X-ray crystallography of product 10b. The diastereofacial
selectivity observed in these transformations must be caused
by the pyrrolidine ring acting as a chiral inductor through
complexation of its nitrogen to the organometallic during
the addition step.7
Encouraged by these results, we decided to expand the
scope of this transformation by using some heterocyclic and
functionalized cuprate reagents (Figure 2).
stoichiometric amount of sulfur in refluxing toluene5a,11 was
successful after 1-3 days of heating and provided good
Scheme 4. Aromatization of Dihydropyridines 10 with Sulfur
yields (59-93%) of 4-substituted nicotines 15 (Scheme 4,
Table 2).
Table 2. Aromatization of Dihydropyridines 10 with Sulfur
entrya
10
conditionsb
15
R
yield,c %
Figure 2. Organocopper nucleophiles used in the preparation of
10e-h.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10a reflux (32 h)
10b reflux (32 h)
10c reflux (32 h)
10d reflux (32 h)
10e reflux (3 d)
10f
10g act. C, reflux (2 d) 15g t-BuOCH2
10h 90 °C (1 d) 15h PhMe2Si
15a Me
15b Ph
15c n-Bu
15d Bn
15e 2-furanyl
15f
79
59
93
64
74
60
68
80
Synthesis of 4-furanyldihydronicotine 10e was achieved
in 77% yield by addition of cuprate 11 to 9 (entry 5). This
cuprate was prepared from lithiation of furan, followed by
addition of freshly made MgBr2 and transmetalation with
CuBr‚SMe2. A benzyloxymethyl group was introduced in
76% yield using higher order cuprate 12, formed from the
transmetalation of the corresponding stannane8 with n-BuLi
and addition of the Lipshutz reagent. Although the yield was
good, the addition resulted in the formation of a mixture of
diastereomers (10f) with a 52% de (entry 6).
Addition of cuprate 13, formed from deprotonation of tert-
butylmethyl ether with s-butyllithium and potassium tert-
butoxide followed by transmetalation with CuBr‚SMe,9 to 9
yielded 58% of product 10g as a single diastereomer along
with 40% of recovered starting material (entry 7).
reflux (3 d)
BnOCH2
a The reactions were generally performed on a 1-3.0 mmol scale in
toluene. b Sublimed sulfur (1.0 equiv) was used. c Yield of products obtained
from radial preparative-layer chromatography.
Aromatization of 4-n-butyl-1,4-dihydronicotine 10c was
achieved in an excellent yield of 93% (entry 3). A temper-
ature of only 90 °C was needed for 4-(dimethylphenylsilyl)-
dihydronicotine 10h (entry 8) to afford an 80% yield of 15h.
In the case of substrate 10g, addition of activated charcoal
was required to provide a 68% yield of the corresponding
nicotine derivative.
To verify that no racemization occurred during the
oxidation step, a method was developed to separate racemic
nicotine by chiral HPLC. All new 4-substituted nicotines
showed >99% ee using this method.
Finally, addition of (dimethylphenylsilyl)cuprate 14, pre-
pared from (dimethylphenylsilyl)magnesium bromide and
CuBr‚SMe2, gave a surprisingly high yield (81%) of 10h;10
however, the stereoselectivity was moderate, as two diaster-
eomers were isolated with a 68% dr (entry 8).
Once a regioselective method had been developed to
synthesize N-acyl-1,4-dihydronicotines, the next step was to
find a mild oxidation to afford 4-substituted nicotines 15.
Early attempts using p-chloranil, o-chloranil, or palladium
on carbon in toluene at reflux proved to be fruitless, as no
reaction occurred after 6 h in each case. The use of a
The analogue 4-(hydroxymethyl)nicotine (15i, R ) HOCH2)
was previously synthesized by Seeman12 as a byproduct (5%
yield) in the development of a ligand for radioimmunoassay
for tobacco alkaloids. Deprotection of the hydroxymethyl
group in compounds 15f and 15g would afford 4-(hy-
droxymethyl)nicotine. Various hydrogenation conditions
were attempted to cleave the benzyl group of 15f. Hydro-
genation using a catalytic amount of Pd/C in ethanol did
not yield any product, whereas use of Pearlman’s catalyst
as well as phase transfer catalysis13 resulted in opening of
the pyrrolidine ring.
(7) For related reactions using chiral auxiliaries, see: (a) Meyers, A. I.;
Oppenlaender, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1989. (b) Mangeney, P.;
Gosmini, R.; Raussou, S.; Commercon, M.; Alexakis, A. J. Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 1877. (c) Yamada, S.; Ichikawa, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
4231. (d) Yamada, S.; Morita, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8184 and
references therein.
(8) Kaufman, T. S. Synlett 1997, 1378.
(9) Corey, E. J.; Eckrich, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 3165.
(10) For related reactions, see: (a) Comins, D. L.; Killpack, M. O.;
Despagnet, E.; Zeller, E. Heterocycles 2002, 58, 505. (b) Comins, D. L.;
Killpack, M. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10, 972. (c) Ho¨sl, C. E.;
Wanner, K. T. Heterocycles 1998, 48, 2653
(11) Comins, D. L.; Stroud, E. D.; Herrick, J. J. Heterocycles 1984, 22,
151.
(12) Seeman, J. I.; Chavdarian, C. G.; Secor, H. V.; Osdene, T. S. J.
Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1548.
(13) Hanesina, S.; Liak, T. J.; Vanasse, B. Synthesis 1981, 397.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 22, 2005
5061