J. M. Betancort et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4437–4440
4439
The substituted cyanothiazolidines 18–28 were evaluated for
Acknowledgements
DPP4 inhibitory activity by a fluorescence assay using Gly-Pro-
AMC as substrate.17 Inhibitors were also assayed for their selec-
tivity profiles against a variety of DPP4 homologues including
quiescent prolyl peptidase (QPP/DPPII/DPP7), DPP8 and DPP9
(Table 1).18
The authors would like to thank Drs. Michael Hepperle and
Marie O’Farrell for reviewing the manuscript.
References and notes
The substituted cyanothiazolidines exhibited potencies against
DPP4 ranging from moderate to good in the double digit nanomo-
lar range, with the phenyl substituted compound 18 displaying the
best potency at 26 nM. Selectivity profiles against the homologous
proteases were clearly modulated by the substitution present on
the lactam ring, with small alkyl groups simultaneously displaying
improved selectivities against DPP7 and DPP8. In general, the
cyanothiazolidines show the least selectivity against DPP9. This
is also the case for other cyanopyrrolidines described in the litera-
ture such as LAF-237 (2) and BMS-477118 (3). Larger substituents
on the lactam ring show decreased selectivity against DPP9. In fact,
compounds 25–27 exhibit greater potency against DPP9 than
DPP4. Though the X-ray structure of DPP9 is not available, detailed
homology models have recently been established to rationalize the
selectivity of known inhibitors against DPP4, DPP8 and DPP9.19
These studies show that the P2 pocket of DPP9 is larger than that
on DPP4. The SAR presented here for the cyanothiazolidines rein-
forces that observation. The phenyl substituted analog 18 shows
the best balance of potency and selectivity within this series. But
even small changes such as the introduction of a halogen substitu-
tion (compound 28) on the aromatic ring have a negative impact
on the overall profile of the compound.
1. (a) Ross, S. A.; Gulve, E. A.; Wang, M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1255; (b) Patel, M.;
Rybczynski, P. Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2003, 12, 623.
2. (a) Arulmozhi, D. K.; Portha, B. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 28, 96; (b) Knudsen, L. B.
J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4128; (c) Orsakov, C. Diabetologia 1992, 35, 701.
3. (a) Augustyns, K.; Van der Veken, P.; Senten, K.; Haemers, A. Curr. Med. Chem.
2005, 12, 971; (b) Weber, A. E. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4135; (c) Drucker, D. J.
Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2003, 12, 87; (d) Pospisilik, A.; Martin, J.; Doty, T.; Ehses,
J. A.; Pamir, N.; Lynn, F. C.; Piteau, S.; Demuth, H.-U.; McIntosh, C. H. S.;
Pederson, R. A. Diabetes 2003, 52, 741.
4. (a) Herman, G. A.; Bergman, A.; Stevens, C.; Kotey, P.; Yi, B. M.; Zhao, P.;
Dietrich, B.; Golor, G.; Schroedter, A.; Keymeulen, B.; Lasseter, K. C.; Kipnes, M.
S.; Snyder, K.; Hilliard, D.; Tanen, M.; Cilissen, C.; De Smet, M.; Lepeleire, I.; Van
Dyck, K.; Wang, A. Q.; Zeng, W.; Davies, M. J.; Tanaka, W.; Holst, J. J.; Deacon, C.
F.; Gottesdiener, K. M.; Wagner, J. A. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 91, 4612;
(b) Ahren, B.; Pacini, G.; Foley, J. E.; Schweizer, A. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1936.
5. Thornberry, N. A.; Weber, A. E. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 557.
6. (a) Peters, J.-U. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 579; (b) Madar, D. J.; Kopecka, H.;
Pireh, D.; Yong, H.; Pei, Z.; Li, X.; Wiedeman, P. E.; Djuric, S. W.; Von Geldern, T.
W.; Fickes, M. G.; Bhagavatula, L.; McDermott, T.; Wittenberger, S.; Richards, S.
J.; Longenecker, K. L.; Stewart, K. D.; Lubben, T. H.; Ballaron, S. J.; Stashko, M. A.;
Long, M. A.; Wells, H.; Zinker, B. A.; Mika, Am. K.; Beno, D. W. A.; Kempf-Grote,
A. J.; Polakowski, J.; Segreti, J.; Reinhart, G. A.; Fryer, R. M.; Sham, H. L.;
Trevillyan, J. M. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6416; (c) Augeri, D. J.; Robl, J. A.;
Betebenner, D. A.; Magnin, D. R.; Khanna, A.; Robertson, J. G.; Wang, A.;
Simpkins, L. M.; Taunk, P.; Huang, Q.; Han, S.-P.; Abboa-Offei, B.; Cap, M.; Xin,
L.; Tao, L.; Tozzo, E.; Welzel, G. E.; Egan, D. M.; Marcinkeviciene, J.; Chang, S. Y.;
Biller, S. A.; Kirby, M. S.; Parker, R. A.; Hamann, L. G. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48,
5025; (d) Villhauer, E. B.; Brinkman, J. A.; Naderi, G. B.; Burkey, B. F.; Dunning,
B. E.; Prasad, K.; Mangold, B. L.; Russell, M. E.; Hughes, T. E. J. Med. Chem. 2003,
46, 2774.
