Scheme 4. Elaboration of Butenolide 15 to an Advanced Lituarine B,C Intermediate
presence of SnBr4 resulted in the formation of a single
butenolide 1515 (Scheme 4) proved to be reliable and the
sequence was followed without incident to give intermediate
17 with a fully functionalized tetrahydrofuran ring. Both of
the key C-C bond-forming steps proceeded with high
stereocontrol. The C(16) stereochemistry, arising from the
conjugate addition, was established after complete assign-
compound, which we were delighted to find was the desired
ketone 14 obtained as an approximately 1:1 mixture of
diastereomers. Although we had not expected significant
diastereocontrol in this reaction, we were not able to rule
out the possibility that the addition had taken place to give
predominantly one stereoisomer and that loss of stereochem-
ical information had occurred subsequently by epimerisation
at the acetal center, e.g., by protic acid catalysis as illustrated
in Scheme 3. Since this mode of equilibration would be
accompanied by loss of anomeric stabilization in the (rigid)
lituarine system, we were confident that the results of high
stereocontrol in the analogous reaction in that system would
be retained during workup and purification.
1
ment of the H and 13C NMR spectra; from this, NOESY
correlations were established between the C(16) methyl and
both C(14) protons, and between H(16) and the C(12) methyl,
as illustrated in Figure 2. Second, in the reaction to form
The results of these model studies were then brought to
bear on the total synthesis. The chemistry from tricyclic
(5) Our working hypothesis is that a stabilizing interaction of the
incoming nucleophile, and then the forming C-C bond, with the tetra-
hydropyran [C(15)-O]σ* acts cooperatively with electrostatic and solvation
effects to favor attack anti to the six-membered ring oxygen. Cf. Corey, E.
J.; Boaz, N. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 3063.
(6) Ogawa, T.; Pernet, A. G.; Hanessian, S. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973,
3543.
Figure 2. Diagnostic NOESY correlations.
(7) (a) Mead, K. T.; Zemribo, R. Synlett 1996, 1063. (b) Zemribo, R.;
Mead, K. T. Synlett 2000, 1569.
(8) Brimble, M. A.; Fares, F. A.; Turner, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1998, 677.
(9) Umbricht, G.; Hellman, M. D.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 3, 5173.
(10) Lewis, A.; Stefanuti, I.; Swain, S. A.; Smith, S. A.; Taylor, R. J. K.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 104.
1
adduct 17, the H NMR spectrum of the crude product
indicated the presence of a single diastereomer only. As-
signment of the newly formed stereogenic center at C(18)
followed from a NOESY correlation between the C(16)
methyl and H(18), and the absence of a correlation between
H(16) and H(18).
(11) Fukuda, H.; Takeda, M.; Sato, Y.; Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1979,
368.
The sense of stereoselectivity in the formation of adduct
17 is accommodated by Woerpel’s “inside attack” model16
(12) Brewster, K.; Harrison, J. M.; Inch, T. D.; Williams, N. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 21.
(13) Cf. (a) Ballini, R.; Barboni, L.; Bosica, G.; Fiorini, D. Synthesis
2002, 2725. (b) Ballini, R.; Barboni, L.; Bosica, G.; Fiorini, D. Synthesis
2003, 316 (correction).
(14) Prepared in a standard procedure from methyl isopropyl ketone,
LDA, and TMSCl. Cf. Beutelman, H. P.; Xie, L.; Saunders, W. H., Jr. J.
Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 1703.
(15) Prepared on a multigram scale in a variant of the synthesis reported
in ref 1b; in particular, the absolute stereochemistry was established by
kinetic resolution through Sharpless epoxidation of (()-2-methylhepta-1,6-
dien-3-ol.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 22, 2005
5009