M. Rakse et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 70 (2013) 469e476
475
d
(ppm): 12.447 (s,1H, COOH), 9.742 (s,1H, NHCO), 8.083 (s, 1H, Are
CH), 7.1e8.0 (m, 6H, AreCH), 4.302 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.272 (s, 3H, CH3).
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6)
17.3, 38.2,109.6,125.5,125.9,127.2,
DMSO-d6) d 17.3, 38.4, 56.4, 61.0, 104.3, 109.6, 120.6, 124.9, 125.4,
129.3, 135.6, 137.8, 139.3, 152.8, 164.3, 166.3, 167.2, 168.2. MS (ESI)
m/z: 457.6 (M ꢀ H).
d
127.8, 129.6, 129.9, 131.5, 134.5, 136.5, 137.2, 138.4, 166.2, 166.5,
167.3, 168.3. MS (ESI) m/z: 401.6 (M ꢀ H).
4.2. In vitro PTP1B enzyme inhibition
4.1.6.3. 3-(2-(5-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio)acet-
amido)-4-methylbenzoic acid, 15c. Yield 80.01%, Mp 257.5 ꢁC. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) 1691.46 (CO st. of COOH), 3226.69 (OH st. of COOH),
2995.25 (CH3 st.), 1643.46 (amide CO st.), 761.83 (CeS st.), 3461.99
(NH st.), 3082.04 (Ar CeH st.), 1596.95 (Ar CeC st.), 1033.17 (Cl st.).
PTP1B enzyme inhibitory activity was determined by using the
colorimetric, non-radioactive assay (PTP1B assay kit, BML-AK 822,
Enzo life sciences, USA). The test compounds on PTP1B enzyme
activity were studied by incubating these with human recombinant
PTP1B enzyme and determined the PTP1B activity using phosphate
detection reagent, Biomol red. The reaction was carried out in 96
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 10.7706 (s, 1H, NHCO)),
7.9819 (d, 2H, AreCH, J ¼ 7.92 Hz), 7.4715 (m, 4H, AreCH), 4.1909 (s,
2H, CH2), 2.33374 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6)
17.8,
well, flat-bottomed microtiter plates at 10 mM concentration using
d
DMSO as control. Further, those compounds show around 50% in-
hibitions were tested at six different concentrations for the calcu-
lation of IC50 values. The detection of free phosphate released is
based on classic Malachite green assay [32]. The percentage inhi-
bition by test compounds on PTP1B enzyme was calculated based
on the activity in the control tube (without inhibitor) as 100% from
three independent sets of experiments.
38.3, 109.4, 125.4, 125.9, 127.4, 127.8, 129.6, 130.4, 131.5, 134.6, 136.8,
137.4, 138.6, 166.3, 166.6, 167.3, 168.3. MS (ESI) m/z: 437.8 (M ꢀ H).
4.1.6.4. 3-(2-(5-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio)acet-
amido)-4-methylbenzoic acid, 15d. Yield 60.36%, Mp 257.5 ꢁC. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) 1689.53 (CO st. of COOH), 3228.62 (OH st. of COOH),
2923.88 (CH3 st.), 1645.17 (amide CO st.), 752.19 (CeS st.), 3382.91
(NH st.), 3072.39 (Ar CeH st.), 1552.59 (Ar CeC st.), 1356.51 (OH st.).
4.3. Evaluation of in vivo toxicity using zebrafish embryos
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 11.7969 (s broad peak, 1H,
OH), 10.9380 (s, 1H, NHCO), 7.9758 (d, 1H, AreCH, J ¼ 7.88 Hz),
7.9082 (d, 1H, AreCH, J ¼ 1.64 Hz), 7.8378 (d, 1H, AreCH,
J ¼ 4.58 Hz), 7.4771 (d, 1H, AreCH, J ¼ 8.04 Hz), 7.3481 (m, 1H, Are
CH), 6.9293 (d, 1H, AreCH, J ¼ 8.12 Hz), 6.8748 (t, 1H, AreCH,
J ¼ 7.72 Hz), 4.2406 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.3359 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR
All procedures using zebrafish were in accordance with ethical
guidelines for animal use and followed those published by the NIH.
An indigenous wild type adult zebrafish strain from India was used
for this study (obtained from Vikrant Aquaculture, Mumbai, India).
They were maintained in a recirculation system using purified ELIX
System (Millipore, Billerica, US) grade water containing 200 mg/l
sea salt at 28 ꢁC under a 14:10 h light and dark cycle. Fish were fed
three times daily with a combination of freshly hatched live brine
shrimp and dry food. Males and females were kept in separate
tanks for four days before they were allowed to spawn. On day five,
300e400 embryos were obtained by natural mating of both adult
sexes (3:2 female and male ratios) in a breeding tank setup. Em-
bryos were collected and raised in 60 mm Petri dishes containing
E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, and 0.33 mM
MgSO4) for 24 h. Compound stock was diluted in E3 medium to
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d 17.3, 38.4, 109.6, 118.2, 121.8, 125.5, 125.3,
126.5,129.2,129.9,131.5,136.4,137.2,155.3,166.1,166.3,167.1,168.5.
