condensation reagent to give the compound 5 in 66% yield.
The iodine oxidative sulfenylation6 of the sodium methane-
sulfinate with disulfide 5a afforded the protected thiosul-
fonate, which was deprotected without purification with
formic acid followed by HPLC purification to give the target
tag 6. In a similar manner, the enantiomeric acid ent-4 gave
the thiosulfonate ent-6.
The new tags were attached to the proteins apo-calmodulin
(apo-CaM)7 and trigger factor.8 An 15N,1H HSQC spectrum
of trigger factor is shown in Figure 2 for tag 6 loaded with
Figure 1. EDTA-based metal chelates.
can be implemented for the protein under investigation. In
addition, for the study of domain motions, it is essential to
align one domain by the paramagnetic tag and to study the
induced alignment on the others.3
The enantioselective synthesis of two novel tags is
described in Scheme 1. The optically active (R)-2,3-bis[di-
Scheme 1. Preparation of Tags 6
Figure 2. 15N,1H HSQC of the 15N-labeled S100C mutant of trigger
factor tagged with 6. The full loading of the tag with Dy3+ is
obvious from the absence of any peaks from the isotropic spectrum
of trigger factor. The inset shows the isotropic (red) and anisotropic
(blue) ω1-coupled resonances of A52.
Dy3+. The overview spectrum indicates the high quality of
the sample. No isotropic peaks were detected. NH resonances
even in close proximity to the tag site (C100) can be
observed, as for example Q99. This is because the metal is
farther away from the protein backbone for 6 and ent-6 (16
Å) than for the tags 3a and 3b (13 Å). Inlays show
expansions of the isotropic (red) and anisotropic (blue) ω1-
(3) (a) Tu¨chelmann, A.; Schwalbe, H.; Griesinger, C. Poster at the
Meeting on Stable Isotope Aided NMR of Biomolecules, Third European
Conference, Oxford 1998. (b) Bertini, I.; Del Bianco, C.; Gelis, I.; Katsaros,
N.; Luchinat, C.; Parigi, G.; Peana, M.; Provenzani, A.; Zoroddu, M. A.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 6841.
(4) (a) Feeney, J.; Birdsall, B.; Bradbury, A. F.; Biekofsky, R. R.; Bayley,
P. M. J. Biomol. NMR 2001, 21, 41. (b) Ma, C.; Opella, S. J. J. Magn.
Reson. 2000, 146, 381. (c) Wo¨hnert, J.; Franz, K. J.; Nitz, M.; Imperiali,
B.; Schwalbe, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13338.
(5) (a) Gaponenko, V.; Sarma, S. P.; Altieri, A. S.; Horita, D. A.; Li, J.;
Byrd, R. A. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 28, 205. (b) Gaponenko, V.; Altieri, A.
S.; Li, J.; Byrd, R. A. J. Biomol. NMR 2002, 24, 143. (c) Ikegami, T.;
Verdier, L.; Sakhaii, P.; Grimme, S.; Pescatore, B.; Saxena, K.; Fiebig, K.
M.; Griesinger, C. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 29, 339. (d) Leonov, A.; Voigt,
B.; Rodriguez-Castan˜eda, F.; Sakhaii, P.; Verdier, L.; Griesinger, C. Chem.-
Eur. J. 2005, 11, 3342.
(6) Fujiki, K.; Tanifuji, N.; Sasaki, Y.; Yokoyama, T. Synthesis 2002,
343.
(7) Watterson, D. M.; Sharief, F.; Vanaman, T. F. J. Biol. Chem. 1980,
255, 962.
(8) Crooke, E.; Wickner, W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987, 84,
5216.
(tert-butyloxycarbonylmethyl)amino]propionic acid 45d was
coupled to 4-aminophenyl disulfide, using HATU as the
1276
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 7, 2006