A R T I C L E S
Grotenbreg et al.
positions, respectively.4 The observation that GS acts against
the lipid bilayer itself and not against a specific cell membrane
associated biomolecule is underscored by the finding that
enantiomeric GS is equally active.5 GS targets a broad range
of bacteria depending on the type of bioassay, with solution-
based microbiological screening assays showing greater activity
against Gram-negative bacteria than gel-based assays.2c GS
appears rather indiscriminate toward the nature of the lipid
bilayer and kills mammalian cells with equal efficiency. For
instance, GS displays potent hemolytic activity, and it is for
this reason that the use of GS in human medicine is restricted
to topical applications.2,6
those of amino acids.11 SAAs can be readily obtained and
incorporated into oligopeptides as dipeptide isosteres. Our
strategy is to analyze the conformational behavior of SAA
modified GS analogues using both NMR and X-ray analysis
and to correlate the results with toxicity studies toward both
bacterial strains and red blood cells. In the course of these studies
we observed an intriguing conformation in GS analogue 1,
containing a furanoid SAA at one of the turn regions.10b One
of the two hydroxyl functionalities of the SAA moiety in 1 (C3-
OH) is involved in an intraresidue hydrogen bond leading to a
distortion of the â-hairpin structure (Figure 1B), as compared
to GS. Inspection of the molecular packing of 1 in its X-ray
structure revealed a hexameric â-barrel-like structure composed
of six crystallographically equivalent units of 1, with the
positively charged Orn side chains extending into the core and
the Val, Leu, and DPhe residues forming a hydrophobic
periphery (see Figure 1C). This hexameric â-barrel-like pore
structure, the first of its kind, agrees with a molecular arrange-
ment as suggested in a barrel stave type mechanism of
membrane disrupting cationic antibiotic peptides.12
At first, our interest in this X-ray structure was dampened
by the strongly reduced antibacterial activity displayed by 1.10a
We reasoned that the diminished biological activity of 1
compared to GS could be caused by either the altered â-hairpin
structure or by the hydrophilic character of the SAA moiety as
compared to the hydrophobic DPhe-Pro sequence in GS. As one
of the hydroxyl groups of the SAA moiety of 1 is not involved
in hydrogen bonding (C4-OH), it can be modified to introduce
an aromatic functionality, thus more closely resembling the
hydrophobic nature of the original turn sequence. We here
present a synthetic strategy that allows the facile introduction
of aromatic functionality in the SAA turn region of 1 (GS
analogues 10a-c) and provide an in-depth structural analysis,
as well as a biological evaluation. We show that analogues
10a-c adopt the same distorted cyclic â-hairpin secondary
structure as compound 1 but that the biological activity is
comparable to that of the natural product, gramicidin S.
Peptide antibiotics such as GS that target the lipid bilayer as
a whole, and not a specific subcellular target, are of great interest
in the search for new antibiotics.7 In general, bacterial strains
can readily become resistant against compounds that interfere
with a specific metabolic process, or block a specific enzyme
or receptor, by genetically altering the target such that it defies
recognition.8 Gaining resistance against GS would require a
strategy that, for instance, specifically destroys it or blocks its
accumulation in the lipid bilayer. Arguably, such alterations are
less easily attained through genetic mutations, and it is for this
reason that the search for nontoxic GS analogues and related
cationic antimicrobial peptides has found wide attraction.9
Obviously, this search can only be concluded successfully when
compounds are identified that do act upon bacterial lipid bilayers
but leave their mammalian counterparts untouched. For this to
be possible it is of profound importance to understand the exact
mode of action with which GS disrupts lipid bilayers. At present
such detailed information is not available.
We have contributed to the field of GS-based antibiotics by
the synthesis of analogues in which one of the two type II′
â-turns is replaced with selected sugar amino acids (SAA).10
SAAs are sugar peptide hybrids that combine monosaccharide
properties (conformational rigidity, added functionalities) with
(4) Hull, S. E.; Karlsson, R.; Main, P.; Woolfson, M. M.; Dodson, E. J. Nature
1978, 275, 206-207.
(5) Shemyakin, M. M.; Ovchinnikov, Y. A.; Ivanov, V. T.; Ryabova, I. D.
Experientia 1967, 23, 326. (b) Goodman, M.; Chorev, M. Acc. Chem. Res.
1979, 12, 1-7.
