320
G. Reyes-Rios, J.J. García / Inorganica Chimica Acta 392 (2012) 317–321
Considering the above-discussed results made under stoichiom-
The methylated compounds were prepared in situ by reaction of
etricamountsofPdNPs, atthispointisworthytonotethatjustamin-
or amount of metallic palladium atoms would be in the surface to be
active in catalysis. Thus, catalytic amounts of PdNPs were assessed
for this process, using alkyl amines and alcohols as substrates. Ta-
ble 3 summarizestherelevant resultsfor such catalyticexperiments.
In general, the use of catalytic amounts of PdNPs results in good
to moderate yields. Particularly, the use of 2 mol% of (1) for the
alkylation of hexadecylamine by methanol and isopropanol al-
lowed the highest conversions, 70% and 60%, respectively (Table 3,
entries 1 and 2). The reaction with isopropanol is selective towards
the mono-alkylation. Meanwhile, the dialkylation of the amine
with methanol is observed. Lower yields were obtained on using
a load of 1 mol% of catalyst (Table 3, entry 4). Also, lower conver-
sions on using cyclohexylamine and isopropanol were obtained
(Table 3, entries 3 and 5), probably due to significant steric hin-
drance in both substrates. A complementary mechanistic proposal
was recently formulated by Zhang et al. for the alkylation of
amines with alcohols under catalytic conditions [22]; from these
studies, the occurrence of a hydrogen-borrowing process, started
with the oxidation of the alcohol to form the corresponding car-
bonyl compound, is postulated similarly as illustrated in Scheme 1.
chlorinated compounds with excess of MeMgBr [25].
4.2. Typical procedure for the alkylation of hexadecylamine by
methanol and related alcohols
A typical experiment is described as follows: methylated cata-
lytic precursor (1) or (2) (0.03 g, 0.08 mmol), hexadecylamine
(0.075 g, 0.313 mmol for stoichiometric ratio experiments) and
(0.483 g, 2.5 mmol for catalytic ratio experiments) were mixed
with methanol (15 mL, 368 mmol) in the reactor vessel. This was
closed, taken out from the glovebox. Then, in a well-vented
fume-hood, the autoclave was pressurized with H2 to the corre-
sponding pressure as indicated in Table 1 and heated to the desired
temperature, under constant stirring. After 72 h, heating was
stopped and the reactor was allowed to cool down to room tem-
perature, then, the remaining H2 was released to the fume hood.
The vessel was opened to air and the reaction mixture was filtered
in a Celite column, an aliquot of the mixture was immediately in-
jected into the GC–MS. A second aliquot of the same mixture was
also analyzed by 1H and 13C{1H} NMR.
Acknowledgments
3. Conclusion
We thank CONACyT and PAPIIT-DGAPA-UNAM (IN-201010) for
their financial support to this work. G.R.R. thanks CONACyT for a
Grant. Also we thank Dr. Alma Arévalo for technical support.
In conclusion, we developed a method where the use of PdNPs
afforded the N-alkylation of amines employing alcohols as alkylat-
ing agents in good yields (>80%) under neat conditions and low
hydrogen pressure. The reaction allowed the production of di-
alkylated or mono-alkylated amines, depending on the nature of
the alcohol. Such selectivity is sensitive to the size of the alcohol,
yielding mono-alkylation products when bulky alcohols are used
and dialkylation when small alcohols are used. Likewise, good
yields were obtained using catalytic amounts of PdNPs.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
4. Experimental
[1] (a) O.J. Plante, S.L. Buchwald, P.H. Seeberger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000)
7148;
(b) B. Zou, H.-F. Jiang, Z.-Y. Wang, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2007) 4600;
(c) C. Torborg, M. Beller, Adv. Synth. Catal. 351 (2009) 3027;
(d) G. Guillena, D.J. Ramón, M. Yus, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 1611;
(e) F. Alonso, P. Riente, M. Yus, Acc. Chem. Res. 44 (2011) 379;
(f) C. Fischer, B. Koenig, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 7 (2011) 59;
(g) G. Cami-Kobeci, P.A. Slatford, M.K. Whittlesey, M.J.J. Williams, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 535;
(h) D.J.C.L. Constable, P.J. Dunn, J.D. Hayler, G.R. Humphrey, J.L. Leazer Jr., R.J.
