ORGANIC
LETTERS
2006
Vol. 8, No. 4
797-799
Design and Synthesis of a Potent
Phorboxazole C(11−15) Acetal Analogue
Amos B. Smith, III,*,† Thomas M. Razler,† Regina M. Meis,† and George R. Pettit‡
Department of Chemistry, Monell Chemical Senses Center, and Laboratory for
Research on the Structure of Matter, UniVersity of PennsylVania,
Philadelphia, PennsylVania 19104, and Cancer Research Institute,
Arizona State UniVersity, Tempe, Arizona 85287
Received January 3, 2006
ABSTRACT
We disclose here the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of simplified Z- and E-C(2
and ( )-7E, wherein the Z-isomer proved to be a potent nanomolar cytotoxic agent. Reevaluation of (
A (6) confirms subnanomolar activity across a broad panel of human cancer cell lines.
−
3) alkynyl phorboxazole C(11
−15) acetals (+)-7Z
+
+
)-C(45 46) E-chloroalkenyl phorboxazole
−
(+)-Phorboxazole A and B (1 and 2), two architecturally
complex cytotoxic macrolides, isolated by Searle and
Molinski in 1995, have attracted considerable attention from
the synthetic community.1,2 However, because of their low
natural as well as synthetic availability, biological studies
aimed at defining their mechanism of action and/or cellular
targets remain seriously impaired. In conjunction with our
second generation total synthesis of (+)-phorboxazole A
(1),2f we recently disclosed SAR studies which identified the
C(45-46) alkynyl (3),3 alkenyl (4), alkyl (5), and E-
chloroalkenyl (6) analogues as highly potent congeners, with
activity greater than (+)-phorboxazole A (1) in several
human cancer cell lines (Figure 1).4 Consequently, our goal
became the design and synthesis of congeners also possessing
a simplified, more readily constructed macrocyclic domain,
wherein the C(11-15) tetrahydropyran is replaced with a
conformationally similar acetal, a tactic exploited to great
advantage by the Wender bryostatin program.5 This goal has
now been achieved (vide infra). Moreover, reevaluation of
the C(45-46) E-chloroalkenyl congener (6) reveals subna-
nomolar activity in several human cancer cell lines, rendering
6 to be one of the most potent cytotoxic agents known to
date.6
† University of Pennsylvania.
‡ Arizona State University.
(1) (a) Searle, P. A.; Molinski, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8126.
(b) Searle, P. A.; Molinski, T. F.; Brzezinski, L.; Leahy, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 9422.
(2) (a) Forsyth, C. J.; Ahmed, F.; Cink, R. D.; Lee, C. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 5597. (b) Evans, D. A.; Fitch, D. M.; Smith, T. E.; Cee, V.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10033. (c) Smith, A. B., III; Minbiole, K.
P.; Verhoest, P. R.; Schelhaas, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10942.
(d) Gonza´lez, M. A.; Pattenden, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1255.
(e) Williams, D. R.; Kiryanov, A. A.; Emde, U.; Clark, M. P.; Berliner, M.
A.; Reeves, J. T. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1258. (f) Smith, A. B.,
III; Razler, T. M.; Ciavarri, J. P.; Hirose, T.; Ishikawa, T. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 4399.
(3) The C(45-46) alkynyl congener (3), first reported by the Forsyth
laboratory, was shown to have potent cytotoxicity. Uckun, F. M.; Forsyth,
C. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1181.
(4) Smith, A. B., III; Razler, T. M.; Pettit, G. R.; Chapuis, J.-C. Org.
Lett, 2005, 7, 4403.
(5) Wender, P. A.; DeBrabander, J.; Haran, P. G.; Jimenez, J. M.;
Koehler, M. F. T.; Lippa, B.; Park, C. M.; Shiozaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 4534.
10.1021/ol060014v CCC: $33.50
© 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/24/2006