Materials and Methods
Abbreviations. GS ) gramicidin S, SAA ) sugar amino acid.
Synthesis. Except when indicated otherwise, all reactions were
performed under an inert atmosphere and at ambient temperature. All
reagents were purchased from Aldrich, Acros, or Novabiochem and
were used as supplied. CAUTION: Sodium azide is toxic and can
explode when exposed to heat, pressure, or shock, particularly in
combination with heavy metals or their salts. Organic azides, such as
derivatives 3-6a-c, can in principle also decompose explosively, and
appropriate safety measures must therefore be taken at all times. Full
details, including the characterization of the intermediates, are provided
in the Supporting Information.
(6) Kondejewski, L. H.; Farmer, S. W.; Wishart, D. S.; Hancock, R. E. W.;
Hodges, R. S. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 1996, 47, 460-466.
(7) (a) Matsuzaki, K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 1-10. (b) Epand,
R. M.; Vogel, H. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 11-28. (c) Sitaram,
N.; Nagaraj, R. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 29-54. (d) Shai, Y.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 55-70. (d) Dathe M.; Wieprecht, T.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 71-87. (e) Blondelle, S. E.; Lohner,
K.; Aguilar, M.-I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 89-108. (f) Maget-
Dana, R. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 109-140. (g) Lohner, K.;
Prenner, E. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 141-156. (h) Bechinger,
B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 157-183. (i) La Rocca, P.; Biggin,
P. C.; Tieleman D. P.; Sansom, M. S. P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999,
1462, 185-200. (j) Prenner, E. J.; Lewis, R. N. A. H.; McElhaney, R. N.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 201-221. (k) Breukink, E. J.; de
Kruijff, B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1462, 223-234.
(8) Walsh, C. T. Antibiotics: Actions, Origins, Resistance; ASM: Washington,
DC, 2003.
(9) (a) Zasloff, M. Nature 2002, 415, 389-395. (b) Lee, D. L.; Hodges, R. S.
Biopolymers 2003, 71, 28-48. (c) Bulet, P.; Sto¨cklin, R.; Menin, L.
Immunol. ReV. 2004, 198, 169-184. (d) Finlay, B. B.; Hancock, R. E. W.
Nat. ReV. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 497-504. (e) Lehrer, R. I. Nat. ReV.
Microbiol. 2004, 2, 727-738.
Representative Alkylation Procedure. Alcohol 3 (1.96 g, 8.55
mmol) was dissolved in DMF (40 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. To the
solution were added benzyl bromide (1.124 mL, 9.4 mmol, 1.1 equiv)
and sodium hydride (376 mg, 9.4 mmol, 1.1 equiv), and the mixture
(10) (a) Grotenbreg, G. M.; Kronemeijer, M.; Timmer, M. S. M.; El Oualid, F.;
van Well, R. M.; Verdoes, M.; Spalburg, E.; van Hooft, P. A. V.; de
Neeling, A. J.; Noort, D.; van Boom, J. H.; van der Marel, G. A.; Overkleeft,
H. S.; Overhand, M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7851-7859. (b) Grotenbreg,
G. M.; Timmer, M. S. M.; Llamas-Saiz, A. L.; Verdoes, M.; van der Marel,
G. A.; van Raaij, M. J.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Overhand, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 3444-3446. (c) Grotenbreg, G. M.; Christina, A. E.;
Buizert, A. E. M.; van der Marel, G. A.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Overhand, M.
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8331-8339.
(11) (a) Gervay-Hague, J.; Weathers, T. M. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2002, 21, 867-
910. (b) Schweizer, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 230-253. (c)
Gruner, S. A. W.; Locardi, E.; Lohof, E.; Kessler, H. Chem. ReV. 2002,
102, 491-514. (d) Chakraborty, T. K.; Srinivasu, P.; Tapadar, S.; Mohan,
B. K. J. Chem. Sci. 2004, 116, 187-207.
(12) (a) Oren, Z.; Shai, Y. Biopolymers 1998, 47, 451-463. (b) Shai, Y.
Biopolymers 2002, 66, 236-248. (c) Yeaman, M. R.; Yount, N. Y.
Pharmacol. ReV. 2003, 55, 27-55. (d) Brogden, K. A. Nat. ReV. Microbiol.
2005, 3, 238-250.
9
7560 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 23, 2006