Acknowledgements. Program was supported through a grant
from the State of Colorado Economic Development BDEGP
Infrastructure grant (G.F.M), and a pilot grant from the
University of Colorado Cancer Center (M.E.A.C.).
overnight incubation. After overnight incubation, culture medium
in each well was replaced by 1mL of fresh drug medium
(medium without 10% FBS and drug dissolved as 24 μM). After
1 h drug treatment, 100 μL of FBS was added to each well.
Trypan blue exclusion was used to quantify cell density after
additional 24-hour treatment. Following data were reported as:
Cell viability (%) = [cell density (drug-treated sample) / cell
density (control sample – with 100%DMSO only)]*100.
ALPHA assay:The ALPHA assays with biotin-labeled H3/H4
(50 nM) and either His-tagged human Asf1a (1-155 aa) at 50 nM
or GST-tagged human Asf1a (1-155 aa) at 50 nM were
performed according to manufacturers instructions. Briefly,
H3/H4 dimer and Asf1 were incubated together for 15 min at
room temperature. The compounds (at 100 µM or lower
concentrations in 2 % DMSO) were then added and incubated for
30 min. The appropriate donor and acceptor beads were then
added, and the 96-well tray incubated at 4 °C overnight in the
dark. The fluorescence intensity of each sample was then
measured using an EnVision Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer). The
values for IC50 or % inhibition at 100 µM compound were
determined from curves fitted using Graphpad Prism software.
10 Kim, K.H.; Hansch, C.; Fukunaga, J.Y.; Edward E. Steller,
E.E. and Jow P.Y.C,; J. Med Chem, 1979, Vol. 22, No. 4. 366-
391
References and notes
1
Bao, Y.; Shen, X.; Cell, 2006, 127, 458
2 Das, C.; Tyler, J.K.; Churchill, M. E.A., Trends in Biochemical
Sciences, 2010, 35, 476
3 Donham, D.C.; Scorgie, J.K.; Churchill, M.E.A.; Nucleic Acids
Research, 2011, 39 (13), 5449.
4 Corpet, A.; De Koning, L.; Toedling, J.; Savignoni, A.;
Berger, F.; Lamaitre, C.; O’Sullivan, R.J.; Karlseder, J.;
Barillot, E.; Asselain, B.; Sastre-Garau, X.; Almouzni, G.;
EMBO J, 2011, 30 (3), 480
5 Das, C.; Lucia, M.S.; Hansen, K.C.; Tyler, J.K.; Nature, 2009,
459 (7243), 113
6 English, C.M.;Adkins, M.W; Carson, J.J;, Churchill M.E.E.A.;
Cell, 2006, 127(3), 495-508
7 Natsume, R.; Eitoku, M.;Yusuke Akai, Y.; Sano, N.; Horikoshi,
M.; Senda, T.; Nature, 2007, Vol 446, 338.
8 The atomic coordinates for H3/H4 from PDB code 2HUE were
extracted to permit small molecule docking to a structural pocket
on the surface of Asf1. The site for molecular docking was
selected using DMS (UCSF) to generate a molecular surface, and
SPHGEN_CPP to define spheres that represent sites of potential
ligand atoms. Spheres within 8 Å of Asf1 position 112 (Tyr)
were selected as the site for molecular docking. Grid-based
scoring implemented in DOCK6.5 was used. This was
accomplished using a scoring grid extending 5 Å in 3 dimensions
from the selected spheres. DOCK6.5 was used to screen drug-
like compounds (National Cancer Institute Developmental
Therapeutics Program NCI plated 2007, 139,735 compounds,
docked in 1,000 orientations and scored for hydrophobic (van der
Waals score) and electrostatic interactions (electrostatic score) at
the UF High Performance Computing Center by parallel
processing using 8 cpu. Compounds were ranked based on
overall Energy Score (van der Waals score + electrostatic score).
The top 40 scoring compounds (out of 103, 539 drug-like small
molecules screened by molecular docking) were obtained from
the NCI DTP to measure effects on Asf1 activity.
