C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Influence of Substituents on the Cyclization Pathway
Yields
entry
R
34
35
36
-
1
2
3
PhCH2CH2
Ph-
ClCH2
2%
46%
43%
37%
39%
-
68%
Figure 1. Proposed mechanism for the Mukaiyama-Michael cascade
cyclization leading to 7 and the Mukaiyama-Michael Prins cyclization
reaction leading to 28, which was not observed with substrates 1 and 5.
Mukaiyama-Michael Prins adduct 36. Both the Prins product and
cascade cyclization product were observed in the reactions of
different enol ethers with 2-cyclohexenone, but the outcome
responds to substrate modifications in a predictable manner.
We have discovered a new annulation reaction that leads to
complex tetrahydropyrans from very simple substrates. The
Mukaiyama-Michael cascade cyclization and the related Prins
cyclization will be useful new tools for the synthesis of complex
natural products.
Scheme 2. Mukaiyama-Michael Cascade Reaction Leads to
Inversion of Configuration but Retention of Optical Purity
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Institutes of Health
(CA-081635) for their financial support. Fellowship support was
provided to B.P. by the NIGMS (GM-68971) under the Minority
Opportunities Program.
between reactants 1 and 5, leading to zwitterion 25.4 Rapid
equilibration of 25 and 26 by way of a 2-oxonia-Cope rearrange-
ment5 sets up the final cyclization between the oxocarbenium ion
and the enolate in 27 to produce the tetrahydropyran 7.6 Bromo
tetrahydropyran 28 might be formed by Prins cyclization of the
initial Mukaiyama-Michael adduct 25, but it was not observed in
this case. We have demonstrated in model studies that the 2-oxonia-
Cope rearrangement is very rapid for oxocarbenium ions related
to 25.5j The proposed sequence is conceptually related to an oxonia-
Cope Prins sequence that we described recently.7 Unlike that
sequence, the current reaction was developed from a fortuitous
observation and involves very simple substrates.
The sequence from oxocarbenium ion 25 to 26 to 27 suggests
that the stereogenic center in the enol ether should be inverted in
the product. The observations in Scheme 2 demonstrate that this is
the case. A normal segment-coupling Prins cyclization of ester (R)-
30 leads to (S,S)-29, whereas the Mukaiyama-Michael cascade
reaction of enol (R)-1 leads to (R,R)-29 in high optical purity.
Substituted enones also can be employed, but the outcome is
more complicated. Table 2 outlines the reaction of several enol
ethers with 2-cyclohexenone. The phenethyl enol ether (entry 1)
reacts to give the expected cascade product 35 with high dia-
stereoselectivity along with significant amounts of the Mukaiyama-
Michael Prins adduct 36 (e.g., 28, Figure 1). Previous work has
demonstrated that the rate and equilibrium in 2-oxonia-Cope
rearrangements are strongly influenced by the electronic properties
of the R group.5f An R group favoring the rearranged oxocarbenium
ion (e.g., 26, Figure 1) would promote the cascade product, whereas
a substituent favoring the starting oxocarbenium ion (i.e., 25) would
favor Prins products. The phenyl substituent stabilizes the rearranged
oxocarbenium ion and leads to the diastereomeric cascade products
34 and 35 in good yield (entry 2). In contrast, chloromethyl
substituent (entry 3) inhibits Cope rearrangement5f and favors the
Supporting Information Available: Experimental data for the
synthesis and characterizations of the compounds described. This
References
(1) Cycloaddition Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Kobayashi, S., Jorgensen,
K. A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag: Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
(2) (a) Patterson, B.; Marumoto, S.; Rychnovsky, S. D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
3163-3166. (b) Patterson, B.; Rychnovsky, S. D. Synlett 2004, 543-
545.
(3) TiCl4 and 2,6-DTBMP also promote the reaction between 4 and 5 to give
6, but in reduced yield (53%). Stoichiometric TiBr4 was required for high
conversion. Both Ti(O-i-Pr)4 and TiF4 were ineffective.
(4) (a) Narasaka, K.; Soai, K.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1974, 1223-1224.
(b) Narasaka, K.; Soai, K.; Aikawa, Y.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1976, 49, 779-783. (c) Saigo, K.; Osaki, M.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem.
Lett. 1976, 163-164. (d) Heathcock, C. H.; Norman, M. H.; Uehling, D.
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 2797-2799. (e) Giuseppone, N.;
Courtaux, Y.; Collin, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7845-7848. (f) Evans,
D. A.; Rovis, T.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Tedrow, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 1994-1995. (g) Paulsen, H.; Antons, S.; Brandes, A.; Logers,
M.; Muller, S. N.; Naab, P.; Schmeck, C.; Schneider, S.; Stoltefuss, J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3373-3375. (h) Jaber, N.; Assie, M.;
Fiaud, J.-C.; Collin, J. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 3075-3083.
(5) (a) Lolkema, L. D. M.; Semeyn, C.; Ashek, L.; Hiemstra, H.; Speckamp,
W. N. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 7129-7140. (b) Nokami, J.; Yoshizane,
K.; Matsuura, H.; Sumida, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6609-6610.
(c) Roush, W. R.; Dilley, G. J. Synlett 2001, 955-959. (d) Loh, T.-P.;
Hu, Q.-Y.; Ma, L.-T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2450-2451. (e) Alder,
R. W.; Harvey, J. N.; Oakley, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4960-
4961. (f) Crosby, S. R.; Harding, J. R.; King, C. D.; Parker, G. D.; Willis,
C. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 577-580. (g) Loh, T.-P.; Hu, Q.-Y.; Ma, L.-T.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2389-2391. (h) Hussain, I.; Komasaka, T.; Ohga,
M.; Nokami, J. Synlett 2002, 640-642. (i) Nokami, J.; Nomiyama, K.;
Matsuda, S.; Imai, N.; Kataoka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
1273-1276. (j) Jasti, R.; Anderson, C. D.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9939-9945.
(6) Pastine, S. J.; McQuaid, K. M.; Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
12180-12181.
(7) (a) Dalgard, J. E.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
15662-15663. (b) Dalgard, J. E.; Rychnovsky, S. D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
1589-1591.
JA056483U
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 46, 2005 16045