M. L. Sanders, I. O. Donkor / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 1965–1968
1967
inhibition. Increasing the alkyl chain to four methylene
Acknowledgments
groups (as in 5) further increased l-calpain inhibition.
We attribute the increase in potency with increased
chain length to favorable interaction with the S3 subsite
of l-calpain. Introduction of a heteroatom into the alkyl
chain appeared to enhance potency (5 vs. 6) presumably
due to hydrogen bonding in the S3 pocket of the enzyme
and/or a change in the conformation of the molecule. A
benzyl group was preferred as the R1 substituent (e.g.,
9 > 12 > 11), while the iso-butyl group was the preferred
R2 substituent (e.g., 9 > 6 > 8 > 7). Thus, the SAR of the
urea-based calpain inhibitors mirrored that of peptidyl
aldehyde calpain inhibitors.7,8,16 However, the urea-
based inhibitors were generally less potent than the cor-
responding peptide-based analogues. For example, 9
was 10-fold less potent than the closely related peptidyl
aldehyde inhibitor 13. The decrease in potency is consis-
tent with the observation that peptide substrates of cal-
pain that bind to the enzyme with L-Leu residue
occupying the S2 subsite are efficiently cleaved by the en-
zyme24–26 and that peptide aldehydes with P2 L-Leu
residues are potent inhibitors of calpain.25–28
The study was supported in part by NIH Grant
R21CA104982 and American Heart Association (South-
east Affiliate) Grant 0255066B.
References and notes
1. Saido, T. C.; Sorimachi, H.; Suzuki, K. FASEB J. 1994, 8,
814.
2. Santella, L.; Kyozuka, K.; Deiso, L.; Carafoli, E. Cell
Calcium 1998, 2–3, 123.
3. Zatz, M.; Starling, A. N. Eng. J. Med. 2005, 352, 2413.
4. Mehendale, H. M.; Limaye, P. B. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
2005, 26, 232.
5. Branca, D. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 322,
1098.
6. Liu, X.; Van Vleet, T.; Schnellmann, R. G. Ann. Rev.
Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 44, 349.
7. Donkor, I. O. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 12, 1171.
8. Wells, G. J.; Bihovsky, R. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 1998, 8,
1707.
9. Wang, K. K. W.; Yuen, P.-W. Adv. Pharm. 1997, 37, 117.
10. Iwamoto, H.; Miura, T.; Okamura, T.; Shirakawa, K.;
Iwatate, M.; Kawamura, S.; Tatsuno, H.; Ikeda, Y.;
Matsuzaki, M. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1999, 33, 580.
11. Bartus, R. T.; Chen, E. Y.; Lynch, G.; Kordower, J. H.
Exp. Neurol. 1999, 155, 315.
12. Atencio, I. A.; Ramachandra, M.; Shabram, P.; Demers,
G. W. Cell Growth Differ. 2000, 11, 247.
13. Zhu, D.-M.; Uckun, F. M. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6,
2456.
14. Inoue, J.; Nakamura, M.; Cui, Y. S.; Sakai, Y.; Sakai, O.;
Hill, J. R.; Wang, K. K.; Yuen, P. W. J. Med. Chem. 2003,
46, 868.
15. Biswas, S.; Harris, F.; Phoenix, D. A. Biologist 2001, 48,
273.
16. Iqbal, M.; Messina, P. A.; Freed, B.; Das, M.; Chatterjee,
S.; Tripathy, R.; Tao, M.; Jose, K. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1997, 7, 539.
17. DeWitt, S.; Kiely, J.; Stankovic, C.; Schroeder, M.; Cody,
D.; Pavia, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 6909.
18. Lin, C.; Liou, S.; Lai, S.; Lin, H.; Ko, F.; Liu, H.; Teng, C.
J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1995, 47, 588.
Most peptide calpain inhibitors lack selectivity for the
enzyme because they equally inhibit other cysteine pro-
teases such as the cathepsins. Only a few active site-di-
rected calpain inhibitors with good selectivity for the
enzyme compared to the closely related cathepsins are
known.7 We therefore tested compounds 6 and 9,
which were the most potent members of the series
against human liver cathepsin B to determine if chang-
ing the geometry at the P2-position from chiral/tetrahe-
dral to achiral/trigonal planar will favor binding to l-
calpain over cathepsin B. As shown in Table 1, com-
pounds 6 and 9 were markedly selective for l-calpain
over cathepsin B. Compound 9, which was the most
potent member of the series, was also the most selective
inhibitor. It was over 220-fold selective for l-calpain
compared to cathepsin B, while the equivalent peptidyl
aldehyde inhibitor 13 was only 8-fold selective for l-
calpain over cathepsin B. Thus, despite the apparent
10-fold decrease in l-calpain inhibitory potency of
the urea-based compounds compared to their peptide-
based analogues, the urea backbone appears to be a
good scaffold for the discovery of active site-directed
l-calpain inhibitors with enhanced selectivity for the
enzyme.
19. Donkor, I. O.; Korukonda, R.; Huang, T. L.; LeCour, L.,
Jr. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 783.
20. Chatterjee, S.; Gu, Z.-Q.; Dunn, D.; Tao, M.; Josef, K.;
Tripathy, R.; Bihovsky, R.; Senadhi, S. E.; O’Kane, T. M.;
Mckenna, B. A.; Mallaya, S.; Ator, M. A.; Bozyczko-
Coyne, D.; Siman, R.; Mallamo, J. P. J. Med. Chem. 1998,
41, 2663.
In summary, our results suggest that transformation of
the geometry of the a-carbon of the P2 amino acid res-
idue of peptide aldehyde calpain inhibitors from chiral/
tetrahedral to achiral/trigonal planar by replacement of
the P2 chiral carbon with nitrogen maintains the gener-
al SAR of peptide aldehyde calpain inhibitors. The
change in geometry at the P2-position also improves
the selectivity of the inhibitors for l-calpain over
cathepsin B albeit a 10-fold decrease in l-calpain
inhibitory potency. We are currently in the process
of synthesizing active site-directed l-calpain inhibitors
that incorporate the urea scaffold with the objective
of improving l-calpain inhibitory potency, while
retaining the high selectivity of the inhibitors for the
enzyme.
21. Tripathy, R.; Gu, Z.-Q.; Dunn, D.; Senadhi, S. E.; Ator,
M. A.; Chatterjee, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 19,
2647.
22. Calpain assay: l-Calpain activity was monitored in a
reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4),
50 mM NaCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
EGTA, 0.2 mM or 1.0 mM Suc-Leu-Tyr-AMC (Calbio-
chem), 2 lg porcine erythrocyte l-calpain (Calbiochem),
varying concentrations of inhibitor dissolved in DMSO
(2% total concentration), and 5 mM CaCl2 in a final
volume of 250 lL in a polystyrene microtiter plate. Assays
were initiated by addition of CaCl2 and the increase in
fluorescence (kex = 370 nm, kem = 440 nm) was moni-
tored at ambient temperature using a SPECTRAmax
Gemini fluorescence plate reader (Molecular Devices).
The Ki values were estimated from the semi-reciprocal