Chemistry Letters Vol.35, No.2 (2006)
169
Table 1. Theoretical and experimental 1H NMR chemical shifts of
1, 3, and 4a
due to extension of conjugated ꢀ-electron system by linking
with a C–C triple bond between the benzene rings.
In conclusion, we synthesized cyclopentadienone-annelated
[12]DBA 1 by efficient cross-coupling reactions. Compound 1
showed weak diatropicity owing to the contribution of the
[15]annulenone resonance structure.
Ha
Hb
Hc
Hd
He
1
3
4
7.53
(7.35)
7.44
7.71
(7.73)
7.54
8.17
(8.38)
8.06
7.54
(7.34)
7.48
7.86
(7.66)
(7.28)
7.48
(7.08)
(7.40)
7.67
(7.27)
(8.16)
8.48
(7.85)
(7.24)
7.51
(7.32)
7.75
(7.37)
References and Notes
1
For selected reviews: a) Carbon Rich Compounds I, in Top. Curr.
Chem., ed. by A. de Meijere, Springer, Berlin, 1998. b) Carbon
Rich Compounds II, in Top. Curr. Chem., ed. by A. de Meijere,
Springer, Berlin, 1999. c) Acetylene Chemistry: Chemistry, Biology
and Material Science, ed. by F. Diederich, P. J. Stang, R. R.
Tykwinski, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.
aTheoretical values are shown in parentheses.
dienone acetal 9. The diiodotolan 7, a coupling partner of 9, was
prepared as follows. (2-Iodophenyl)triazene (5) and (2-ethynyl-
phenyl)triazene (6), which were prepared by the method of
Haley,12 were coupled in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 in Et3N at
55 ꢂC to give 2,20-bis(triazenyl)tolan in 75% yield, and then it
was converted by iodination with MeI to 7.7b
2
3
4
a) U. H. F. Bunz, V. Enkelmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1993, 32, 1653. b) U. H. F. Bunz, V. Enkelmann, Organometallics
1994, 13, 3823.
a) U. H. F. Bunz, V. Enkelmann, J. Rader, Organometallics 1993,
¨
One-pot operation of deprotection of two acetone-protected
termini in 9 under the basic conditions and the succeeding dou-
ble Sonogashira coupling13 with 7 afforded 10 in 52% yield.
Since the 2,5-dihalo-3,4-disubstituted cyclopentadienone from
deprotection of 10 is highly unstable and unisolable, the aryl
groups were introduced to the 2- and 5-positions by Suzuki–
Miyaura coupling with tert-butylphenylboronic acid, leading
to 4. Finally, deprotection of 4 with aqueous trifluoroacetic acid
afforded the desired cyclopentadienone-annelated [12]DBA 1 in
92% yield.14
12, 4745. b) N. Jux, K. Holczer, Y. Rubin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 1986.
a) R. Diercks. J. C. Armstrong, R. Boese, K. P. C. Vollhardt,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 268. b) J. E. Anthony,
S. I. Khan, Y. Rubin, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3499. c) Y. Tobe,
K. Kubota, K. Naemura, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3430.
For representative reviews: a) F. Diederich, Y. Rubin, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 1101. b) U. H. F. Bunz, Y. Rubin,
Y. Tobe, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 107.
a) M. Laskoski, W. Steffen, J. G. M. Morton, M. D. Smith, U. H. F.
Bunz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2378. b) J. A. Marsden,
M. J. O’Connor, M. M. Haley, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2385.
a) W. B. Wan, S. C. Brand, J. J. Pak, M. M. Haley, Chem.—Eur. J.
2000, 6, 2044. b) W. B. Wan, M. M. Haley, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
3893.
5
6
7
8
Theoretical10 and experimental H NMR data of 1 and the
1
reference compounds 315 and 4 are shown in Table 1. The theo-
retical chemical shifts are qualitatively in agreement with the ob-
served data except for Hc of 4.16 The resonances of Ha, Hb, and
He of 1 locate at the downfield compared with the corresponding
protons of 3 and 4, even though the observed chemical shift
difference is less pronounced than the calculated one. These
downfield shifts may be caused by deshielding effect of the dia-
magnetic ring current of the [15]annulenone circuit. Further-
more, in the FT-IR spectra, the C–O stretching vibration of the
carbonyl group in 1 (1697 cmꢁ1) appeared at the lower frequen-
cy region than that of 3 (1703 cmꢁ1), as expected from the the-
oretical study. These observations coupled with the theoretical
calculations strongly suggest that cyclopentadienone-annelated
[12]DBA 1 is diatropic owing to the contribution of the 14ꢀ
[15]annulenone resonance structure. However, attempts to pro-
tonate 1 with trifluoroacetic acid to form the corresponding hy-
droxy[15]annulenium ion17 failed because of its decomposition
under strongly acidic conditions.
a) J. M. Kehoe, J. H. Kiley, J. J. English, C. A. Johnson, R. C.
ˇ
´
Petersen, M. M. Haley, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 969. b) O. S. Miljanic,
K. P. C. Vollhardt, G. D. Whitener, Synlett 2003, 29. c) M. Sonoda,
Y. Sakai, T. Yoshimura, Y. Tobe, K. Kamada, Chem. Lett. 2004,
33, 972. d) M. Iyoda, S. Sirinintasak, Y. Nishiyama, A. Vorasingha,
F. Sultana, K. Nakao, Y. Kuwatani, H. Matsuyama, M. Yoshida,
Y. Miyake, Synthesis 2004, 1527.
9
a) P. v. R. Schleyer, C. Maerker, A. Dransfeld, H. Jiao, N. J. R. v. E.
´
Hommes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6317. b) L. Nyulaszi,
P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6872. Although
Matzger and Vollhardt reported the usual NICS values of several
dehydrobenzoannulenes and those which eliminated local anisotro-
py of triple bonds,11 the NICS values reported in the present paper
do not take the latter into account.
10 For theoretical study, tert-butyl groups of 1, 3, and 4 were omitted
for clarify.
11 A. J. Matzger, K. P. C. Vollhardt, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6791.
12 D. B. Kimball, T. J. R. Weakley, M. M. Haley, J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 6395.
As shown in Figure 2, the UV–vis absorption bands of 1
shift considerably to the longer wavelength than those of 3,
13 C. Huynh, G. Linstrumelle, Tetrahedron 1998, 44, 6337.
14 Spectroscopic data are listed in Supporting Information.
15 3 was prepared in 61% overall yield by Sonogashira coupling of 8
with 4-tert-butylphenylacetylene,4c followed by Suzuki–Miyaura
coupling with 4-tert-butylphenylboronic acid and deprotection of
its acetal moiety with aqueous TFA.14
6
1
16 While the theoretical chemical shift of Hc of 1 locates at downfield
relative to that of 4, experimentally the former appears at higher
field than the latter. The dihedral angles of the phenyl group relative
to the five-membered ring are 27.8 and 43.2ꢂ, respectively, indicat-
ing that Hc of 1 should be more susceptible to the anisotropic
deshielding effect in contrast to the observed chemical shifts. The
reason for this discrepancy is not understood.
17 a) R. T. Weavers, R. R. Jones, F. Sondheimer, Tetrahedron Lett.
1975, 16, 1043. b) H. Higuchi, N. Hiraiwa, T. Daimon, S. Kondo,
J. Ojima, M. Iyoda, G. Yamamoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71,
221.
3
4
2
ε
0
250
350
450
550
wavelength / nm
Figure 2. UV–vis spectra of 1 (bold) and 3 (plain) in THF at rt.