Spin Alignment Mediated by Delocalized Spin
A R T I C L E S
2-(di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl (150 mg, 0.50 mmol) in toluene was
refluxed for 1 day. The resulting mixture was concentrated by
evaporation under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with Et2O
and water, and the resulting organic layer was separated and dried over
MgSO4. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude product was
chromatographed on silica gel (CH2Cl2/n-hexane ) 1:4 as eluent) to
afford 7 (4.80 g, 54%) as a white solid: 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6) δ
6.96-6.99 (m, 8H), 6.91 (br-s, 2H), 3.07 (s, 6H), 1.30 (s, 18H), 1.21
(s, 18H), 1.03 (s, 18H), 0.93 (br-s, 12H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6)
δ 151.9, 151.0, 148.8, 144.3, 122.7, 115.6, 114.5, 113.6, 61.0, 40.6,
35.0, 31.6, 26.6, 26.5, 18.4, -4.2. Anal. Calcd for C48H82N4O2Si2: C,
71.76; H, 10.29; N, 6.97. Found: C, 71.58; H, 10.44; N, 6.81.
N,N′-Bis[3-tert-butyl-5-(N-tert-butyl-N-hydroxyamino)phenyl]-
N,N′-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine (8). To an ice-cooled solution of
7 (564 mg, 0.70 mmol) in 5 mL of THF were added slowly 7 mL (7
mmol) of a 1.0 M solution of tetrabutylammonium fluoride in THF.
Stirring was continued for 45 min at 0 °C and for 2 h at room
temperature. After addition of water and Et2O, the organic layer was
separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The organic
layers were combined and dried over MgSO4. By evaporation under
reduced pressure, a slightly reddish brown solid was obtained and
washed with n-hexane containing a small amount of Et2O to give 8
(355.4 mg, 88%) as a white solid: 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ
7.36 (br-s, 2H), 6.96 (s, 4H), 6.84 (t, J ) 1.9 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (t, J ) 1.9
Hz, 2H), 6.73 (t, J ) 1.9 Hz, 2H), 3.27 (s, 6H), 1.26 (s, 18H), 1.11 (s,
18H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 151.8, 151.0, 149.2, 144.4,
122.6, 115.4, 114.0, 113.3, 60.3, 40.8, 35.2, 31.6, 26.6.
N,N′-Bis[3-tert-butyl-5-(N-tert-butyl-N-oxylamino)phenyl]-N,N′-
dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine (1). To a solution of 8 (76 mg, 0.13
mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added an excess of Ag2O (308 mg, 1.3
mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. After filtration through
Celite, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue
was chromatographed on silica gel (Et2O/CH2Cl2/n-hexane ) 1:4:5 as
eluent) to afford 1 (63 mg, 83%) as a red solid: ESR (toluene at room
temperature) g ) 2.006, |aN| ) 6.3 G; FAB HRMS (m-nitrobenzyl
alcohol) m/z (relative intensity %) calcd for C36H52N4O2 [M]+ 572.4090,
found 572.4085 (7.4); C36H53N4O2 [M + H]+ 573.4169, found 573.4162
(6.2); C36H54N4O2 [M + 2H]+ 574.4247, found 574.4208 (7.4). Anal.
Calcd for C36H52N4O2: C, 75.48; H, 9.15; N, 9.78; O, 5.59. Found: C,
75.36; H, 9.10; N, 9.60; O, 5.58.
Figure 1. Spin alignment mediated by intervalence state in 1+.
the intervalence compound, N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-diphenyl-p-
phenylenediamine (3) radical cation.
Experimental Section
1H and 13C spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-AL400 or a JNM-
EX400 spectrometer, and chemical shifts are given in parts per million
(ppm) relative to internal tetramethylsilane (δ 0.00 ppm). Elemental
analyses were performed by the Center for Organic Elemental Mi-
croanalysis, Kyoto University.
Toluene and n-butyronitrile were distilled from CaH2 under an argon
atmosphere, tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled from sodium ben-
zophenone or potassium benzophenone under an argon atmosphere,
N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was dried over molecular sieves 4A,
and benzonitrile was purified through an alumina (ICN, Alumina N,
Akt. I) column with bubbling of argon, just before use. All the other
purchased reagents and solvents were used without further purification.
Column chromatography was performed using silica gel (Kanto
Chemical Co., Inc., Silica gel 60N, spherical neutral) or alumina (Kanto
Chemical Co., Inc., Aluminum Oxide, Activated for column chroma-
tography).
