C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Thermal, UV-Visible Absorption, and Second-Order NLO Properties of DBAB-X Compounds
λ
max (nm)
λ
max (nm)
λ
max (nm)
µâ1907
(10-48 esu)b,c
µâ0
(10-48 esu)c
a
compound
in toluene
in DMSO
in film
T (°C)
g
Tm (°C)
d
33 (pm/V)d
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
435, 335
475, 328
475, 329
493, 331
524, 341
438, 330
481, 326
482, 329
501, 329
544, 345
335, 435
483, 328
485, 330
509, 333
541, 345
74
85
91
76
96
225
239
197
227
216
170
484
430
828
1073
126
337
302
555
667
<0.1
1.3
2.1
3
17
a Absorbance of 500 nm-thick evaporated films. b CHCl3 solution. c Accuracy (10%. d 1.5 µm-thick evaporated films.
electron-attracting group for the LUMO. Consequently, the resulting
charge-transfer transition presents a bathochromic shift compared
to that of the phenyl-substituted analogues. Finally, some occupied
and vacant MOs close in energy to the HOMO and LUMO are
located on biphenyl groups, and should be responsible for the UV
transition.
The second-order NLO properties of DBAB-X compounds were
investigated in CHCl3 solutions and in solid state (powder and
evaporated thin films) by second harmonic generation (SHG) at
1907 nm where resonance and second-harmonic reabsorption effects
are ruled out. From electric field-induced second harmonic (EFISH)
measurements and using the two-level model12 for extrapolated first-
order hyperpolarizability to zero-frequency â0, the product µâ0 (µ
describing the dipole moment) was obtained. This value increases
with the electron-accepting strength of X, being the highest one
for the strongest electron-withdrawing dicyanovinylene moiety
(Table 1).13 Contrarily to previous studies on polymers, introduction
of the dicyanovinylene group substantially raises the NLO activity
and the glass transition temperature without generating lower
thermal stability.11
withdrawing groups has been developed which allows an easy
tuning of their thermal (Tg above 80 °C) and NLO properties. Upon
vacuum deposition, they form auto-organized amorphous glasses
with high optical quality and spontaneous second-order NLO
activity stable over one year. This unexpected result offers new
developments for orientationaly stable noncentrosymmetric organic
materials based on the clean and reproducible vacuum deposition
process.
Acknowledgment. P. Yu, A. Le´austic, and R. Cle´ment from
LCI (Orsay) and Veeco expertise laboratory (Dourdan-France) are
deeply acknowledged for powder X-ray diffraction (Siemens
diffractometer) and AFM measurements (model Microscope Ex-
plorer), respectively. We also thank J. Chauvin and J. Poly for their
help in running synthesis and optical experiments.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
4b-e, characterizations, and SHG equipment (PDF). This material is
References
Whereas the crystallized powder exhibited no spontaneous SHG
activity when probing at 1907 nm, vacuum-deposited films formed
from polar compounds 4b-e unexpectedly gave a significant
spontaneous signal whose intensity remains stable up to one year.
The NLO coefficient d33 ranged from 1.3 to 17 pm/V, scaling with
the strength of the electron-withdrawing group (Table 1). Formation
of acentric crystallites has been ruled out as no X-ray diffraction
peak was detected and no roughness feature was evidenced by
surface AFM imaging. Bulk homogeneity was checked through the
linear dependence found between absorbance and film thickness.
As the SHG intensity I2ω showed remarkable quadratic variation
with the film thickness, we can reasonably discard any nonlinear
contribution from the asymmetric organic layer-glass substrate
interface and put forward a molecular auto-organization. Indeed,
the SHG intensity at normal incidence has been measured to be
zero so that molecules seem to orient around a symmetry axis
normal to the film surface. Heating films above Tg led to an abrupt
and irreversible disappearance of the SHG activity. These last results
confirm the glassy character of the evaporated films where con-
structive dipole-dipole interactions due to strongly dipolar mol-
ecules might induce local ordering stable up to the glass transition
temperature.14,15
(1) (a) Shirota, Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 1-25. (b) Forrest, S. Chem.
