3680 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 11, 2002
Mac´ıas-Ruvalcaba et al.
260 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3400, 3232, 3070, 2934, 1666, 1592,
1531, 1483, 1433; UV-vis (EtOH; λmax, nm (ꢀ)) 211 (35889),
271 (44790), 401.5 (8556); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 12.74 (s, 1H,
NH), 8.13 (dd, 1H, J ) 7.2, 1.7 Hz, H8), 8.016 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.5,
0.6 Hz, H5′), 8.09 (dd, 1H, J ) 7.2, 1.7 Hz, H5), 7.76 (td, 1H, J
) 7.4, 1.8 Hz, H7), 7.71 (td, 1H, J ) 7.4, 1.8 Hz, H6), 7.46 (d,
1H, J ) 8.7 Hz, H2′), 7.20 (dd, 1H, J ) 7.0, 1.5 Hz, H3′), 2.47
(s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 180.13 (C1), 177.28 (C4),
134.11 (C1′), 133.34 (C7), 132.91 (C8a), 132.91 (C4a), 132.52 (C4′),
132.24 (C6), 128.31 (C3′), 125.75 (C8), 125.53 (C5), 124.16 (C2),
121.57 (C6′), 121.56 (C5′), 116.98 (C3), 113.06 (C2′), 21.11 (CH3);
MS m/z 261, 260, 232, 204. Anal. Calcd for C17H11NO2: C,
78.15; H, 4.24; N, 5.36. Found: C, 77.88; H, 4.17; N, 5.08.
2-Aceth yl-5H-ben zo[b]ca r ba zole-6,11-d ion e (COMeB-
CD). Recrystallization from glacial acetic acid gave a 12%
yield: mp 265-266 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3430, 3173, 3136, 2926,
2858, 1667, 1639, 1588, 1385; UV-vis (EtOH; λmax, nm (ꢀ)) 205
(11332), 232 (14479), 266 (31135), 368 (4897); 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 13.16 (s, 1H, NH), 8.81 (d, 1H, J ) 0.9 Hz, H5′), 8.14 (dd,
1H, J ) 7.0, 1.5 Hz, H8), 8.10 (dd, 1H, J ) 7.5, 1.5 Hz, H5),
7.95 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.7, 1.8 Hz, H3′), 7.81 (td, 1H, J ) 7.5, 1.5
Hz, H6), 7.76 (td, 1H, J ) 7.5, 1.5 Hz, H7), 7.60 (d, 1H, J ) 8.7
Hz, H2′), 2.67 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 179.94 (C1),
171.15 (C4), 140.28 (C1′), 138.30 (C4′), 133.74 (C6), 132.72 (C7),
132.45 (C4a), 132.35 (C8a), 125.87 (C8), 125.74 (C5), 125.74 (C3′),
124.82 (C6′), 123.97 (C5′), 123.25 (C2), 118.27 (C3), 113.47 (C2′),
26.289 (CH3), 196.47(CdO); MS m/z 289, 274, 264, 190. Anal.
Calcd for C18H11NO3: C, 74.73; H, 3.83; N, 4.84. Found: C,
74.45; H, 4.18; N, 4.53.
2-(Tr iflu or om e t h yl)-5H -b e n zo[b]ca r b a zole -6,11-d i-
on e (CF 3BCD). Recrystallization from nitrobenzene gave a
16% yield: mp 250-252 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3400, 3244, 2920,
1658, 1593, 1475, 1402; UV-vis (EtOH; λmax, nm (ꢀ)) 206
(24943), 226 (18334), 280 (40512), 348 (6360); MS m/z 315, 287,
279, 166, 149. Anal. Calcd for C17H8F3NO2: C, 64.77; H, 2.56;
F, 18.08; N, 4.44. Found: C, 64.52; H, 2.48; F, 17.48; N, 4.16.
Electr och em ica l P r oced u r e. Solven t a n d Su p p or tin g
Electr olyte. Acetonitrile (AN) was dried overnight with CaCl2
and purified by distillation on P2O5 under vacuum.40 Traces
of water in the solvent were eliminated by contact with 3 Å
molecular sieves in the dark. The absence of the characteristic
-OH bands in the IR spectrum confirmed complete elimination
of water traces. Tetraethylammonium tetrafluroborate (Et4-
NBF4) was dried under vacuum at 60 °C.