N,N′-Bis[3-tert-butyl-5-(N-(tert-butyldimethylsiloxy)-N-tert-bu-
tylamino)phenyl]-N,N′-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine (7). A mixture
of 5 (1.50 g, 11.0 mmol), N-(3-bromo-5-tert-butylphenyl)-N-(tert-
butyldimethylsiloxy)-N-tert-butylamine (6)9 (10.0 g, 24.1 mmol),
NaOtBu (2.50 g, 25.5 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (150 mg, 0.65 mmol), and
Electrochemical Measurements. The cyclic voltammetry (CV)
measurements were carried out in benzonitrile solution containing
0.1 M n-tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (n-Bu4NBF4) as a
supporting electrolyte (25 °C, scan rate 100 mV/s) using an ALS/chi
Electrochemical Analyzer model 612A. A three-electrode assembly was
used, which was equipped with a platinum disk (2 mm2), a platinum
wire, and Ag/0.01 M AgNO3 (acetonitrile) as the working electrode,
the counter electrode, and the reference electrode, respectively. The
redox potentials were referenced against a ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/
Fc+) couple.
UV/vis/NIR Spectrum Measurements. UV/vis/NIR spectra were
obtained with a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 19 spectrometer. Spectroelec-
trochemical measurements were carried out with a custom-made
optically transparent thin-layer electrochemical (OTTLE) cell (light pass
length ) 1 mm) equipped with a platinum mesh, a platinum coil, and
a silver wire as the working electrode, the counter electrode, and the
pseudo-reference electrode, respectively. The potential was applied with
an ALS/chi Electrochemical Analyzer model 612A.
ESR Measurements. ESR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JES-
SRE2X or a JEOL JES-TE200 X-band spectrometer, in which the
temperature was controlled by a JEOL DVT2 variable-temperature unit
or an Oxford ITC503 temperature controller combined with an ESR
910 continuous flow cryostat, respectively. A Mn2+/MnO solid solution
was used as a reference for the determination of g-values and hyperfine
coupling constants. Pulsed ESR measurements were carried out on a
Bruker ELEXES E580 X-band FT ESR spectrometer.
(7) (a) Mazur, S.; Schroeder, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7339. (b)
Nelsen, S. F.; Thomson-Colon, J. A.; Katfory, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 2809. (c) Almlo¨f, J. E.; Feyereisen, M. W.; Josefiak, T. H.; Miller, L.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1206. (d) Maslak, P.; Augustine, M. P.;
Burkey, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5359. (e) Utamapanya, S.;
Rajca, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9242. (f) Telo, J. P.; Shohoji, M.
C. B. L.; Herold, B. J.; Grampp, G. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1992,
88, 47. (g) Bonvoisin, J.; Launay, J.-P.; Van der Auweraer, M.; De Schryver,
F. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 5052. (h) Lahil, K.; Moradpour, A.; Bowlas,
C.; Menou, F.; Cassoux, P.; Bonvoisin, J.; Launay, J.-P.; Dive, G.;
Dehareng, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9995. (i) Bonboisin, J.; Launay,
J.-P.; Verbouwe, W.; Van der Auweraer, M.; De Schryver, F. C. J. Phys.
Chem. 1996, 100, 17079. (j) Nelsen, S. F.; Tran, H. Q.; Nagy, M. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 298. (k) Lambert, C.; Gaschler, W.; Schma¨lzlin,
E.; Meerholz, K.; Bra¨uchle, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2 1999, 577.
(l) Rovira, C.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Elsner, O.; Vidal-Gancedo, J.; Bonvoisin,
J.; Launay, J.-P.; Veciana, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2001, 7, 240. (m) Mayor, M.;
Bu¨schel, M.; Fromm, K. M.; Lehn, J.-M.; Daub, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2001,
7, 1266. (n) Lambert, C.; No¨ll, G.; Hampel, F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001,
105, 7751. (o) Lindeman, S. V.; Rosokha, S. V.; Sun, D.; Kochi, J. K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 842. (p) Lambert, C.; No¨ll, G. Chem.sEur. J.
2002, 8, 3467. (q) Dumur, F.; Gautier, N.; Gallego-Planas, N.; Sahin, Y.;
Levillain, E.; Masino, M.; Girlando, A.; Lloveras, V.; Vidal-Gancedo, J.;
Veciana, J.; Rovira, C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2164.
(8) (a) Lambert, C.; No¨ll, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8434. (b) Lambert,
C.; No¨ll, G.; Schelter, J. Nat. Mater. 2002, 1, 69. (c) Lambert, C.; No¨ll, G.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 2039.
(9) Ishida, T.; Iwamura, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4238.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 9, 2006 2949