ketones of type 5 in good yields (Scheme 1 and Table 1).
Thus, the silylated cyanohydrins were readily prepared by
using TMSCN (1.2 equiv) and CsF (20 mol %) in CH3CN
(room temperature, 2 h), starting from the corresponding
ketones.4
Table 1. Polyfunctional Ketones Obtained by the Reaction of
the Silylated Cyanohydrins 2 with i-PrMgCl‚LiCl, Leading to
Functionalized Gignard Reagents 3, Followed by
Transmetalation with CuCN‚2LiCl and Reaction with an
Electrophile and Deprotection
The reaction of the silylated cyanohydrins 2a with
i-PrMgCl‚LiCl (4; -20 °C, 1 h) provides the intermediate
arylmagnesium reagent 3a, which is stable at low temper-
ature.6 Its transmetalation with CuCN‚2LiCl allows a smooth
cross-coupling with 3-iodocyclohexenone, leading to the
diketone 5a in 83% yield (entry 1). The removal of the
transient silylated cyanohydrin is carried out by adding TBAF
(1.5 equiv, 1 M solution in THF). After 0.5 h, a 2 M HCl
solution is added, and the reaction mixture is stirred for 2 h.
Alternatively, the Grignard reagent 3a reacts after trans-
metalation with CuCN‚2LiCl with furoyl chloride, furnishing
the diketone 3b in 85% yield (entry 2). The same behavior
is observed with the silylated cyanohydrin 2b derived from
3-iodoacetophenone. After a copper-mediated acylation with
1-naphthoyl chloride, the expected diketone 5c is isolated
after deprotection in 72% yield (entry 3). Heterocyclic
ketones can be used as well. Thus, the resulting silylated
cyanohydrin 2c is converted at -40 °C to the corresponding
heteroarylmagnesium derivative 3c. Acylation with various
acid chlorides furnishes the diketones 5e,f in 71-72% yield
(entries 4 and 5). Unsaturated 3-iodocyclohexenones can be
readily converted to the expected silylated cyanohydrins 2d,e
in almost quantitative yield. Their reactions with i-PrMgCl‚
LiCl (4) in THF at -40 °C for 1 h produce the Grignard
reagents 3d,e in high yields. Copper(Ι)-catalyzed acylation
with furoyl chloride affords after standard deprotection
(TBAF, 2 M HCl) the unsaturated diketones 5g and 5h in
81-87% yield (entries 6 and 7). A similar reactivity pattern
is observed with the silylated cyanohydrin 2f that reacts with
3-iodocyclohexenone or PhCOCl, leading to diketones 5i,j
in 71-76% yield (entries 8 and 9).
Interestingly, the silylated cyanohydrin 2e reacts after
magnesiation with PhCOCl, leading to the ketone 6, which
after Wittig olefination and deprotection furnishes dienic
ketone 7 in 83% yield. The treatment of the functionalized
diene 7 with BF3‚OEt2 (5 equiv; 0 to 40 °C, 7 h) triggers an
intramolecular Michael addition, providing the annelated
spiroketone 8 in 83% yield (Scheme 2).7
Starting from the silylated cyanohydrin 2d, we performed
after magnesiation a Negishi cross-coupling with methyl
2-iodoacrylate. The usual deprotection led to the dienic
ketone 9 in 81% yield. A solution of 9 in mesitylene was
heated (220 °C, 72 h) and underwent an electrocyclic ring
closing followed by a double bond isomerization, affording
the tricyclic ketone 10 in 85% yield (Scheme 3).
a Reaction conditions for performing the I/Mg exchange. b Overall yield
(being from the cyanohydrin) after reaction with an electrophile and
deprotection.
A direct reaction of 3 with various electrophiles (E+) or
in the presence of CuCN‚2LiCl5 provides a range of silylated
cyanohydrins that are readily converted to the polyfunctional
The use of silylated cyanohydrins as protecting group can
be also successfully applied to aldehydes. Thus, the mag-
nesiation of the silylated cyanohydrins 11a,b occurs rapidly
with i-PrMgCl‚LiCl (4) at -78 °C (0.5 h). In the presence
(4) (a) Kim, S. S.; Rajagopal, G.; Song, D. H. J. Organomet. Chem.
2004, 689, 1734. (b) North, M. Synlett 1993, 807. (c) Deng, H.; Ister, M.
P.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3333.
(d) Tanaka, K.; Mori, A.; Inoue, S. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 181. (e) Hayashi,
M.; Miyamoto, Y.; Inoue, S.; Oguni, N. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1515. (f)
Kobayashi, S.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1991, 537. (g)
Hanashima, Y.; Sawada, D.; Nogami, H.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 805. (h) Tian, S. K.; Hong, R.; Deng, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9900.
(6) (a) Fleming, F. F.; Gudipati, V.; Steward, O. W. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
659. (b) Fleming, F. F.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Steward, O. W. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 2493.
(5) Knochel, P.; Yeh, M. C. P.; Berk, S. C.; Talbert, J. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 2390.
(7) Lomberget, T.; Bentz, E.; Bouyssi, D.; Balme, G. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 2055.
618
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 4, 2006