SCHEME 1. Synthesis and Reductive Opening of PSP
Acetal 3
p-Siletanylbenzylidene Acetal: Oxidizable
Protecting Group for Diols
Sarah E. House, Kevin W. C. Poon, Hubert Lam, and
Gregory B. Dudley*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State
UniVersity, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4390
ReceiVed September 26, 2005
efficient glycosylations yet cleave under mild and mutually
compatible conditions.
The p-siletanylbenzyl (PSB) ether fulfills the criteria neces-
sary to meet this demand.2 It is electronically similar to the
benzyl ether and stable to the DDQ-promoted removal of the
p-methoxybenzyl group, yet treatment with hydrogen peroxide
or tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) under Tamao-type condi-
tions7 triggers its cleavage. However, siletanes succumb to ring-
opening reactions in the presence of hard nucleophiles such as
alkyllithiums and potassium or sodium alkoxides.8 Silver oxide-
promoted arylmethylation reactions do not affect the siletane
functionality; this provides a convenient method for the forma-
tion of PSB ethers from primary alcohols, but secondary alcohols
reacted sluggishly in our initial study. We therefore became
interested in alternative methods for preparing PSB ethers from
secondary alcohols.
Hydrogen peroxide oxidation of benzylidene acetals (and
derivative benzyl ethers) that incorporate a siletane ring at
the para position creates a deprotection pathway without
affecting other important chemical properties of the ben-
zylidene acetal, such as regioselective reductive ring opening.
Herein we describe the synthesis and utility of p-siletanyl-
benzylidene acetal 1, which presents one option for introducing
PSB ethers onto secondary alcohols in a manner consistent with
many synthetic efforts. In a broader context, the p-siletanyl-
phenyl (PSP)-substituted acetals provide an attractive comple-
ment to other alkylidene acetal PGs for the unique cleavage
pathway enabled by peroxide oxidation of the arylsiletane
moiety. Thus, in the course of developing PSP-substituted
acetals as precursors to PSB ethers, we were also interested in
(1) verifying that the chemistry of arylsiletane-derived acetals
(e.g., 3) is grossly analogous to other widely studied benzylidene
acetals and (2) highlighting the primary difference in chemical
reactivity, which is the ability to oxidize the arylsiletane moiety
to the corresponding phenol with hydrogen peroxide. In this
Note we report the results of our studies aimed at addressing
these points, and we submit the p-siletanylbenzylidene acetal
(1) as a novel reagent for the protection of diols.
Our recent finding1 that alkyl- and arylsiletanes are oxidized
to the corresponding alcohols with alkaline peroxide under mild
conditions prompted a follow-up study, in which the p-
siletanylbenzyl (PSB) ether was designed and tested as a
protecting group (PG) for alcohols and phenols.2 Protecting
group manipulations play a key role in organic synthesis.3 We
envision particular applications of the PSB group in carbohy-
drate synthesis.4
Arylmethyl ether PGs are routinely employed in glycosyla-
tions due to their tolerance of acidic reaction conditions and to
exploit their increased reactivity relative to acyl-protected
glycosyl donors.5 Frequently the spectator hydroxyl groups
require differential protection; for such cases there is a demand
for diverse arylmethyl (modified benzyl) PGs6 that support
The para-siletanylbenzylidene acetal undergoes reductive ring
opening upon treatment with diisobutylaluminum hydride
(DIBAL-H) to afford the more substituted PSB ether. We
examined the protection of 1,3-butanediol and subsequent
reductive ring opening of benzylidene acetal 3 (Scheme 1).
Simple acetal formation occurred quantitatively with use of
catalytic camphorsulfonic acid (CSA) in refluxing methylene
chloride. Note the arylsiletane stability to acidic conditions.
Subsequent treatment with DIBAL-H9 afforded 4 in nearly
quantitative yield; the overall yield for the two-step sequence
(1) Sunderhaus, J. D.; Lam, H.; Dudley, G. B. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4571-
4573.
(2) Lam, H.; House, S. E.; Dudley, G. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
3283-3285.
(3) (a) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. ProtectiVe Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1999. (b) Kocienski,
P. J. Protecting Groups, 3rd ed.; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2003.
(4) PreparatiVe Carbohydrate Chemistry; Hanessian, S., Ed.; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1997.
(5) The armed/disarmed tactic for glycoside coupling takes advantage
of this reactivity difference. (a) Mootoo, D. R.; Konradsson, P.; Udodong,
U.; Fraser-Reid, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5583-5584. (b) Paulsen;
H.; Richter, A.; Sinnwell, V.; Stenzel, W. Carbohydr. Res. 1978, 64, 339-
362.
(6) For recent arylmethyl PGs that were developed within the context
of carbohydrate synthesis, see: (a) Jobron, L.; Hindsgaul, O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 5835-5836. (b) Plante, O.; Buchwald, S. L.; Seeberger, P.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7148-7149.
(7) Tamao, K.; Ishida, N.; Ito, Y.; Kumada, M. Org. Synth. 1990, 69,
96-105.
(8) Sheikh, R. K.; Tharanikkarasu, K.; Imae, I.; Kawakami, Y. Macro-
molecules 2001, 34, 4384-4389.
10.1021/jo052015r CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/19/2005
420
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 420-422