ReV. 1997, 97, 1793-1896.
(2) (a) Tang, C. W.; VanSlyke, S. A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 11, 913-915.
(b) Doi, H.; Kinoshita, M.; Okumoto, K.; Shirota, Y. Chem. Mater. 2003,
15, 1080-1089. (c) Thomas, K. R. J.; Lin, J. T.; Tao, Y.-T.; Ko, C.-W.
Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 1354-1361. (d) Hohle, C.; Hofmann, U.; Schloter,
S.; Thelakkat, M.; Strohriegl, P.; Haarer, D.; Zilker, S. J. J. Mater. Chem.
1999, 9, 2205-2210.
(3) (a) Lundquist, P. M.; Wortmann, R.; Geletneky, C.; Twieg, R. J.; Jurich,
M.; Lee, V. Y.; Moylan, C. R.; Burland, D. M. Science 1996, 274, 1182-
1185. (b) Zilker, S. J. ChemPhysChem 2000, 1, 72-87. (c) Wu¨rthner, F.;
Wortmann, R.; Meerholz, K. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 17-31. (d) He,
M.; Twieg, R. J.; Gubler, U.; Wright, D.; Moerner, W. E. Chem. Mater.
2003, 15, 1156-1164.
(4) (a) Nakano, H.; Takahashi, T.; Kadota, T.; Shirota, Y. AdV. Mater. 2002,
14, 1157-1160. (b) Shirota, Y.; Moriwaki, K.; Yoshikawa, S.; Ujike, T.;
Nakano, H. J. Mater. Chem. 1998, 8, 2579-2581. (c) Uchida, K.; Takata,
A.; Nakamura, S.; Irie, M. Chem. Lett. 2002, 31, 476-477.
(5) (a) Eich, M.; Looser, H.; Yoon, D. Y.; Twieg, R. J.; Bjorklund, G.;
Baumert, J. C. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1989, 6, 1590-1597. (b) Van der Boom,
M. E.; Zhu, P.; Evmenenko, G.; Malinsky, J. E.; Lin, W.; Dutta, P.; Marks,
T. J. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3704-3707.
(6) Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2046-2067.
(7) Gautier, S.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Synthesis 1987, 383-385.
(8) Doyle, M. P.; Bryker, W. J. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 1572-1574.
(9) Iftime, G.; Lagugne´ Labarthet, F.; Natansohn, A.; Rochon, P.; Murti, K.
Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 168-174.
(10) Mu¨ller, C. D.; Falcou, A.; Reckefuss, N.; Rojahn, M.; Wiederhin, V.;
Rudati, P.; Frohne, H.; Nuyken, O.; Becker, H.; Meerholz, K. Nature 2003,
421, 829-833.
(11) Davey, M. H.; Lee, V. Y.; Wu, L.-M.; Moylan, C. R.; Volksen, W.;
Knoesen, A.; Miller, R. D.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 1679-
1693.
Such an assumption agrees with the large solvatochromic shift
of the charge-transfer transition observed in the amorphous films.
Molecules tend then to align following the direction of their main
charge-transfer axis. To gain insight into the molecular assemblies,
evaporated films are currently subjected to polarized UV-visible
and IR absorption spectroscopic studies.
(12) Oudar, J. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 6, 446-456.
(13) Moylan, C. R.; Miller, R. D.; Twieg R. J.; Lee, V. Y. In Polymers for
Second-Order Nonlinear Optics; Lindsay, G. A., Singer, K. D., Eds.;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995; pp 66-81.
(14) Baldo, M. A.; Soos, Z. G.; Forrest, S. R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 347,
297-303.
(15) Kim, O.-K.; Choi, L.-S.; Zhang, H.-Y.; He, X.-H.; Shih, Y.-H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12220-12221.
In summary, a novel mild and modular synthetic approach to
bulky triarylamine compounds substituted by strong electron-
JA038207Q
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 51, 2003 15745