Hua et al.
SCHEME 3. Attempted Epoxide Rearrangement to 6,7-ketol Steroid 16a
a Conditions: (a) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to room temperature; (b) BF3‚Et2O, CH2Cl2, rt.
SCHEME 4. Synthesis of 6-keto-7â-OH Steroid 16
of the 6,7-trans diol, we returned to the synthesis of the
natural product. From intermediate 11, the next task
would be that of introducing the C17 side chain with the
correct C17 and C20 stereochemistry. We sought to ac-
complish this subgoal through cuprate addition to a
structure of the type 25. Thus, treatment of 11 with acetic
acid led to removal of the C17 ketal with concomitant
cleavage of the C3 TBS silyl ether to afford 20 (Scheme
6). Fortunately, the C6 and C7 hydroxyl groups could be
engaged as an acetonide containing the isopropylidene
protecting group.
Wittig olefination of 21 proceeded with excellent
selectivity to afford the (Z)-17(20) ethylidene 22 in 66%
yield.10 The C3 hydroxy group was then reprotected as
the TBS ether, affording 23 in quantitative yield. The
latter compound was subjected to SeO2 catalyzed allylic
oxidation to give rise to 24, which, upon MnO2 oxidation,
afforded the geometrically defined enone intermediate 25.
(17E) and (17Z)-17(20)-en-16-one steroids are configura-
tionally unstable in solution.11 However, immediate
chromatographic purification of the crude compound on
silica gel column gave the desired (17E) steroid (25) as
the major product with no observed isomerization. Thus
purified, 25 is configurationally stable and can be stored
in the solid state.
Synthesis of the Side Chain and Conjugate Ad-
dition. Vinyl iodide 29, which would serve as the
coupling partner in the side chain installation, was
prepared in three steps from commercially available
ergosterol (26). Thus, acetylation of 26, followed by
ozonolysis, provided the (R)-2,3-dimethylbutanal 28 in
moderate yield (Scheme 7).12 Although this protocol for
the preparation of aldehyde 28 is hardly “atom economi-
cal,”13 the synthesis requires only two steps and uses
inexpensive starting materials (ergosterol: $126/25 g).
Aldehyde 28 was then converted to vinyl iodide 29
according to the Takai olefination protocol.14 Compared
to the same reaction of 3-methylbutanal,15 the E/Z ratio
of the vinyl iodide product was significantly improved
from 4:1 to 93:7. The boiling point of vinyl iodide 29 is
rather low (∼60 °C), which makes it impractical to
evaporate the solvent completely. Column chromatogra-
phy on 29 was performed with the low boiling solvent,
pentane, as the eluant, and the resultant product solution
was concentrated and could be stored as a pentane
with mCPBA to afford 15, wherein the allylic 7â-hydroxyl
group directed exclusive â-face epoidation of the molecule
(Scheme 3). We now hoped to effect a rearrangement to
the ketol 16; however, treatment of 15 with BF3‚Et2O led
only to decomposition.
Finally, we decided to attempt the direct selective
oxidation of the 6,7-diol, 11. We were encouraged by a
protocol developed by Krafft in their studies toward the
synthesis of xestobergsterol A9 which allowed exclusive
benzylation of 6R-OH in the presence of 7â-OH. Our
initial attempt, using PCC as the oxidizing agent, was
unsuccessful, leading only to recovery of the starting
material (Scheme 4). Treatment of 11 with silver carbon-
ate and Celite yielded a mixture of products. Gratifyingly,
however, the reaction of 11 with Dess-Martin periodi-
nane afforded a single ketol product, which we believed
to be the desired 16. Our provisional assignment was
based on a working hypothesis that an appropriate
oxidizing reagent would approach the hydroxyl group
only from the sterically less hindered R face, resulting
in the selective oxidation of the 6R-OH group.
To confirm the structure of 16, we prepared the 6R-
OH-7-keto steroid (19). Thus, selective benzoylation of
11 under Krafft’s conditions afforded the monobenzoy-
lated intermediate 17, as expected (Scheme 5). Oxidation
of the 7â-OH with Dess-Martin periodinane afforded 18,
which, upon deprotection, gave rise to the 6R-OH-7-keto
steroid 19. Comparison of the two ketol steroids, 19 and
1
16, by H NMR revealed two different compounds, thus
confirming that the product formed in the direct oxidation
was indeed the desired keto steroid 16. We could now be
confident that we had established suitable conditions for
the late-stage installation of the 6-keto-7â-OH function-
ality directly from the 6R,7â-diol.
(10) Konno, K.; Ojima, K.; Hayashi, T.; Takayama, H. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1992, 40, 1120-1124.
(11) Schmuff, N. R.; Trost, B. M. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1404-
1412.
Synthesis of ∆17(20)-16-one Steroid 25. Having
established, in principle, a means for late-stage oxidation
(12) Tsuda, K.; Kishida, Y.; Hayazu, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960,
82, 3396-3399.
(13) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259-281.
(14) Takai, K.; Nitta, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
7408-7410.
(9) Krafft, M. E.; Dasse, O. A.; Fu, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2475-
2485.
(15) Coleman, R. S.; Liu, P.-H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 577-580.
9852 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 24, 2005