Electr od es, Ap p a r a tu s, a n d In str u m en ta tion . Cyclic
voltammograms were performed at 25 °C. A solution of 0.1 M
tetraethylammonium tetrafluroborate in acetonitrile was used
as the electrolytic medium. Since the solubility of the amino-
quinones in this medium varied, it was not possible to use all
the compounds at the same concentrations. Depending on their
solubility, the quinone concentrations varied from 0.34 to 0.64
mM. Prior to electrochemical determinations, N2 was bubbled
through all solutions for 60 min. The inert atmosphere was
especially critical in this study since dissolved oxygen in
solution not only can be reduced at potentials close to the
quinone reduction potentials, but also is capable of oxidizing
the radical anion generated in the first stage of reduction, as
occurs with other quinones.41
Voltammetric curves were recorded using an electrochemical
analyzer interfaced with a personal computer. Measurements
were made over a potential range between +433 and -2233
mV with a scan rate of 10-8000 mV/s. Cyclic voltammetry
for all the experiments used a three-electrode cell equipped
with a 7 mm2 glassy carbon working electrode. Prior to
measurements, this electrode was cleaned and polished with
0.05 µm alumina, wiped with a tissue, and sonicated in
distilled water for 2-4 min. The counter electrode consisted
of a platinum wire with a greater area than the working
electrode. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) served as the
reference electrode.
between the oxygen of the C1-O1 carbonyl and the
nitrogen atom (O1‚‚‚H-N). The decrease in electron
density on the naphthoquinone system explains the
slightly less negative reduction potentials measured for
the first one-electron transfer in the BCDs compared with
PANs.
On the other hand, the absence of the interaction
O1‚‚‚H-N and the delocalization of the electronic density
on the carbonyl C1-O1 are factors that contributed to
diminishing the polarization of the C1-O1 carbonyl,
indicating that the C4-O2 carbonyl must be more elec-
trophilic than the C1-O1 carbonyl. Thus, in the BCDs,
the first wave corresponds to reduction of the C4-O2
carbonyl, as supported by the fact that, in all the BCDs,
the LUMO is at C4, and not at C1, as observed for the
PAN derivatives.19 From the obtained results, it was
possible to establish that the reactivity of the quinones
to accept the first electron depends on both the LUMO
energy of the quinone and the stability of the radical
anion toward the comproportionation reaction.
Greater susceptibility to the effect of the substituents
of the E1/2 potentials of wave I with respect to wave II in
the BCDs is due to the fact that the displacement of the
unshared electrons of the nitrogen, which depends on the
substituent R, mainly modifies the electron density of the
C4-O2 bond, with less effect on the electron density of
the C1-O1 bond.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Syn th esis. 1H and 13C NMR spectra (500 and 75 MHz,
respectively) were recorded in CDCl3 using TMS as a reference.
Signals of multiplicity are described as follows: s, singlet; d,
doublet; t, triplet; dd, doublet of doublets; td, triplet of doublets.
Molecular numbering is given in Table 1. Mass spectra (MS)
were performed by electron impact with a beam energy of 70
eV. IR spectra were recorded in KBr pellets. Elemental
analyses were performed by Galbraith Laboratories, Inc.
Melting points are not corrected.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e P r ep a r a tion of 2-R-5H-
ben zo[b]ca r ba zole-6,11-d ion es (BCDs). The synthesis and
characterization of PAN and its derivatives are described
elswhere.19 The preparation of BCDs (Table 1) was performed
according to Bittner,38 whose method involves oxidative cou-
pling of the corresponding PANs19 in the presence of palla-
dium(II) acetate. Equal amounts of the corresponding PAN,
benzoquinone, and Pd(OAc)2 in glacial acetic acid were placed
in a three-neck, round-bottom flask (equipped with a ther-
mometer and a reflux condenser with a humidity-absorbing
trap). The reaction mixture was stirred at reflux temperature
o
(110 C) under nitrogen for the required reaction time, which
varied for the PAN used. The disappearance of the starting
material and appearance of the product were monitored by
thin-layer chromatography using mixtures of CH2Cl2/EtOH.
Once the reaction time was completed, the mixture was
allowed to cool to room temperature and filtered to eliminate
the Pd(0) formed during the reaction. To ensure elimination
of all the AcOH, the reaction mixture was evaporated to
dryness at reduced pressure. The residual solid was purified
by column chromatography using the mixture of solvents
mentioned above to give the corresponding benzocarbazoledi-
ones. All the compounds obtained by column chromatography
were later recrystallized from the appropriate solvent. The
preparation of BCD and MeOBCD was performed as de-
scribed.38,39
2-Meth yl-5H-ben zo[b]ca r ba zole-6,11-d ion e (MeBCD).
Recrystallization from acetone gave a 35.5% yield: mp 257-
(40) Coetzee, J . F.; Cunningham, D. K.; Mc. Guire, D. K.; Pad-
manabban, A. Anal. Chem. 1962, 34, 1139-1143.
(41) Wardman, P.; Tai-Shun L.; Sartorelli, A. C. J . Med. Chem. 1986,
29, 1381-1384.
(38) Bittner, S.; Krief, P.; Massil, T. Synthesis 1991, 215-216.
(39) Luo, Y.-L.; Chou, T.-C.; Cheng, C. C. J . Heterocycl. Chem. 1996,
33, 113.