDCs) containing neutral H2BDC
as guest molecules: these molecules are located in one-
dimensional channels and form linear flat hydrogen-bonded
chains, which effectively become extended one-dimensional
templates.6
performed, and previously reported information has not been
critically systematized.
We have conducted a systematic study on the Ni(BDC)/
2,2′-bipyridine system. The introduction of 2,2′-bipyridine,
which has predictable coordination properties and almost
exclusively acts as a “terminal” chelating bidentate ligand,
confines the propagation of M/BDC/M linkages to one or
two dimensions and limits the extent of structural changes
that occur upon movement by a given increment in temper-
ature or pH, thus facilitating a more detailed study of the
effect of a particular synthesis parameter. The choice of a
terminal diamine ligand, for example, between 2,2′-bipyridine
or 1,10-phenanthroline, has additional structural conse-
quences because of the influence on aromatic/aromatic
interactions6 and was not varied in this study. The nature of
the transition metal in these systems is very important;9
therefore, all of our experiments in this work were limited
to nickel, which, compared to other divalent transition metals
under these conditions, has the least likely probability of
variations in its coordination geometry. In the present work,
the pH and temperature effects on the Ni(BDC)/2,2′-bipy
system have been further studied, and here we report the
syntheses and structures of three new Ni2+ coordination
compounds: one dimer, Ni2(BDC)(HBDC)2(2,2′-bipy)2 (2),
and two polymers, Ni3(BDC)3(2,2′-bipy)2 (3) and Ni(BDC)-
(2,2′-bipy)2‚2H2O (5).
Experimental Section
These diverse aspects of the structural chemistry of
polycarboxylate aromatic ligands are markedly sensitive to
synthesis conditions requiring a thorough systematic study
of the influence of each individual factor, such as the pH,
temperature, and solvent, on coordination modes and pro-
tonation states of these ligands. This information is especially
valuable because, once the conditions for the formation of a
specific building block are identified, it occasionally becomes
possible to expand the structure while preserving the
framework topology by increasing the ligand length and
generate “isoreticular” materials with much larger pores.7
Over the years of intensive studies of transition-metal mono-
and polycarboxylates, a vast amount of data have been
acquired, but systematic investigations focusing on the
influence of a particular synthesis parameter, while keeping
numerous other factors constant, are still very rare. For
example, two recent systematic studies of the effect of
temperature on the structure of cobalt succinates and divalent
transition-metal diglycolates and iminodiacetates clearly
illustrated the trend of an increase of the degree of condensa-
tion of metal polyhedra and an increase of the density of
carboxylic groups as a result of temperature increase.8 To
our knowledge, in the case of aromatic polycarboxylates,
however, no new studies of comparable scope have been
Materials and Methods. All of the reactants were reagent grade
and were used as purchased without further purification. The IR
spectra were measured on a Galaxy series FTIR 5000 spectrometer
with pressed KBr pellets. Thermal analyses were performed on a
thermogravimetric analysis V5.1A Du Pont 2100 instrument from
room temperature to 600 °C with a heating rate of 3 °C/min in air.
Synthesis. All compounds were prepared by a hydrothermal
reaction. A mixture of NiCl2‚6H2O (100 mg, 0.42 mmol), 1,4-
benzenedicarboxylic acid (69.9 mg, 0.42 mmol), KOH (0-118 mg,
0-2.1 mmol), 2,2′-bipyridine (65.7 mg, 0.42 mmol), and H2O (0.5
mL) was heated in a 23-mL stainless steel reactor with a Teflon
liner at 150-210 °C for 48 h. The crystals obtained were filtered
and washed with water and acetone (compounds 1-4) or with
ethanol and acetone (dark purple block-shaped compound 5).
Compound 5 decomposes slowly in water. The results from a series
of experiments are summarized in Figure 1. The diagram shows
the appearance of compounds 1-5 as a function of temperature
and the amount of KOH added. Optimized syntheses of compounds
2, 3, and 5 are given below.
Ni2(BDC)(HBDC)2(2,2′-bipy)2 (2). A mixture of NiCl2‚6H2O
(0.42 mmol, 100 mg), 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (0.42 mmol,
69.9 mg), KOH (0.84 mmol, 47.1 mg), 2,2′-bipyridine (0.42 mmol,
65.7 mg), and H2O (0.5 mL) was heated in a 23-mL stainless steel
reactor with a Teflon liner at 150 °C for 48 h. The green block-
shaped crystals were filtered and washed with water and acetone.
Yield: 45% based on Ni. Anal. Calcd for C44H15N4Ni2O12: C, 56.94;
H, 3.69; N, 6.04. Found: C, 56.88; H, 3.33; N, 5.99. IR (KBr):
3100.99m, 3070.13w, 1710.56s, 1606.56w, 1598.70w, 1585.20m,
1563.99w, 1515.78s, 1471.42w, 1407.78m (multiple), 1349.33w,
1313.29w, 1297.86w, 1226.51m, 1170.58w, 1153.28w, 1143.58w,
(5) Prior, T. J.; Rosseinsky, M. J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1222.
(6) Go, Y.; Wang, X.; Anokhina, E. V.; Jacobson, A. J. Inorg. Chem.
2004, 43, 5360.
(7) Yaghi, O. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.; Eddaoudi,
M.; Kim, J. Nature 2003, 423, 705.
(8) (a) Forster, P. M.; Burbank, A. R.; Livage, C.; Ferey, G.; Cheetham,
A. K. Chem. Commun. 2004, 368. (b) Forster, P. M.; Cheetham, A.
K. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2004, 73, 57.
(9) Sun, D.; Cao, R.; Liang, Y.; Shi, Q.; Su, W.; Hong, M. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 2335.
8266 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005