MS (ESI) m/z: 383.8 (M ꢀ H).
4.1.6.5. 3-(2-(5-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio)acet-
amido)-4-methylbenzoic acid, 15e. Yield 59.05%, Mp 230.5 ꢁC. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) 1695.31 (CO st. of COOH), 3272.98 (OH st. of COOH),
2829.38 (CH3 st.), 1662.52 (amide CO st.), 763.76 (CeS st.), 3385.42
(NH st.), 3028.03 (Ar CeH st.), 1581.52 (Ar CeC st.), 1374.15 (OH st.).
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 8.4369 (d, 1H, AreCH,
J ¼ 1.52 Hz), 7.7174 (d, 1H, AreCH, J ¼ 7.84 Hz), 7.3674 (d, 2H, Are
CH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 7.3211 (d, 1H, AreCH, J ¼ 7.88 Hz), 7.1962 (m, 1H,
AreCH), 7.1050 (m, 1H, AreCH), 4.1379 (s, 1H, CH2), 2.4161 (s, 3H,
obtain final concentrations of 10
bryos at 24 h post fertilization were dechorionated with 500
Pronase K for 10 min. Six embryos per well were placed in 24-well
plates containing E3 medium and compounds added to a final
m
M in 0.1% DMSO. Zebrafish em-
mg/ml,
CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d
17.3, 38.4, 109.6, 116.6, 116.8,
118.8, 125.3, 125.9, 129.2, 136.7, 137.3, 158.3, 166.4, 166.6, 167.1,
concentration of 10 mM (in 0.1% DMSO). The embryos were grown
168.5. MS (ESI) m/z: 383.6 (M ꢀ H).
in the presence of the compound for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Control
embryos were incubated in 0.1% DMSO. Finally, embryos were
observed using visible light microscopy at regular intervals after
compound treatment to document general toxicity-related effects.
4.1.6.6. 4-Methyl-3-(2-(5-p-tolyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio)acꢀe1t-
amido)benzoic acid, 15f. Yield 89.03%, Mp 246 ꢁC. IR (KBr, cm
)
1693.88 (CO st. of COOH), 3220.90 (OH st. of COOH), 2999.10 (CH3
st.), 1645.17 (amide CO st.), 754.12 (CeS st.), 3542.99 (NH st.),
1539.09 (Ar CeC st.), 1741 (C6H5CH3 st.).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-
4.4. Molecular modelling
d6)
d
(ppm): 10.597 (s, 1H, NHCO), 7.0e8.0 (m, 7H, AreCH), 4.102 (s,
17.3,
For better understanding of binding mode of substituted 3-
acetamido-4-methyl benzoic acid derivatives at the molecular
level, we carried out molecular docking simulations of synthesized
molecules (10aee and 15aeg) at the PTP1B catalytic ligand binding
site. The docking simulations of synthesized compounds (10aee
and 15aeg) were performed using Maestro, version 9.2 imple-
mented from Schrodinger software suite [33]. The ligands were
sketched in 3D format using build panel and were prepared for
docking using ligprep application. The protein for docking study
was taken from Protein data bank (PDB ID: 1XBO) and prepared by
removing solvent, adding hydrogen and further minimization in
the presence of bound ligand (IX1) using protein preparation
wizard. Grids for molecular docking were generated with bound
co-crystallized ligand. For the validation of docking parameters the
co-crystal ligand (IX1) was re-docked at the catalytic site of protein
2H, CH2), 2.329 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d
21.7, 38.4, 109.6, 123.1, 125.3, 125.8, 126.7, 127.8, 129.2, 131.9, 136.7,
137.3, 164.4, 166.6, 167.1, 168.8. MS (ESI) m/z: 381.8 (M ꢀ H).
4.1.6.7. 4-Methyl-3-(2-(5-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-
2-ylthio)acetamido) benzoic acid, 15g. Yield 54.70%, Mp 163.5 ꢁC. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) 1718.46 (CO st. of COOH), 3311.55 (OH st. of COOH),
2945.10 (CH3 st.), 1654.81 (amide CO st.), 751.03 (CeS st.), 3496.70
(NH st.), 1589.23 (Ar CeC st.), 1128.28 (OCH3 st.). 1H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 10.7274 (s broad peak, 1H, COOH), 9.7648 (s,
1H, NHCO), 8.0864 (s, 1H, AreCH), 7.8527 (s, 1H, AreCH), 7.6501 (d,
1H, AreCH, J ¼ 7.48 Hz), 7.4099 (d, 1H, AreCH, J ¼ 8.04 Hz), 7.2233
(d,1H, AreCH, J ¼ 7.92 Hz), 4.2744 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.8046 (s, 6H, OCH3),
3.7720 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.2754 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz,