A R T I C L E S
Zheng et al.
Table 1. Electrochemical Potentials (V vs [FeCp2]+/0), with
Found: C, 39.09; H, 2.96; N, 2.19. UV-vis-NIR (CH2Cl2,
generated in situ) λmax (ꢀmax) 900 (129 000) nm (M-1cm-1). IR
(KBr) ν 1602 (s), 1587 (s, br), 1498, 1460, 1438, 1307, 1262
(s, br), 1191 (w), 1158 (s), 1116, 1020, 925 (w), 834, 804, 647,
Relative Peak Heights in Parentheses, for Compounds 1 and 2 in
CH2Cl2 / 0.1 M [nBu4N]+[PF6]-
+/
0
2+/+
3+/
2+
4+/3+
E1
/
E1
/
E1
/
E1
/2
2
2
2
1
2
+0.08(1)
+0.22(1)
-
-
578, 524 (w), 505 (w) cm-1
.
+0.05(2)a
+0.70(1)
+1.05(1)
[2]2+([SbF6]-)2. To a solution of compound 2 (84 mg, 0.095
mmol) in dichloromethane (5 mL) was added AgSbF6 (65 mg,
0.19 mmol) at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere.
The resulting solution was stirred for 5 min, then filtered into
a vial and layered with pentane under nitrogen atmosphere. After
a Two overlapping one-electron processes.
di-p-anisylamine;46,47 full details are provided in the Supporting
Information of ref 26. Compound 2 was synthesized using the
Horner reaction48,49 of a diformylthiophene36 with the p-
(diarylamino)benzyl phosphonate, which was itself prepared
using a general method we have recently described; 37 full details
are provided in the Supporting Information. Electrochemical data
(see Supporting Information for details) for 1 and 2 are
summarized in Table 1; both compounds may be oxidized
readily and reversibly to the corresponding dications; the
potentials are close to those for other bis(di-p-anisylamino)
systems suggesting these oxidations are principally triarylamine-
centered,18,50-52 consistent with calculations of charge distribu-
tion (Vide infra) and with the ESR spectrum of [1]+.26 In the
case of 2, oxidations to tri- and tetracationic species are also
observed and are presumably associated with the bridging
1
2 days, filtration gave dark brown crystals (100 mg, 78%). H
NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz, -85 °C, with Fe(C5H4Ac)2‚AgBF4
added to remove traces of the monocation) δ 7.95 (d, J ) 8.8
Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J ) 13.5 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (m, 4H), 7.18 (bs,
8H), 7.11 (d, J ) 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.98
(m, 8H), 4.21 (bs, 4H), 3.82 (s, 12H), 1.72 (bs, 4H), 1.41 (bs,
4H), 0.77 (bt, J ) 7.6 Hz, 6H). HRMS (FAB+) calcd for
C56H58N2O6S (M+-2SbF6): 886.4005; Found: 866.3992. Anal.
Calcd for C56H58F12N2O6SSb2: C, 49.51; H, 4.30; N, 2.06.
Found: C, 49.66, H, 4.33, N, 1.97. UV-vis-NIR (CH2Cl2,
generated in situ) λmax (ꢀmax) 1072 (85 900) nm (M-1cm-1).
X-ray Crystal Structures. All data were acquired at 120(2)
K using Mo-KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å). Structures were
refined using full-matrix least squares against F2. Parameters
relating to the crystal structure data collection and refinements
are tabulated in the Supporting Information; CIF files are also
included in the Supporting Information. The experimental data
indicated positional static disorder in some of the terminal
groups of [1]2+([SbCl6]-)2 and [2]2+([SbF6]-)2. To model the
disorder in cation [1]2+, two possible sets of atomic positions
were included in the refinement for one of the anisyl fragments
(C16-C21, O2); populations of the two positions were obtained
in ratio 0.7:0.3. In cation [2]2+ two possible positions were
considered for carbon atoms in two of the methoxy groups (C26
and C49) and for one of the n-butyl groups (C27-C30). The
ratios of occupancies after refinement were 0.55:0.45 (atoms
C34/C34′), 0.65:0.53 (atoms C48/C48′) and 0.50:0.50 (atoms
C53-C56/C53′-C56′, isotropic refinement only). In the figures
the positions of less populated sites in the disordered fragments
are omitted for clarity.
Computational Details. Geometries for the neutral, radical-
cation, and dication states of 1 and 2, and for the neutral
Chichibabin hydrocarbon were obtained using Density Func-
tional Theory (DFT). In the cases of [1]2+, [2]2+, and Chi-
chibabin’s hydrocarbon, closed-shell singlet, biradical (broken
symmetry), and triplet configurations were taken into consid-
eration. The DFT calculations were carried-out using the B3LYP
functional, where Becke’s three-parameter hybrid exchange
functional is combined with the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation
functional,39-41 with a 6-31G* split valence plus polarization
basis set. All DFT calculations were performed with Gaussian98
(Rev. A.11).42
dialkoxythiophene unit. Analytically pure crystalline [1]2+
-
([SbCl6]-)2 was isolated after oxidation of neutral 1 with ca.
three equivalents of SbCl5 in dichloromethane, followed by
precipitation with diethyl ether and by recrystallization by
layering a dichloromethane solution with diethyl ether. Analyti-
cally pure [2]2+([SbF6]-)2 was isolated after oxidation of neutral
2 with two equivalents of AgSbF6 in dichloromethane, followed
by filtration and layering with pentane.
NMR. Both dications were found to have diamagnetic ground
states. We found a solid sample of [2]2+([SbF6]-)2 to be weakly
paramagnetic; SQUID magnetometry shows Curie behavior
corresponding to µeff ≈ 0.02 µB, indicating this paramagnetism
is likely to be due to an impurity, presumably the corresponding
monocation. NMR studies of the dication are, therefore,
potentially complicated by electron exchange with traces of the
monocation; moreover, we also encountered complications due
to restricted rotation. However, we were able to obtain reason-
ably well-resolved 1H NMR spectra of [2]2+ at -85 °C (where
the restricted rotation is in the slow re´gime) in the presence of
35
a small amount of Fe(C5H4Ac)2‚AgBF4 (we found this
oxidizing agent removed monocation impurities while not over-
1
oxidizing to create [2]3+) and to assign it using H-1H COSY
and NOESY experiments: the COSY spectrum is shown in
Figure 2; additional NMR spectra of [2]2+ are given in the
Supporting Information. In the case of [1]2+ we were unable to
acquire useful NMR spectra due to paramagnetism. However,
Evans’ method NMR53 (room temperature, CD2Cl2, 400 MHz;
(44) Wolfe, J. P.; Wagaw, S.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
7215.
(45) Baumgarten, M.; Yuksel, T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 1699.
(46) Zhao, H.; Tanjutco, C.; Thayumanavan, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4421.
(47) Kauffman, J. M.; Moyna, G. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 839.
(48) Horner, L. Chem. Ber. 1958, 83, 733.
(49) Wadsworth, W. S.; Emmons, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 1733.
(50) Seo, E. T.; Nelson, R. F.; Fritsch, J. M.; Marcoux, L. S.; Leedy, D. W.;
Adams, R. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3498.
(51) Jones, S. C.; Coropceanu, V.; Barlow, S.; Kinnibrugh, T.; Timofeeva, T.;
Bre´das, J.-L.; Marder, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11782.
(52) Lambert, C.; Risko, C.; Coropceanu, V.; Schelter, J.; Amthor, S.; Gruhn,
N. E.; Durivage, J. C.; Bre´das, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8508.
(53) Grant, D. H. J. Chem. Ed. 1995, 72, 39.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis. Compound 1 was synthesized using the palladium-
catalyzed CsN coupling43,44 of E-4,4′-dibromostilbene45 with
(39) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. 1988, A38, 3098.
(40) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
(41) Lee, C. T.; Yang, W. T.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. 1988, B37, 785.
(42) Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian98, ReV. A.11, 1998.
(43) Driver, M. S.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7217.
9
1814 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 6, 2006