Linderman, K. Lorenz, J. Monley, B.A. Pearlman, A. Wells, A. Zaks, T. Zhang,
Green Chem. 9 (2007) 411;
All manipulations were carried out using standard Schlenk
techniques and a MBraun glovebox (H2O and O2 < 1 ppm) under
high-purity argon (Praxair 99.998%). Stainless steel Parr pressure
vessels 4750 (125 mL) were used for catalysis experiments. Meth-
anol and isopropanol (J.T. Baker) were dried and distilled from the
corresponding Grignard reagent. Tert-Butanol (>99%; Aldrich) were
distilled and degassed by the freeze–pump–thaw method prior to
use. MeMgBr (3.0 M in THF solution) was purchased from Aldrich
and was used as received. (COD)PdCl2 and hexadecylamine were
purchased from Aldrich, dried in vacuo and used without further
purification. PEt3 was purchased from Aldrich and was also used
without further purification. 1,2-Bis(diisopropylphosphino)ethane
(dippe) was prepared as reported [23].
Deuterated solvents were purchased from Cambridge Isotope
Laboratories and were stored over 3 Å molecular sieves in the
glovebox. 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra were recorded at room tem-
perature on a 300 MHz Varian Unity spectrometer in CDCl3. 1H
chemical shifts (d) are reported relative to the residual proton res-
onances in the deuterated solvent. 31P{1H} NMR spectra were re-
corded relative to external 85% H3PO4. All NMR spectra were
carried out using thin wall (0.38 cm) WILMAD NMR tubes with J.
Young valves. GC–MS determinations were performed using an
Agilent 5975C GC–MS equipped with a 30 m DB-5MS capillary
(0.32 mm ID) column, using triethylamine as internal standard.
(i) S.L. Buchwald, C. Mauger, G. Mignani, U. Scholz, Adv. Synth. Catal. 348
(2006) 23.
[2] (a) A.S. Guram, R.A. Rennels, S.L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 34 (1995)
1348;
(b) J.F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 37 (1998) 2046;
(c) B. Schlummer, U. Scholz, Adv. Synth. Catal. 346 (2004) 1599;
(d) J.F. Hartwig, Acc. Chem. Res. 41 (2008) 1534;
(e) Y. Aubin, C. Fischmeister, C.M. Thomas, J.L. Renaud, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39
(2010) 4130.
[3] (a) A. Levi, G. Modena, G. Scorrano, Chem. Commun. (1975) 6;
(b) M.J. Burk, J.E. Feaster, R.L. Harlow, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 10125;
(c) R.P. Tripathi, S.S. Verma, J. Pandey, V.K. Tiwari, Curr. Org. Chem. 12 (2008)
1093;
(d) M.E. Dominea, M.C. Hernández-Sotoa, Y. Pérez, Catal. Today 159 (2011) 2.
[4] (a) R.H. Crabtree, Organometallics 30 (2011) 17;
(b) T.D. Nixon, M.K. Whittlesey, J.M.J. Williams, Dalton Trans. (2009) 753;
(c) M.H.S.A. Hamid, C.L. Allen, G.W. Lamb, A.C. Maxwell, H.C. Maytum, A.J.A.
Watson, M.J. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 1766;
(d) M.H.S.A. Hamid, A. Slatford, M.J. Williams, Adv. Synth. Catal. 349 (2007)
1555;
(e) J. Pasek, P. Kondelik, P. Richter, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 11 (1972)
333;
(f) A.J.A. Watson, A.C. Maxwell, J.M.J. Williams, J. Org. Chem. 76 (2011) 2328.
[5] A.B. Brown, E.E. Reid, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 46 (1924) 1836.
[6] F. Valot, F. Fache, R. Jacquot, M. Spagnol, M. Lemaire, Tetrahedron Lett. 40
(1999) 3592.
[7] (a) R.G. Rice, E.J. Kohn, L.W. Daash, J. Org. Chem. 23 (1958) 1352;
(b) R.G. Rice, E.J. Kohn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 4052.
4.1. Nanoparticle precursors
Complexes [(dippe)PdCl2] (1) and [(Et3P)2PdCl2] (2) were pre-
pared following the procedures reported in the literature [24].