11 Duan, Z.; Xin L.; Huang, H.; Yuan, W.; Zheng, S.; Liu, X.;
Zhang, Z.; Choy, E.; Harmon, D.; Mankin, H.; and Hornicek. F.;
J. Med Chem., 2012, 55, 3113-3121
12 Brown, R.F.; Jacobs, T.L.; Winstein, S.; Kloetzel, M.C.;
Spaeth, E.C.; Florsheim, W.H.; Robson, J.H.; Levy, E.F.; Bryan,
G,M.; Magnusson, A.B.; Miller, S.J.; Ott, M.L.; Terek, J.A.; J.
Am. Chem. Soc, 1946, 2705
13 Beak, P.; Lee, W. K., J. Org. Chem 1990, 55 (9), 2578-2580.
14 Mehta, P.D.; Sengar, N.P.S.; Pathak, A.K.; Eur. J. Medchem.,
2010, 45, 5541
15 Hasan, H.; Akhter, M.; Ali, I.; Zaheen, M.; Ahsan, I.;
Mahmood, D.; Med Chem Res. 2011, 20, 1357
16 Cossio, F.P.; Arrieta, A.; Sierra, A.; Acc. Chem Res. 2008, 41,
8, 925
17 Diagnostic proton NMR signals for the acyl hydrazone was the
methylene group which appears in the NMR as a singlet. In
comparison, the beta lactam protons appear as a doublet of
doublets due to germinal coupling. See for example ref 15 or
Upadhyay, A., Srivastava, S. K.; and Srivastava, S.D.; Synthetic
Communications, 2011, 41: 2544–2556.
9 Biological evaluation of compounds was carried out using
several assays. ELISA assay:50 µL H3/H4 dimer at 1 μg/mL in
PBS-T (phosphate buffered saline and Tween 20) was used to
coat the wells of a PVC microtiter plate and left at 4°C overnight.
The wells were washed 3 times with 200 µL PBS-T. They were
then blocked by incubating with 200 μL blocking buffer (5% non
fat dry milk in PBS-T) for at least 2 h at room temperature,
followed by 3 washes with PBS-T. The globular core domain of
Asf1 at 5 µM was incubated with each compound at 100 µM (or
various concentrations) for 1 h at 4°C. After diluting samples
with buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.9, 1 mM DTT), 50 µL of each
sample was applied to the microtitre plate, and incubated for 1 h
at room temperature, prior to washing 3 times with PBS-T. The
presence of Asf1 was evaluated using the primary Asf1 antibody
(sc-166482; Santa Cruz) and HRPT-conjugated secondary
antibody following the manufactures protocol. 50 uL TMB
(3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine) was added to each well, and
incubated for 15-30 min, prior to addition of stop solution (2 M
H2SO4). The optical density was measured at 450 nm and Asf1
binding to H3/H4 was analyzed using Graphpad Prism software.
Cell viability: MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured to reach 80%
confluence. Cells were harvested, suspended in medium (1.5 x
105 cells/mL) and seeded into 12 well plates (1 ml/ well) for
18 For a review of acyl hydrazone biological activity see Padmini,
K.; Preethi, P.J.; Divya, M.; Rohini,P.; Lohita, M.; Swetha, K.;
Kaladar, P.; Int. J Pharma Res. Review, August 2013; 2(8):43-
58
19K mmerle, A.E.; Schmitt, M.; Cardozo,S.V.S; Lugnier, C.;
Villa, P.; Lopes, A.B.; Romeiro, N.C; Justiniano, H.; Martins,
M.A.; Fraga, C.A.M.; Bourguignon, J. and Barreiro, E.J.; J. Med.
Chem. 2012, 55, 7525−7545.
20Melnyk, P.; Leroux, V.; Sergheraerta, C.; Grellier,P.; Bioorg
Med. Chem. Letters, 2006, 16, 31–35 and references therein.
21 Ling, A.; Hong, Y.; Gonzalez, J.; Gregor, V.; Polinsky, A.;
Kuki, A.; Shi, S.;Teston, K.; Murphy, D.; Porter,J.; Kiel, D.;
Lakis,J.; Anderes,K.; and May, J.; J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3141-
3149
22 Beebe,X.; Darczak,D.; Davis-Taber, R.A.; Uchic,M.E.; Scott,
V.E.; Jarvis, M.F; and Stewart, A.O. Bioorg Med. Chem. Letters
2008, 18, 2162–2166