This research was supported by the National Science
Foundation (CHE-0315205) as well as by unrestricted grants from
Merck Research Laboratories and Eli Lilly & Co. The authors
thank Drs. Patricia S. Wilkinson and Robert Krull from Bruker
Biospin Corp. for their kind assistance in the NMR analysis of 1,
and Prof. Biard of the University of Nantes for a sample of natural
bistramide C.
Peter Wipf* and Tamara D. Hopkins
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA,
15260, USA. E-mail: pwipf@pitt.edu; Fax: +412-624-0787;
Tel: +412-624-8606
Scheme 4 (a) LiOH?H2O, EtOH, 0 uC to rt, 15 h; (b) TIPS-Cl, NEt3,
THF/DMF (1:1), 0 uC, 30 min, 82%; (c) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, THF, rt, 3.5 h;
(d) 3, PyBOP, NEt3, CH2Cl2, rt, 16 h; (e) TBAF (0.1 M), THF, 0 uC,
25 min, 86%; (f) 5, PPh3 (1.0 M in THF), H2O, THF (degassed), rt, 41 h;
then, 26, PyBOP, (iPr)2NEt, DMF, rt, 47 h, 58%; (g) PPTS, MeOH, rt,
48 h; (h) Dess–Martin periodinane (15 wt% in CH2Cl2), CH2Cl2, 0 uC to
rt, 1 h, 77%.
Notes and references
1 (a) D. Gouiffe`s, S. Moreau, N. Helbecque, J. L. Bernier, J. P. Henichart,
Y. Barbin, D. Laurent and J. F. Verbist, Tetrahedron, 1988, 44, 451; (b)
M. P. Foster, C. L. Mayne, R. Dunkel, R. J. Pugmire, D. M. Grant,
J.-M. Kornprobst, J.-F. Verbist, J.-F. Biard and C. M. Ireland, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 1110; (c) J.-F. Biard, C. Roussakis,
J.-M. Kornprobst, D. Gouiffes-Barbin, J.-F. Verbist, P. Cotelle,
M. P. Foster and C. M. Ireland, J. Nat. Prod., 1994, 57, 1336.
2 B. M. Degnan, C. J. Hawkins, M. F. Lavin, E. J. McCaffrey,
D. L. Parry and D. J. Watters, J. Med. Chem., 1989, 32,
1354–1359.
3 D. Riou, C. Roussakis, N. Robillard, J. F. Biard and J. F. Verbist, Biol.
Cell, 1993, 77, 261.
4 M. P. Sauviat, D. Gouiffes-Barbin, E. Ecault and J. F. Verbist, Biochim.
Biophys. Acta, 1992, 1103, 109.
5 M. R. Freya, O. Leontieva, D. J. Watters and J. D. Black, Biochem.
Pharm., 2001, 61, 1093.
6 (a) G. Zuber, M.-R. Goldsmith, P. Wipf and D. N. Beratan, 56th ACS
Southeast Regional Meeting, November 10–13, 2004; (b) S. Ribe,
R. K. Kondru, B. N. Beratan and P. Wipf, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,
122, 4608; (c) R. K. Kondru, P. Wipf and D. N. Beratan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1998, 120, 2204; (d) E. Giorgio, M. Roje, K. Tanaka, Z. Hamersak,
V. Sunjic, K. Nakanishi, C. Rosini and N. Berova, J. Org. Chem. ACS
ASAP, and references cited therein.
facile hydrolysis of the newly-formed amide bond in the coupling
product with 3 under a variety of ester saponification conditions.
Reduction of azide 25 under standard catalytic hydrogenation
conditions followed by a PyBOP-mediated condensation of the
resultant amine with acid 3 led to the desired C(13) amide. The
labile amino ester intermediate was submitted to the acylation
reaction without purification. Subsequent to a fluoride-induced
deprotection of the TIPS ester, carboxylic acid 26 was obtained in
an overall yield of 86%. Prior to the final segment coupling,
spiroketal azide 5 was treated with PPh3 in degassed THF at room
temperature. Upon the completion of the redox reaction, the
solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude amine was treated
with a DMF solution of 26, followed by PyBOP and Hu¨nig’s base.
The diamide product was isolated in a two step yield of 58%.
Global deprotection under mildly acidic conditions followed by
selective oxidation7 of the two allylic alcohols provided target
molecule 1. The overall yield of the longest linear sequence, 31
steps from triacetyl-D-glucal via spiroketal 5, was 0.03%. The
spectroscopic properties (1H and 13C NMR, CD, [a]D) of 1 were in
agreement with those obtained from an authentic sample of
(+)-bistramide C. Accordingly, our original assignment7 of the
stereochemistry of the natural product was confirmed.
7 P. Wipf, Y. Uto and S. Yoshimura, Chem. Eur. J., 2002, 8,
1670.
8 For related synthetic studies, see: (a) G. Solladie, C. Bauder and
J.-F. Biard, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 7747; (b) P. O. Gallagher, C. S.
P. McErlean, M. F. Jacobs, D. J. Watters and W. Kitching, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2002, 43, 531; (c) M. T. Crimmins and A. C. DeBaillie, 228th ACS
National Meeting, Philadelphia, August 22–26, 2004.
9 A. V. Statsuk, D. Liu and S. A. Kozmin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
9546.
10 (a) T. Novak, Z. Tan, B. Liang and E. Negishi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 2838; (b) P. Wipf and S. Ribe, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 1503; (c)
S. Ribe and P. Wipf, Chem. Commun., 2001, 299.
11 P. A. Evans, J. Cui, S. J. Gharpure and R. J. Hinkle, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 11456.
12 A. Rodriguez, M. Nomen, B. W. Spur and J. J. Godfroid, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1999, 40, 5161.
In conclusion, key methodology highlights of this total synthesis
are a MAO-mediated asymmetric methylalumination of a terminal
alkene,
a tandem bismuth(III)-initiated cyclization–allylation
for the formation of a 2,6-trans-substituted pyran, and a hyper-
valent iodine promoted remote functionalization–spiroketalization
reaction.
13 B. H. Lipshutz and T. R. Elworthy, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 1695.
14 S. G. Nelson, T. J. Peelen and Z. Wan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
9742.
15 (a) R. L. Dorta, A. Martin, J. A. Salazar, E. Suarez and T. Prange,
J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 2251; (b) S. J. Danishefsky, D. M. Armistead,
F. E. Wincott, H. G. Selnick and R. Hungate, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989,
111, 2967; (c) S. Rodriguez and P. Wipf, Synthesis, 2004, 2767.
16 C. A. Broka and J. Ehrler, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 5907.
17 D. A. Evans, M. D. Ennis and D. J. Mathre, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982,
104, 1737.
Total synthesis continues to play an important role in the
structure elucidation of natural products, in particular those
obtained from the marine environment or rare life forms.18 Both
synthesis and NMR methodology are significantly augmented by
the judicious use of chiroptical tools such as optical rotatory
dispersion (ORD) and circular dichroism (CD) that give direct
information about the absolute configuration of an analyte.6
18 (a) P. Wipf, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 2115; (b) K. C. Nicolaou and
S. A. Snyder, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1012.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 3421–3423 | 3423