5220
CF3
X. Zheng et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 5217–5221
moderately high clearance and relatively long half lives
due to a large volume of distribution.
CF3
Cl
a
+
N
(HO)2B
N
Although 70 was not demonstrably better in terms of its
aqueous solubility (HTSol = BLQ), oral pharmacoki-
netics experiments revealed that 70 significantly outper-
formed 1 with respect to oral bioavailability (99 and
27%, respectively). The lower clearance exhibited by 70
is partially responsible for this improvement in oral
exposure, however, factors such as increased rigidity
and/or fewer rotatable bonds may also contribute.9
71
72
73
b, c
CO2H
NH2
CO2H
NO2
CF3
CF3
d
N
N
In conclusion, bioisosteric replacement of the piperazine
of the urea lead 1 led to the biarylamide series. The
improved VR1 potency of biarylamide analogs with
hydrogen bond donors at the 3-position of the B-ring
suggested that enforcing planarity of the benzamide unit
through interaction with the carbonyl group was a
promising approach. To investigate this possibility the
conformationally constrained analog (70) was prepared.
Aminoquinazoline 70 represents a novel VR1 antagonist
template with improved in vitro potency and oral bio-
availability relative to the corresponding urea or carbox-
amide series compound. While the aminoquinazoline
template retains all the pharmacophore features of the
arylureas and biarylamides, the new template also pro-
vides additional handles for further optimization. Fur-
ther exploration of the SAR and biology of the
aminoquinazoline series will be reported in due course.
75
74
e, f
CF3
Cl
N
N
HN
N
g
CF3
CF3
N
N
N
70
76
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) 2 M Na2CO3, Pd(PPh3)4,
DME, 80 °C, 83%; (b) HNO3, 0 °C, 100%; (c) KMnO4, pyridine, H2O,
63%; (d) H2, Pd/C, 92%; (e) HCONH2, 63%; (f) OPCl3, 72%; (g)
4-trifluoromethyl aniline, IPA, 94%.
significantly less potent at VR1. Therefore, although it is
possible to achieve planarity via intramolecular H-bond-
ing of 3-substituents with either the carboxamide N–H
or the carbonyl oxygen, the data in Table 3 suggest that
the latter is preferred from a binding energy perspective.
The reasons for this are not clear but could be due to
severe spatial constraints near the amide N–H.
Acknowledgment
The authors express their appreciation to Lauren Dan-
ner for her work in cell culture and also to Bert Chenard
and Dave Wustrow for reviewing the manuscript.
Incorporation of hetero-atoms into the B-ring was also
examined (e.g., 64, 68, and 69) and led to a diminution
in VR1 potency.
References and notes
To investigate the notion that rigidifying the B-ring ori-
entation through hydrogen bonding interaction with the
carbonyl group (as in 55, Fig. 2) is a promising approach
to enhance VR1 potency, we synthesized the conforma-
tionally constrained biarylamide 70 (Scheme 2, Fig. 2).
The resulting quinazoline (70, hVR1 = 1.1 nM) was 10-
fold more potent in the human VR1 FLIPR assay than
either the parent urea 1 (17 nM) or the parent carbox-
amide 2 (14 nM). As with compounds 1 and 2, 70 was
devoid of agonist activity (HEK 293 cells expressing
human VR1) at concentrations up to 4 lM.
1. (a) Krause, J. E.; Chenard, B. L.; Cortright, D. N. Curr.
Opin. Invest. Drugs 2005, 6, 48; (b) Rami, H. K.;
Gunthorpe, M. J. Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic
´
´
Strategies 2004, 1, 97; (c) Lopez-Rodrıguez, M. L.; Viso,
A.; Ortega-Gutierrez, S. Mini-Rev Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 729.
´
2. (a) Hutchison, A.; DeSimone, R. W.; Hodgetts, K.; Krause,
J. E.; White, G. PCT WO 02/08221; (b) Bakthavatchalam,
R.; Hutchison, A.; DeSimone, R. W.; Hodgetts, K.;
Krause, J. E.; White, G. U.S. Patent 6,723,730, 2004.
3. (a) Sun, Q.; Tafesse, L.; Islam, K.; Zhou, X.; Victory, S. F.;
Zhang, C.; Hachicha, M.; Schmid, L. A.; Patel, A.;
Rotshteyn, Y.; Valenzano, K. J.; Kyle, D. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 3611; (b) Tafesse, L.; Sun, Q.;
Schmid, L.; Valenzano, K. J.; Rotshteyn, Y.; Su, X.; Kyle,
D. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 5513; (c) Swanson,
D. M.; Dubin, A. E.; Shah, C.; Nasser, N.; Chang, L.; Dax,
S. L.; Jetter, M.; Breitenbrucher, J. G.; Codd, E. E.; Lee, D.
H.; Zhang, S.-P.; Chaplan, S. R.; Carruthers, N. I. J. Med.
Chem. 2005, 48, 1857.
4. (a) Valenzano, K. J.; Grant, E. R.; Wu, G.; Hachicha, M.;
Schmid, L.; Tafesse, L.; Sun, Q.; Rotshteyn, Y.; Francis, J.;
Limberis, J.; Malik, S.; Whittemore, E. R.; Hodges, D.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 306, 377; (b) Pomonis, J. D.;
Harrison, J. E.; Lilly, M.; Bristol, D. R.; Valenzano, K. J.;
Walker, K. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 306, 387.
The rat pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the arylurea 1
and the aminoquinazoline 70 are compared in Table 4.
Similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed for 1
and 70 following intravenous (iv) dosing at 3 mg/kg in
67% PEG/water vehicle. Both compounds exhibited
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic profiles of 1 and 70
Compound
T1/2
CL
(mL/min/kg)
Vd
Tmax
F
(%)
(h)
(L/kg)
(h)
1
70
7.2
8.1
39
23
12
12.5
0.5
0.7
27
99