Although compounds 18–28 display different degrees of activ-
ity against the other proteases in the DPP family, they did not
exhibit significant inhibition against fibroblast activation protein
7. See for example Ref. 6d and Sakashita, H.; Akahoshi, F.; Kitajima, H.;
Tsutsumiuchi, R.; Hayashi, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 3662.
(FAP) (IC50 >10 lM), another proline-specific enzyme.
8. (a) Oefner, C.; D’Arcy, A.; Sweeney, A. M.; Pierau, S.; Gardiner, R.; Dale, G. E. Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. D 2003, 59, 1206; (b) Rasmussen, H. B.; Branner, S.; Wiberg, F.
C.; Wagtmann, N. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 19.
9. Campbell, D. A.; Betancort, J. M.; Winn, D. T. U.S. Patent Application 06/
009518A1.
10. Heins, J.; Welker, P.; Schonlein, C.; Born, I.; Hartrodt, B.; Neubert, K.; Tsuru, D.;
Barth, A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1988, 954, 161.
11. Baldwin, J. E.; Freeman, R. T.; Lowe, C.; Schofield, C. J.; Lee, E. Tetrahedron 1989,45, 4537.
12. Compound 6 was prepared from Fmoc-BTD purchased from Neosystems (Cat.
No. FB02601).
In summary, a novel series of bicyclic cyanothiazolidine inhibi-
tors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 has been developed.20 The constrained
inhibitors were designed to avoid the formation of inactive cyclic
amidine species. They show good to moderate biochemical potency
and depending on their substitution exhibitdifferent selectivity pro-
files against closely related serine proteases. The incorporation of a
phenyl group in the P-2 amino acid provides the greatest potency
13. The amine and cyano groups adopt a relative spatial arrangement similar to the
one observed in the X-ray co-crystal structure of BMS-477118 (Saxagliptin, 3)
complexed with DPP4 Metzler, W. J.; Yanchunas, J.; Weigelt, C.; Kish, K.; Klei, H.
E.; Xie, D.; Zhang, Y.; Corbett, M.; Tamura, J. K.; He, B.; Hamann, L. G.; Kirby, M.
S.; Marcinkeviciene, J. Protein Sci. 2008, 17, 412.
combined with increased selectivity. While substitutionin the a-po-
sition of the P-2 amino acid is well tolerated, N-alkylation had a
negative effect on potency.
Table 1
14. Szardenings, A. K.; Burkoth, T. S.; Look, G. C.; Campbell, D. A. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 6720.
DPP4 inhibition and selectivity profile of substituted bicyclic cyanothiazolidines
15. Fuchi, N.; Doi, T.; Harada, T.; Urban, J.; Cao, B.; Kahn, M.; Takahashi, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1305.
16. Extensive NOE studies were carried out in conjunction with X-ray structure
determination of a key intermediate in order to assign the stereochemistry.
See: Liu, R.; Wu, Y.; Li, Q.; Liao, W.; Chen, S.-H.; Li, G.; Betancort, J. M.; Winn, D.
T.; Campbell, D. A. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4363.
O
CN
N
H
R
HCl.H2N
S
17. The reported IC50 values are an average of at least two replicates. Human DPP4
was purchased from Research Diagnostics, Inc., Concord, MA. The full length
cDNAs for human DPP family members DPP7, DPP8, DPP9, and fibroblast
activation protein (FAP) were obtained from Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL.
The cDNAs were cloned into the pFastBac vector with the addition of an N-
terminal FLAG tag on DPP7, C-terminal 6xHis tags on DPP8 and DPP9, and an
N-terminal 6xHis tag on FAP. Baculovirus was prepared using the Bac-to-Bac
Baculovirus Expression System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The cDNAs in the
final baculovirus constructs were sequence verified. S9 insect cells (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) were grown to mid-log phase at 27 °C with shaking at 125 rpm
and then adjusted to 2 x 10E6/ml just prior to infection with DPP7, DPP8, DPP9,
and FAP baculoviral stocks at an MOI of 4. The infected cells were grown for
48 h and the cell pellets harvested and frozen until purification. DPP7 was
purified using anti-FLAG immunoaffinity gel (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) according
to the manufacturer’s instructions. DPP8, DPP9, and FAP were purified using a
B-PER 6xHis Fusion Protein Column Purification Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Test
compounds were dissolved in DMSO or in 50 mM glycine buffer (pH 3.0).
Recombinant human DPPs were incubated with inhibitor at concentrations of
Compounds
R
DPP4 IC50 nM
DPP7 SIa
DPP8 SIa
DPP9 SIa
2b
3b
7
3
3
105
26
56
33
63
53
109
89
59
>16,000
>3333
>476
101
129
277
6
835
114
40
100
30
31
23
15
41
7
13
22
3
10
3
4
2
3
36
1
H
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ph
Et
iPr
iBu
sBu(S)
Bn
59
23
32
35
3
1
17
Cp
Cy
BnCH2
CyCH2
4-FPh
4
5
6
44
0.5
0.2
0.4
4
205
118
152
0.5 nM to 50
lM in reaction buffer at 27 °C for 10 min before addition of
a
substrates Gly-Pro AMC (7-amido-4-methylcoumarin) for DPP4, Lys-Pro AMC
for DPP7, and Ala-Pro AMC for DPP8, DPP9 and FAP. Cleavage of AMC was
monitored using an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an emission
Selectivity Index (SI) determined by dividing enzyme IC50 by DPP4 IC50
.
b
Data generated in our laboratories. Though absolute numbers differ from
published data, the relative selectivity and ranking order is the same.